André BARELIER

Excellent set! Congratulations. Thanks Rich!

I only have my smartphone to look at your pictures. But I can say they are really nice. Thanks for posting! And I agree about the P7100. I still have mine.

Thank you for chiming in. I installed the 8.7 version of Gcam (since it is available for the Pixel 7) and ARCIDE LIB. I didn't have time to test deeply, but the results look very good so far. I'll ...

Thanks for your patience and help. I have installed Gcam 8.7 and ARCIDE LIB. So far, I'm pleased with the first results (jpegs). I need to test more deeply, but I'll be very busy for a couple of ...

These are really excellent images. Can I use MATTEO22LIB on my Pixel 7? If I can, could you please give me some guidance? Thanks!

I do use raw, and find it very difficult to get better result than jpegs. Yet, I have a long experience in processing raw files with my cameras. What surprises me is that I get inconsistant ...

This is a great picture. I love it. I didn't know Even longer app. Looks interesting. Thanks for sharing.

Hi Gary, I've used the original 10-30 for a while before I switched to the PD model (which came with the J5). No problem at all. It is not as sharp as the PD, but very good nonetheless. And I like ...

You're right, Tord. I didn't notice the small ship was moving. You have a better eye than me! Apologies, Sangster!

Very interesting set of images. I like these photos. On a technicial side, even if it doesn't matter much, why do you use iso 800, when you could use 200?

Nice pictures. I'm not fond of birds images. I like your friend's picture, and the snack vendor. Excellent job with the V2 and 10-100!

Wow! I like them all, but #3 and #4 are my favourites. Very nice pictures. Enjoy the P7000, a great camera!

Hi, I performed some tests with your suggested settings So far, this is what I can say: Gcam gives better details (particularly visible in foliage, where the stock camera smears details, while Gcam ...

Sorry Tord, no idea. Can' t be due to dirty contacts, since the 18-55 works fine on both cameras...

I prefer the first for the composition. IMO, it's the most interesting. But, like Tord said, it's  a bit overexposed. Exposure is perfect in the last two. Anyway, nice job, Marco!

This is a very nice image. I like it. Thanks for sharing. But...You didn't take just one, did you? Why don't you post more?

Not to my knowledge. I think that this kind of feature is not OS dependant. It is rather a feature that can be implemented by the phone manufacturer. That said, if you have an Android phone, it is ...

Thank you. No HDR settings appear in the top menu, only in advanced settings. And then, I have the choice to activate HDRnet or not. That's all. I should try with or without this activation to see ...

OK. Thank you. I'll give it a go tomorrow. I'm afraid it's too late now here. Note that I can't set HDR enhanced. No HDR setting in the viewfinder curtain.

True... If we look at the 2nd image, I wonder why the camera (or you, Bob?) chose these settings: 1/3200 sec, f/2.8, ISO 400. I don't know the equivalent FL of 14.5 mm, but did you really need ...