Lives in Philippines Quezon City, Philippines
Joined on Sep 16, 2002
About me:

Equipment: Sony a7 iii, Sony a5100, a5100, Lumix gx7, 20D. Panasonic fz-1000
Lenses -
for Sony: Tamron 28-75 f2.8 RXD, Sony FE 28 f2.0, Sony FE 24-240.

Sony 16-50 f3.5-5.6 OSS, 55-210 f4.6.3 OSS, 18-105 f4 PZ OSS, 50 f1.8 OSS.

For Panasonic: Lumix 12-35 f2.8 I, 12-60 f3.5-60 OIS, Oly 45 f1.8, PL 15mm f1.7, PL 24 f1.4, Olympus 14-150, 45-150.

For Canon: ef 85 f1.8 usm, ef-s 10-22 f3.5-4.5, ef 70-200 f2.8L IS, efs 18-135 STM, 50mm f1.8 STM, he Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4.0 Di.
Plan to get an a6400, sony 70-350 OSS.

Love sports/action, portraits, candid, street, photography. Love doing weddings and happy events.


Total: 309, showing: 301 – 309
« First‹ Previous13141516Next ›Last »
On article Aptina signs patent cross-license agreement with Sony (30 comments in total)
In reply to:

dosdan: Aptiva + Sony = An even tougher time for Canon sensor innovation.



It does not matter how many alliances are formed. If Canon has something really groundbreaking to come out this year, they can't touch that product till they can come out with their own. But I don't think Canon has anything that Sony or Aptiva is to be worried about. If any, it is the other way around.

The fruits of this alliance takes time to bear fruit. I don't expect to see anything this year. Maybe 1.5 year from now, we'll see something come out. It takes time to digest and do R&D to integrate that into one's own product line.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2013 at 05:17 UTC
On article Just Posted: Sony Alpha SLT-A99 review (496 comments in total)
In reply to:

schufosi777: Pity I cannot buy it. I am an English speaker living in Japan and it comes with Japanese menus only and Sony will not allow it to be imported from anywhere. So its down to the other two who do have English menus.

It seems it is only a Sony thing. In our country, you can buy a gray Kiss camera (for Japan market vs the Rebel name in the USA and the xxD numbering elsewhere) and the menus are in english. It is user selectable.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 01:32 UTC
In reply to:

Absolutic: also is it still going to be that you can only edit your post only once and also only during the first 10 or 15 minutes, or you finally will let people edit their posts at any point?

I thought about that same thing in the past, however, in an argument/debate, the OP or anyone can't just back out of a position if he can't continuously change his older posts to remove/edit the offending logic error or idea. By locking the post after a time, it makes sure that you can't weasel out of what you wrote before.

I wouldn't mind the spelling errors. It's the factual reference that is frozen in time and must be preserved that is more important. We can always ask the site to put a spelling checker there (auto or on demand) if spelling is just your beef. Even that, won't be perfect though, but still not the main thing why you should not be able to re-edit your post after a certain time or no of times.

The most that can be done reasonably is give you 3 chances to re-edit say, within 10-15 min which is just reasonable I think.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2012 at 23:49 UTC

Sounds good! We'll just have to wait to see how it actually works before more comments and suggestions come in!

I have a question though, how will this revamped pages work out with android OS or tablets/smartphones accessing it? Do you have a separate/alternate template for that or it will work just the same?

On another subject, I bet those stats on complaints column is going to be a subject by itself! A positive or thumbs up column would also be helpful.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2012 at 23:39 UTC as 312th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

vladimir vanek: What the... is this?? :D I don't need any apps or whatever in a CAMERA! I only need 3 functions, M, Tv and Av... :)


You are going to regret those thing you said in a year to 2 years from now. Wifi is not a gimmick. Anybody who has tried to transfer files or tried to print and be bound by wires will tell you otherwise.

As for Android, I am not sure if that will be OS of choice. But all these hacking shows you that there is a need to have users activate or add features that were not there. If Android will be that OS to make it easier and standard well that is well and good.

Many cannot see the advantages of these 2 techs because there is no precedent. But the success of Android is partly to the ability to customize a smarphone or tablet. If you can do the same with the camera then we will enter a new phase of photo-video that is unheard of.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2012 at 00:22 UTC


But somewhere in the hoopla of the smartcamera, we lost and forgot the features of the camera! What's the sensor size? ISO range? Does it have PASM? Max-min shutter speed? Does it do burst mode? Does it have auto-ISO? Is it configuratble? It does video but what framerate? Does it have stabilzation? Etc. etc.

This may not be a good start. In any case, I'll wait for version 2. Interesting as this one may be, there will be many things forgotten and not done right in the first outing. The lack of a 2nd camera or a tilt screen alone will make skyping hard to imagine!

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 18:57 UTC as 94th comment | 2 replies
On article Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

Absolutic: I don't understand the 78 score, dpreview. I own this camera, and it is clearly, and by far, the best pocketcam on the market. You state on your site that scores are relevant only to other cameras in the same class. Since it is the best pocket digitam on a market, why is it not a above 80 GOLD Score?

Ok I guess you state in one of your comments that gold awards are subjective and for standout products. Don't agree with you guys there. I am a former owner of D800 and present owner of Canon 5D Mark III and Sony NEX-7, both gold award winners. Both 5D Mark 3 and NEX-7 are amazing cameras; but RX100 is a phenomenal and standout product, I shoot it in bright light and I shoot it in very low light at ISO3200 and get absolutely phenomenal shots that I could have never gotten with previous compacts. This camera is something special. I do agree with Richard re: 1/2000 a limiting factor. I was shooting in bright sun today and had to stay at F/2.8 because 1/2000 is too slow.

Although I agree with you, I would not lose sleep over it. I respect the DPR staff, but I couldn't care less if they give it a 10%. If you know how good something is, it does not matter if it gets a Gold, Silver, or even tin cup award.

Eventually, the market decides. And companies would rather be judged by that. Awards are just good in paper but they won't necessarily generate income.

As for the shutter speed limitations, they could still maintain that 1/2000 but maybe in the future, have a built-in NDF, that would help. That would be helpful for video too.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 01:47 UTC
On article Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: I have been in and around cameras for nigh on 30 years now. My career in film & TV has resulted directly from my interest photographic pictures and the majesty of the engineering involved in the cameras & lenses and artists that capture them. I've been lucky enough to use pretty much every sort of camera going, from point-and-shoot to full-frame models from Canon, Nikon & Leica & beyond - and for differing requirements. But when all is said and done and despite its flaws, as an all-rounder, I have to say that in terms of cost, quality, weight, size, speed and the fact that the thing is there with you in the first place to take the damn picture... and most especially and simply in the quality of the output, as in what a given picture looks like when you look it on a given screen,  after having simply pressed the shutter release in say, programme mode, then as far as I'm concerned, the Sony RX100 is the best camera currently made, bar none. Just my ha'penth worth.

I couldn't have said it better.


Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 01:41 UTC

This is good news! My question is - is this a pure EF mounting only, or does it allow me to use also ef-s lenses? It would be a great boon if it did. There are good lenses in the ef-s family like the 17-55 f2.8 and the 10-22. True native aps-c lenses. It would be a shame if we can't mount it there.

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 02:30 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies
Total: 309, showing: 301 – 309
« First‹ Previous13141516Next ›Last »