mbcrutcher

mbcrutcher

Lives in United States Seattle, United States
Works as a Retired lawyer and businessman
Has a website at None
Joined on Mar 31, 2011
About me:

I have owned Leicas and used them for over 50 years, so have personally seen great changes in photography.

My first real job was as a camera and film salesman at the Seattle World's Fair in 1962. I'd just graduated from High School and was very proud of earning $85 a week. This was a summer job before I headed off to Yale.

The principal occupation of a camera salesman in those days was to sell film (we charged an outrageous price, and I would whisper to unhappy customers that they could buy it cheaper outside the fairgrounds.) One also had to be good at changing film, which was a mystery to many people. Often the confused customer had already opened the camera and made an unsuccessful effort to remove the exposed film. I got very good at deciphering how to rewind, properly remove and insert new film in a variety of cameras.

Most of the cameras were box cameras of various sorts, mostly made by Kodak. There were still a lot of Brownie "Hawkeye" cameras in use. We'd see the occasional Rolleiflex, Argus, Kodak Retina and Contax. Maybe someone came in with a Leica, but I had one at the time and would have remembered if that had been the case.

The vast bulk of the cameras used 120, 127 or 620 film, designations which probably mean nothing to most photographers today. Photographers using 35 mm cameras invariably had slide film, an item no longer available. The big revolution was Kodak "Kodachrome II" slide film, which had the amazing speed of 25, up from 10 in the original Kodachrome.

The biggest event of the World's Fair was the visit of Elvis Presley. He was there to film a movie. One of his scenes was done in front of our store (though the store wasn't in it.) We got on the roof of the store and yelled down to Elvis to look up at us. He did and my good friend Ken (not me) got a great photo.

The change in equipment since 1962 is enormous. At that time the single lens reflex camera was replacing the rangefinder. Leica was too slow to hop on the SLR bandwagon. I owned their first effort, a Leicaflex. It was heavy as a brick, had a wonderful viewfinder, but I never thought it took very sharp pictures.

Leica was also slow to hop on the digital bandwagon, as well, but has made great strides. I think the top line Leica digital cameras are the best 35 mm full-frame cameras around. I am disappointed that Leica does not make a lighter weight model that accommodates legacy lens, though. I have an SL, love its picture quality, but its heavy weight makes me dread hauling it around.

I must say I have ambivalent feelings about digital photography. I have no idea what to do with my digital archive, and suspect it will evaporate when I'm gone. I'm in the process now of reviewing, editing and arranging my slide collection, which stretches from the 1950's through the early 1990's. At least slides are tangible. And some of the colors are fantastic.

I'm unhappy with the complexity of digital cameras. It's a relief for me to return to film photography. Set the exposure, shutter speed and focus -- that's it. What a relief one doesn't have to sift through menu after menu, or find your camera is doing something inexplicably weird.

Photography has been an important part of my life. Unfortunately, I haven't seemed to imbue my children with a similar love. They use iPhones to photograph all the time. The iPhone has an outstanding lens (mine is the 6plus, and I understand the 7 is even better.) But almost by definition iPhone photography is haphazard. One seizes the moment -- great. But one does not go out with an iPhone to take pictures, as one does with a camera.

I'm giving two of my children Leicas for Christmas. Maybe they'll find out what a rewarding experience photography can be. (I'm not ignoring my third child -- he gets a canoe!)

mbcrutcher's recent activity

  • Thanks for your comments.  As an M240 owner (the Safari model) I like my camera a lot and would need to see a noticeable improvement in image quality for the M10 before switching. Your newly posted ...
  • Thank you for the fine pictures.  How would you compare image quality of the M10 compared with the M240? Michael
  • Replied in Irakly
    I come late to this discussion to make a point that I think is important: I have not read the post that got Irakly in trouble with DPR, but if the post was a critique of a photograph, banning him ...
  • Michael, These shots look great to me! When we speak of the need to prefocus for a certain distance, we are only doing what film photographers did for years before the advent of autofocus. It ...
  • Replied in Let me explain
    Well, that's a good point, and I will examine some M10 files against those of my 240.  I do feel the color reproduction by my SL is better than that of the 240.  So if the M10 is in the same ...
  • I meant by that a customer who does not measure cost in considering the factors in purchasing a camera. How do you expect to advance an argument by attacking the author of a post?  Or is that ...
  • Are you referring to "Exposure Compensation?"  I always understood that to be for special lighting conditions.  The camera as shipped should produce the correct exposure with the exposure ...
  • Irakly, I agree looking at the view screen in the camera store is not an honest test, but on the other hand, I must tell you that the M10 I used was consistently underexposing, and neither I nor ...
  • I would like to divide your question into three parts: 1.  Why digital instead of film? 2.  Why a digital Leica instead of another digital camera? 3.  Why the M10 versus an M240 or other Leica ...
  • This is a terrific photo.  It really captures the character of this gentleman.  And I applaud photographers who approach homeless people and request, respectfully, to photograph them.  To me it ...
  • The flaws in this initial version of the camera are pretty well described, but I thought the images posted in the DPR review were terrific! Wonderful colors! How can a camera that makes such good...

  • Godfrey, Good question.  I don't own either the MP or the MA but I've handled both and liked the MA better.  I also found the viewfinder brighter, but maybe that's my imagination. I shoot film with ...
  • Very nice shots, thank you.  Beautiful color and wonderful subjects. Am curious, however, you had a guide "to keep out of trouble."  What were you worried about? Second question, am thinking of ...
  • Very nice set of photos. Did they come straight out of the camera or did you make post processing? Thanks, Michael
  • I've read about MS lenses but can anyone testify as to what makes them special, apart from being cheaper comparable Leica lenses?
  • Replied in New leica TL
    This may be old news but the original Leica T had great promise that was let down, in my opinion, by an unreliable autofocus.  I consistently found that as many as one out of 10 images were out of ...
  • I would interpret your question to mean this: assuming I buy the SL, should I also buy the 24-90 mm zoom or spend an equivalent amount on other lenses?  Which route provides the better utilization ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Total messages 86
Threads started 9
Last post 3 months ago
Total comments 3
Total likes 3
Last post 7 months ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 5
Last upload Jun 18, 2012