 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| shoes by NEX51855 from Shoes | Nectar, nectar everywhere. by MikeKN from Amateur Photographer - Macro Challenge | Mother and Child by Kukla from SILHOUETTES, CONTOURS | That's the last we'll see of him... by pocoloco from What passes for normal [New Shot] | Desolation by stemcell from Urban Exploration - Urban Decay | door by Vygintas from I see red. | Abandoned Bus by Papa48 from Kodak - Specific Equipment Challenge |
I don't get it.
FredW: To me, there's a bigger issue here. I'm ok with the orbing levels of my Jan 2012 x10 but I would not be ok with the x10 orbing levels I've seen in many of the online postings here and elsewhere.
It appears that there has been a significant, unpublished sensor change or sensor batch variance. I think this helps also to explain the split on the forum regarding the x10. The x10s are performing at different levels depending on when they were produced.
The fourth wave: Finally, a camera that gives me the orbs I want!
With today's technology, it's amazing to me that a problem like this even exists.
Josh152: Even if you never see an orb you have still been knowingly sold a defective camera at an obscenely high price by Fuji who wont even openly admit the problem exists and who even mocked their own customers over the issue. In the end that is all that matters. This type of behavior should not be rewarded with loyalty or your hard earned money.
Even if you love the X10 you should not be defending it or Fuji. You are just encouraging and excusing bad behavior.
We need to hold Fuji accountable for their actions regardless of what you think of the X10.
Josh, you're right. Consumers can like it, but defending Fuji's actions is ridiculous.
carsten böttcher: "reflects new production efficiencies... will result in a substantial reduction in the camera’s market price..." or better said "massive price reduction because SD1 doesn't sell as expected" means someone's woken up to get the Foveon investment back. Hope the DPs will have better IQ than the horrible SD1.
Totally agree.
Jogger: Im gonna get this for my NEX-5N.
That is hilarious.
I've seen shots from th SD and they're lousy! not worth $7000, not worth $2300! Any number of cameras, much cheaper, can do better.
4fps? 4? $3,000? Really?
Four? Four?! That should tell us something.
You get what you pay for.
A great loss. Let us send our best thoughts to his family and friends, and also to Sigma, that they may carry on and honor this gentleman's memory.