-
Excellent set! Congratulations. Thanks Rich!
-
I only have my smartphone to look at your pictures. But I can say they are really nice. Thanks for posting! And I agree about the P7100. I still have mine.
-
Thank you for chiming in. I installed the 8.7 version of Gcam (since it is available for the Pixel 7) and ARCIDE LIB. I didn't have time to test deeply, but the results look very good so far. I'll ...
-
Thanks for your patience and help. I have installed Gcam 8.7 and ARCIDE LIB. So far, I'm pleased with the first results (jpegs). I need to test more deeply, but I'll be very busy for a couple of ...
-
These are really excellent images. Can I use MATTEO22LIB on my Pixel 7? If I can, could you please give me some guidance? Thanks!
-
I do use raw, and find it very difficult to get better result than jpegs. Yet, I have a long experience in processing raw files with my cameras. What surprises me is that I get inconsistant ...
-
This is a great picture. I love it. I didn't know Even longer app. Looks interesting. Thanks for sharing.
-
Hi Gary, I've used the original 10-30 for a while before I switched to the PD model (which came with the J5). No problem at all. It is not as sharp as the PD, but very good nonetheless. And I like ...
-
You're right, Tord. I didn't notice the small ship was moving. You have a better eye than me! Apologies, Sangster!
-
Very interesting set of images. I like these photos. On a technicial side, even if it doesn't matter much, why do you use iso 800, when you could use 200?
-
Nice pictures. I'm not fond of birds images. I like your friend's picture, and the snack vendor. Excellent job with the V2 and 10-100!
-
Wow! I like them all, but #3 and #4 are my favourites. Very nice pictures. Enjoy the P7000, a great camera!
-
Hi, I performed some tests with your suggested settings So far, this is what I can say: Gcam gives better details (particularly visible in foliage, where the stock camera smears details, while Gcam ...
-
Sorry Tord, no idea. Can' t be due to dirty contacts, since the 18-55 works fine on both cameras...
-
I prefer the first for the composition. IMO, it's the most interesting. But, like Tord said, it's a bit overexposed. Exposure is perfect in the last two. Anyway, nice job, Marco!
-
This is a very nice image. I like it. Thanks for sharing. But...You didn't take just one, did you? Why don't you post more?
-
Not to my knowledge. I think that this kind of feature is not OS dependant. It is rather a feature that can be implemented by the phone manufacturer. That said, if you have an Android phone, it is ...
-
Thank you. No HDR settings appear in the top menu, only in advanced settings. And then, I have the choice to activate HDRnet or not. That's all. I should try with or without this activation to see ...
-
OK. Thank you. I'll give it a go tomorrow. I'm afraid it's too late now here. Note that I can't set HDR enhanced. No HDR setting in the viewfinder curtain.
-
True... If we look at the 2nd image, I wonder why the camera (or you, Bob?) chose these settings: 1/3200 sec, f/2.8, ISO 400. I don't know the equivalent FL of 14.5 mm, but did you really need ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
11224 |
Threads started |
780 |
Last post |
1 day ago |
Total reviews |
3 |
Last review |
Apr 8, 2012 |
Entries |
2 |
Votes cast |
2 |
Last entry |
Jan 27, 2019 |
Photos uploaded |
991 |
Last upload |
Jan 27, 2019 |
|