ecka84

I love 40mm :)

It's nice to see the APS-C chip where it belongs :)

Well, the sensor already exists.

It's not even about the FF. I can put my ($500) 100F2 on a GFX and get equivalent but better results than with this 50F1. Why is it $1500?! Because of the F1.0? It's just a meaningless number...

Yay! The 100mp A7RV?! :)

"I am not blowing this issue out of proportion" - You are.
Trust me, there's a million holes in each OS security. MS tried to fix a few and now you can't stop lamenting about it. Apple doesn't even...

Oh .. please, don't be so naive. You are blowing it out of proportions. There are simple workarounds for that.

For a Mac user mentality, that may seem outrageous. While normal people can just thrown the document on a flash drive and print it directly by plugging it to a printer or do it via smartphone.

There are no safe operating systems.

Well, maybe you like it weird :). It's OK.

Again ... US is not a Santa Claus.

"raw is not quite that raw" - And you'd prefer to deal with the bad pixels yourself, every time? What's the point?
My camera can map out bad pixels itself automatically. And that's a great feature.

@zakk9
See, it wasn't worth it, economically.

@Thecylon
Did you even care to investigate if that "profit" compensated for the expenses and loses? It's not that simple.

@larkhon
"Ecka will never give you a comparison of shots he made to support his points because it's so obvious" - No. Because I don't use any toy cameras to make a comparison.
The question is - why...

And you, marc petzold, are making a fool of yourself, again.

"things are not becoming better, if you just like your own comment" - Well, I don't. Do you?

"it does have very decent IQ for a 1 inch...

Maybe you should take over Windows development then :)

@marc petzold
I don't care how beautiful and fancy the plane is, if it cannot fly and we need to put it on a railroad to get anywhere. What I mean by that is if the images are not good enough, then...

The 1" bridgecam with an equivalent 70-200F2.8 lens, which is 26-73F1, would be just as big and heavy too. Just like the 1" with 24-70F2.8 equivalent lens, which is 8.8-26F1, would not be any...

@aris14
Still, I find it rather irrational (even silly) to have a special camera (system) for things of lesser importance. Isn't the phone enough already?

"... are more than enough" - Everything...