ET2

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 1236, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Alpha-better: Sony a9 versus a7R II (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Azimuth46: The real big problem with Sony A9 is not performance but price. Specs are excellent but they are nothing more than specs of an high-level full frame DSLR.

Like a Canon 5Dmk4 or a Nikon D810 to name a few. So the price should be around 3500$ to be competitive, and not 4500$ or even 5300€ as it's in EU. What this camera is capable of is simply what a very good DSRL is already been able of. Just in an EVIL body. Apart from 20fps, which frankly are not so interesting even for sport pro shooters who rarely shoot more than 8fps because they have really short time to review all their footage.

And probably it will sell very well for a very short period of time then it will lose its value just because of what I've said. Time will tell.

For me it seems to be ah hell of a camera but it's truly overpriced.

DPR has a a lot of criticism of 1DX AF tracking. Are you claiming the lower end Canon has better AF than their flagship camera? See Rishi's youtube video on low light AF on A7RII where in the end they use D810. Rishi claims D810 lowlight AF is worse. You seem to be very quick in picking critical comments on A7RII in reviews but don't don't seem to care about critical comments on what you claim are "flagship DSLRs."

Didn't A7Rii overall score higher than both of these cameras in DPReview?

A7RII has a better sensor, way better video, more AF points that cover more of the sensor, silent shutter mode, etc etc. That's the camera that you need to compare to 5dIV and D810, and A7Rii beats them in most cases. Scores higher in DPReview.

Why are you comparing A9 to these cameras when A7Rii already beatees them?

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 15:42 UTC
On article Alpha-better: Sony a9 versus a7R II (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Azimuth46: The real big problem with Sony A9 is not performance but price. Specs are excellent but they are nothing more than specs of an high-level full frame DSLR.

Like a Canon 5Dmk4 or a Nikon D810 to name a few. So the price should be around 3500$ to be competitive, and not 4500$ or even 5300€ as it's in EU. What this camera is capable of is simply what a very good DSRL is already been able of. Just in an EVIL body. Apart from 20fps, which frankly are not so interesting even for sport pro shooters who rarely shoot more than 8fps because they have really short time to review all their footage.

And probably it will sell very well for a very short period of time then it will lose its value just because of what I've said. Time will tell.

For me it seems to be ah hell of a camera but it's truly overpriced.

"Sony α7R2 is just a very high MP FF mirrorless camera with a very good sensor (because of BSI tech)."

Just high MP camera? What does that mean? A7RII video blows the crap of D810 and 5D Mark IV. It has also ver good AF. Read the DPRreview. The lowlight AF is better than D810 according to DPRreview. See Rish video on that. The sensor is better too.

You still haven't explained why you are comparing A9 to D810 and 5D IV and not A7RII which is already a better camera than both.

A9 is marketed as a faster camera than D5 and 1Dx. A7rII already beats D810 and 5DIVx

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 15:00 UTC
On article Alpha-better: Sony a9 versus a7R II (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Edmond Leung: If Sony is lucky, we may see two or three Sony cameras in the next Olympic Game.

There were far more Sony video cameras in 2016 Rio Olympics than that

https://blog.sony.com/press/nbc-olympics-selects-sony-to-provide-broadcast-and-production-equipment-for-its-coverage-of-the-2016-olympic-games-in-rio/

"NBC Olympics crews will use more than 100 Sony cameras to capture footage at event venues and record athlete arrivals, interviews, press conferences and other assignments that require studio and portable recording and capture. NBC Olympics will also use Sony’s HDC-4300 4K high frame rate camera system for HD replays and the PWS-4500 XAVC server to capture and store high speed HD content from the HDC-4300."

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 10:29 UTC
On article Alpha-better: Sony a9 versus a7R II (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Azimuth46: The real big problem with Sony A9 is not performance but price. Specs are excellent but they are nothing more than specs of an high-level full frame DSLR.

Like a Canon 5Dmk4 or a Nikon D810 to name a few. So the price should be around 3500$ to be competitive, and not 4500$ or even 5300€ as it's in EU. What this camera is capable of is simply what a very good DSRL is already been able of. Just in an EVIL body. Apart from 20fps, which frankly are not so interesting even for sport pro shooters who rarely shoot more than 8fps because they have really short time to review all their footage.

And probably it will sell very well for a very short period of time then it will lose its value just because of what I've said. Time will tell.

For me it seems to be ah hell of a camera but it's truly overpriced.

Azimuth46, why aren't you comparing A7RII with Canon 5Dmk4 and Nikon D810? A7RII has a better sensor (dxomark, more resolution), and far better video than both of these cameras.

A9 is high-speed sports camera (at least that's what Sony claims) that supposedly competes against D5 and 1Dx, something the reviewers will have to test. Both these cameras are more expensive than A9.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 03:03 UTC
On article Alpha-better: Sony a9 versus a7R II (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

rev32: I'm interested. One point to bring out: It is only 20 fps in certain specific situations. Uncompressed raw for instance is 12 fps. Darn fast, but not 20 fps. Folks might get the wrong impression unless they go to the Sony website and read the footnotes.

