Pixel Pooper

The 35mm is my most used lens by far, but if you are keeping the 50mm I would go for the 24 or 28 instead because 35 and 50 are a bit too close in focal length. I sold my 50 and kept the 35 ...

I'm not seeing much difference. Here is a 300% crop of your ISO 1600 image on the left compared to an ISO 3200 image from the A6000 on the right.

A lot of people have moved on to the newer models, but I still love my A6000. It is still the bang for buck champ and is a huge upgrade over the NEX-6. The A6000 and SEL35 is my most used combo ...

What type of macro photography are you doing that needs this type of lighting? Most people prefer using flash for macro.

The circle of confusion is not affected by pixel density because the COC is bigger than the pixel size.

The DOF calculators are correct. Using the same focal length, aperture, and subject distance on APS-C is the same as cropping an FF image, and when you crop an image and then display it at the ...

Sony has not made the E mount specs open. They are available to approved manufacturers who pay a fee only. Metabones has not been approved and neither has any other adapter manufacturer as far as ...

They were both saying the same thing, your expert just didn't say it as clearly. Here is Wikipedia's definition: " Depth of focus is a lens optics concept that measures the tolerance of placement ...

We weren't, we were both talking about depth of field. Maybe you should have just stayed out of it if you didn't have anything relevant to add.

Nobody was talking about depth of focus, we were talking about depth of field. Depth of focus is not depth of field on the sensor, it is (from your link): "The range through which the image plane ...

They could do it if they wanted to. They don't.

DOF is a perceptual phenomenon that depends on viewing conditions including display size, so there is no DOF until the image is viewed. The only way that DOF exists on the sensor is if you view a ...

There is no such thing. Yes, that's what DOF is. We are disagreeing because one of us is wrong and one isn't.

If the FF is cropped to APS-C size then yes the DOF will be the same, but then you are not comparing crop vs FF anymore which is what we were talking about. Of course it is, anyone with a basic ...

With the same framing, depth of field will be the same at the same f/stop, but the longer focal length will blur the background more.

I never mentioned exposure or illumination, but to shoot equivalent pictures you need to use the equivalent ISO as well as equivalent exposure settings. No need to violate anything.

Not sure why you dig up this old post to disagree with it, but every word is true, just as it was a year ago when I wrote it.

It does not agree with what you said because the DOF is the same.

The exposure will be the same, but the field of view and depth of field will not. With the same f/stop and the same subject distance the FF will have a wider FOV and deeper DOF.

The ability to share lenses is a big plus, so I would go for the Canon. The Fuji has a "classic" control layout that is great for people suffering from film era nostalgia, but is ergonomically ...