Michael Alex

Lives in United States CA, United States
Works as a Commertial printing
Joined on Oct 28, 2009


Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7

Time to look elsewhere, bye-bye Adobe...

Link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 21:37 UTC as 798th comment

Capable tool with K-5 guts with easy video and fun focus peaking. If one had a chance to handle K-01, "like a plastic toy" verdict is VERY laughable. Have it in silver, like it & will keep it.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 01:23 UTC as 99th comment
In reply to:

RStyga: Stability improvements.. bug fixes. Apparently the contrast adjustment is secondary, although some users might find it important if shooting in strong daylight.

Too bad there is no FW update for people, there are so many what could benefit...

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2013 at 03:23 UTC
On article Time magazine showcases Top 10 photos of 2012 (147 comments in total)

It's called "freedom of speech". Would you like to change that? Hope not...

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2012 at 04:09 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

neo_nights: Wow! The K5-IIs is the new High ISO king for APS-C cameras! Impressive, indeed!

Ditto for ISO 6400 RAW on Martini. (Easily removable in PP) moire by Mickey - yes. Even N D7000 has some. However, destructive NR of Fuji kills substantially detail on my LG monitor. BTW, I own K-5 IIs and "loving" (it's a tool) it...

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2012 at 03:16 UTC
In reply to:

neo_nights: Wow! The K5-IIs is the new High ISO king for APS-C cameras! Impressive, indeed!

Sorry, the K-5 IIs is well sharper with much more detail than Fuji X-Pro1. Therefore still KING. Please try RAW 200 (Fuji doesn't do ISO 100) Martini seals.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2012 at 02:12 UTC
In reply to:

Rule 34: I own a Pentax K7. Considering Pentax only makes one f2.8 SDM at this range that costs $1500 or so and has far worse distortion characteristics than the sigma which is ~$800 cheaper I can still see the benefit for that system at least. I could care less about lens based stabilization systems, half the reason for buying a Pentax was to avoid needing that in a lens. I agree that they should drop the price a bit for the non-OS version though, the hardware can't be free.

I would sell you DA*16-50 for $1,500 if you want, but the rest of us can get it new for $849.95 from Amazon or B&H.

Regretfully, Sigma remains on my "don't touch this" list for good, hence the annoying QC as Lupti points out...

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2011 at 03:00 UTC
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7