debo

The 18mm is underrated ... unless you want straight lines on a closeup shot near the edges :) The 27mm is a no nonsense prime pancake. As long as you are ok with f/2.8 and software correction, you ...

There is some distortion at the extreme corners, nothing to worry about in the center of the frame. BTW I have a FF 35mm RX1 too and while the lens is mind-blowing, there is distortion at the ...

14mm has a clutch ... once you pull it, you will see the distance scale on the lens body, exposed.

Nice pictures as always! I bought the 14mm (selling my Zeiss 12) due to the lack of distortion (and am happy with the output). Is the 16mm optically corrected or is it like the 35/2? I see that the ...

makes it harder and harder to resist :) thx for the nudge!

I went to Tokyo with only my RX1 (could have taken my X100 too). I felt the need for a wide at times so 14 16 18 would all be good. But 35mm was good enough overall. When I was atop the Tokyo ...

I really want a lightweight kit hence for a 4 lens kit: 14/2.8 23/1.4 or X100 or a RX1 (and only RX1 if my weight budget is 500g) 35/1.4 56 (or 60 as its lighter) For a 2 lens kit, 14 + 23, For a 3 ...

Saw your pics, they are awesome ..... But was wondering how different would be the results if you had chosen to use the 23mm since you had the 10-24 anyway. I have the 14mm and its so light and ...

If you like Zeiss rendering, go for it. I have used Contax Zeiss lenses and the output feels a lot like the CY 50mm .... but with autofocus. Fuji renders differently. The Zeiss is sharper wide ...

works w A7 and has AF w Pentax.I find the FA limiteds as good as the Zeiss glass except for the modern Milvus line

I had the XT10 but replaced it with a XE2 when FW4 was out. I love both but I like the position of the EVF. If you like the look of the X100, get the XE2s (or XE2). The 35/1.4 is a must have. Since ...

I have done Paris with 1 lens at a time but I took setups - XA1+16-50 and a RX1. One day I took the 16-50 cheap zoom and on another day I left my Fuji kit and took my RX1 ..... both were equally ...

Got it ... thx. ... this is one of the reasons I feel that for people, 23mm is perfect - least distortion ... hence leaning towards a 23/1.4 but I can see that the 16 is a better all rounder

Very nice indeed! I have the 14 and while it has 0 distortion there is perspective distortion and if I am not careful people at the edge of the frame don't look great. Do I need to worry about ...

Thx but not ready to go with a heavy zoom yet. Also f/2.8 is slow :) Also 90 is too narrow. Have been happy with my x100 + 56 except for the AF speed of the X100. Hence I will replace the x100 ...

Nice captures as usual. Quick question - you seem to have the 14 16 and 23. When do you use the 16 vs the 23? How is the distortion on the 16? I have a 18 and I love it except for the edge ...

Since I have a kid, I get asked to be the photog for several kiddo birthday events. My friends know I have some weird film like camera and not a Canikon and want that look :) I oblige. Often the ...

Am not interested in the 35/2 except for the WR since most of my pics are at f/1.4 ... I like the dreamy look

maybe thats why long ago P did these 31 - wide/landscape 43 - normal 77 - portait As of now, it seems its the "best starter kit" :) Then add 15-30 for perspective and 150-450 for reach. I am ...

Will probably start with primes .... then maybe 15-30 and 70-200 or 150-450. I wish Tamron made a 150-600 for Pentax. I want that lens.... for my FF kit, I want to decide the UWA and super tele ...