OlHeath

I'd take a 7iii over an rii, ymmv but for me the vast improvements across the board in the third gen more than make up for the fewer pixels.

Peak Freak, you can check my posting history (always wise before calling people trolls - i've ploughed about £20k into Sony emount gear since the A7, how about you?) Or you might consider that...

Sony user, very excited about this announcement and may switch for it. Sony have treated their vid shooters like garbage the last few years. 8k seems largely pointless right now, high end PCs...

So Fuji have added low light composite mode, something Sony had on its aps, all lost when they pulled aps with the third generation and have not put back in, two generations later. Well at least...

Likewise, Sony shooter, but that is one gorgeous lens...

Another thing to watch out for is a setting about 'viewfinder brightness - auto', as i recall, which for some reason can artificially brighten what you see. Switch that setting to manual, zero.

Works for me too.

Would get the 7iii and some of the lenses mentioned above (the 7iii has lower noise, better AF than the 7r3)

Hi all, thinking of switching for video since Sony refuse to offer the things I want, could I ask: - how reliable is the eye-AF for relatively still subjects, talking head, ie in a 20min interview ...

24-105 - reasonable macro capability, you can always crop, very useful all rounder, and you can pick up a great manual macro like the Samyang 100mm for pretty cheap, or adapt an old third party macro.

Since some people find 1.4 too big and heavy, and some find 1.8 too slow/not quite nice enough bokeh but small enough that they'd probably be fine with *a bit* more size/weight, why does no one...

Had sony ff since the original a7, 5 bodies in total, only two wet cleans, dust has never been an issue at all for me, I don't even often need the blower. Tony's experience is not remotely like mine.

Surprising. Would much prefer f2 primes, unless, like loxia and voigtlander, they have exceptional character and iq. Odd choice from tamron.

I would sell the apsc glass, but an a7iii and spend the savings on ff glass. 7iii is a superb all rounder at a great price. Don't know your needs but good value glass - the 55, the tammy 28-75, ...

Some nice touches (new grip, new tracking, eye AF in video) but can't help being a little disappointed by this release, even tho i'll probably buy it at some point. No focus bracketing, no hdr or...

Both great lenses. I would watch the youtube vids on the different functions, think which ones will apply to you most, map them to the function menu, my menu and custom buttons, then after using ...

Big disappointment. If Sony don't provide a major jump in video for the 7siii, think i'm going to have to jump ship, they are just not providing competitive video any more. There is more to ...

I'm selling mine, beautiful rendering but is just so big and cumbersome to use i find myself using the little 55mm much more, which doesn't render as nice but I just enjoy the ease of something so ...

Big disappointment. I shoot Sony FF but was hoping for something like the XT3 to buy as a B cam - but this just doesn't compare. And at this price, jesus, no ten bit, no proper flip screen, no...

The HDR and long exposure aps available for the 7rii worked very well and made all filters except a polariser largely redundant. If third party developers could make these, why can't Sony? I ...