dth29

A German ambassador who has good contacts and also has the camera said that in his video. Also, mulit-shot-hi-res mide only makes sense without AA-filter.

You alreaday posted this silly statement now about four times here in this thread. Posting it several times doesn't make it more true and I just wonder what your motivation is.

It doesn't ;-)

That's then the 24-70/2.8 GM.

Actually I think this setting of 109+ depends on how the picture settings and profiles for the jpg are. If you set high contrast, the jpg would clip earlier than when setting low conntrast - ...

The clipping level reffers to the JPG-output, not to the sensor readout or raw data. So any changes on the JPG-adjustments are considered. On the other hand, the clipped areas in the JPG often ...

AsIII - It is more robust (also the mount for larger lenses), has the better EVF and good electronic shutter capabilities (both silent mode and 1st curtain - first curtain el. on A7c not ...

I too would agree that these are any atmospheric, natural effects - no issue with the camera or the lens. Layers with uneven humidity could cause this. I would not try to postprocess it - it is ...

My understanding is that only the lens-mount is licensed, not the camera-mount. That would exclude teleconverters.

Third party suppliers are only allowed to sell lenses or adapters for lenses: https://support.d-imaging.sony.co.jp/www/e_mount/en/detail.html

There is none, and I would not expect one to come. The 'open mount' only includes the lens mount, not the camera side which would be necessary for a converter. So a third party supplier could not ...

If you look at the 'Lenses for Sony A7RIV'-report from DXOmark , you will find out that the FE85/1.8 is a very good option for the A7RIV, even with higher peak sharpness ond comparable overall ...

Yes Resolution on the long side RIV vs. RIII: 9504/7952=1.195171 - ok, it is 19.5%, almost 20% - that's what you could make a print larger and that's what the lp/mm of a lens has to be higher.

The RIV has 19% more resolution in one dimension. I don't think that makes a significant difference.

No, the stress for the mount would be several times higher with the body on the tripod as the mass center is way further away. The lever and the torque are much larger. Also, with the lens on the ...

E-Mount specification license

- The contract with Sony does not allow to offer a teleconverter I think. - The Sigma does have less magnification than the GM. - It is slower. I would want to replace my 70-200/4 G. The GM could ...

Which one do you mean? The f1.8 version does not have E-Mount, the E-Mount version is f2.8.