jkokich
Joined on
Jan 25, 2012
|
Comments
 |  |  |
| Montréal Dépaneur Out of Business DP by MarioSS from Your City - Out of Business | Wish You Were Here by Dutch Newchurch from Street musician playing | Flight of a Puffin by cjf2 from Flight |
Beginner's GuidesGetting Started
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
real world performanceField Test Videos
see how we seeSample Galleries
In-depth ReviewFujifilm X100F
Show CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017
Throwback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days Past
What's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise
2468FeatureWhat is equivalence?
RubberDials: It looks like we will all now be in loco parentis, burping Canon users getting over-excited about their first proper mirrorless.
Expect the 'EVF is no substitute for a good optical viewfinder' crowd to start turning up to work with their trousers on backwards and odd shoes. :)
I think he was kidding...
Suave: No 4k, no peaking, this is like a guide to self-inflicted wounds.
That made me laugh! Thank you!
As an iPhone filmmaker, I love this!
jkokich: My iPhone 6s Plus has fantastic stabilization built in. This is pretty much useless.
Impressive footage. Aside from the tracking ability, though, I'm good with my iPhone alone. The Osmo is, however, better than I thought it would be.
jkokich: My iPhone 6s Plus has fantastic stabilization built in. This is pretty much useless.
Alan, you're telling me this thing will do that? I'd love to see that footage; I'll be happy to stand corrected.
My iPhone 6s Plus has fantastic stabilization built in. This is pretty much useless.
Exit10: Interesting but does not seem to support 4K video or 1080p at 60fps which limits its attraction to me
Exit10 that was hilarious! Thank you for making me laugh! (I love my iPhone 6sPlus with all that stuff!)
jkokich: I'm comparing the IQ of the Canon with the IQ of my Sony A3000, which cost me $260. The Canon is $1200? Canon fail.
Oh, I checked the raw, as well. $1200 vs $260? The fact that Sony even comes close is a Canon fail.
I'm comparing the IQ of the Canon with the IQ of my Sony A3000, which cost me $260. The Canon is $1200? Canon fail.
Nikon: ML cameras don't have this problem. We still do, but we're working on it.
I loved my Nikons, but ML is the future, and the future is now.
Mister Joseph: Just some non-sense comparison: My 2014 sedan is $25,000 and my wife's 2015 SUV is $32,000.
Happy wife, happy life.
jkokich: The photos simply don't look good enough to warrant the price.
I'm not dismissing Leica lenses, I'm dismissing the photos provided. Those just aren't that good. If you want to talk about the quality of photos taken with other lenses, that's another story.
The photos simply don't look good enough to warrant the price.
All three, awesome!
None of these photos look impressive.
AstroStan: surprised there are no comments (yet) about the bokeh.
I find it to be ugly and distracting.
I agree with you.
I'm sure I'm not the only one is so completely over the whole GoPro thing.
Horshack: Played with the D500 at CES yesterday. I posted my findings here:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57053571
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57054590
Horshack is a very old and respected name...
Kinda cool, but simply too costly. $50 for one cartridge? No.
Much sound and fury.