More importantly, pro sports and news shooters are shooting jpegs. They send thousands of images to editors either live or within a short time frame so images can be selected and published right away. There is no time or bandwidth for raw.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2017 at 15:18 UTC
On article Alpha-better: Sony a9 versus a7R II (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

rubank: Samsung NX-1 came years ago, with specs in some ways better compared to the new Sony, together with (only) two excellent lenses. Still, they didn´t make it in the market. Why would Sony A9?

Why? All Sony cameras outsold Samsung 10 to 1 according to Flickr stats for past several years, so your comparison is idiotic. Sony isn't Samsung

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2017 at 14:37 UTC
On article Alpha-better: Sony a9 versus a7R II (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Azimuth46: The real big problem with Sony A9 is not performance but price. Specs are excellent but they are nothing more than specs of an high-level full frame DSLR.

Like a Canon 5Dmk4 or a Nikon D810 to name a few. So the price should be around 3500$ to be competitive, and not 4500$ or even 5300€ as it's in EU. What this camera is capable of is simply what a very good DSRL is already been able of. Just in an EVIL body. Apart from 20fps, which frankly are not so interesting even for sport pro shooters who rarely shoot more than 8fps because they have really short time to review all their footage.

And probably it will sell very well for a very short period of time then it will lose its value just because of what I've said. Time will tell.

For me it seems to be ah hell of a camera but it's truly overpriced.

"Canon 5Dmk4 or a Nikon D810"

A7Rii has better specs than both of these cameras (higher resolution, better sensor, better video) A9 has better specs than 1Dx and D5, both more expensive than A9.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2017 at 14:29 UTC

A $20 bill and a few $1 bills as a background image? Didn't you guys have a few $100 bills to use?

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2017 at 23:43 UTC as 84th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Sdaniella: OK
Sony has baited you with a new FF A9 as "pro sports" 24mp hi-continuous 20fps

thus, elevating what essentially is

Full-Res 24mp MJPEG (or Compressed RAW) VIDEO @ 20p (no audio; no s-log) w/AF-C
Full-Res 24mp UN-compressed RAW VIDEO @ ONLY 12p (no audio; no s-log) w/AF-C

to "pro sports" STILLS status ... impressive ?

nope. this is just PR fancy talk
i.e. 24mp hi-res but ultra LOW frame rate video (no audio)

thus making even the humble EOS 5DMkIV dSLR with mere 4k MJPEG VIDEO
also elevated to "pro sports" status !
gee, thank you SONY "fancy PR"!

albeit, PRO SPORTS w/Touch Screen PDAF (Subject Follow; Cinematic AF Racking)
with audio @ 24 fps, 25fps (PAL), 30 fps (NTSC)*
without audio @ 50 fps (PAL), 60 fps (NTSC)* =WOW!
*optional C-Log (*yay*)

who needs
RAW (compressed or uncompresssed) or JPEG FF full-res 30Mp STILLS @ 7fps ?
when 4k MJPEG will do fine for PRO SPORTS!
5DMkIV
24 fps w/audio
60 fps w/o audio
use lighter (wider) FL lens (1.641x crop)

pick still frame "as needed"

Sdaniell, pro sports only shoot jpegs. They don't shoot raw, as they are sending thousands of images sometimes live and some time with strict time restrictions. So 20 fps jpegs is just fine for pro sports shooter. A9 even does compressed raw with 20 fps, which won't be used by pro shooters anyway, as they are shooting jpegs. Same is true with news photographers. They are sending thousands of jpegs to editors quickly for publications right away, as as news is either live or is being published in hours. No raws are used there.

20 fps jpegs and compressed raws is something no other FF camera can do.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2017 at 16:30 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: I had a thought today (happens sometimes) and that is that the more diversified a company is, the more likely it is to abruptly drop its camera component if profits falter there. That makes Sony and Canon as likely candidates as any to say goodbye to cameras, and Nikon less likely to bail. Highly diversified Samsung was building great cameras, but wasn't making money off them - so bye-bye.

The division that made broadcast equipment (CineAlta, FS7, all another kind of broadcast gear) and still camera division like that which makes Alpha and cybershot merged as one "Imaging division" in 2012

https://www.theverge.com/2012/3/27/2905412/sony-management-structure-change-announcement

"Under the new plan, the separate professional and consumer product and service groups will disappear, which is probably what gave rise to the aspirational name. "

Sony has never lost money in Imaging Division. The sensors did lose money though (and was different division).

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2017 at 11:28 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: I had a thought today (happens sometimes) and that is that the more diversified a company is, the more likely it is to abruptly drop its camera component if profits falter there. That makes Sony and Canon as likely candidates as any to say goodbye to cameras, and Nikon less likely to bail. Highly diversified Samsung was building great cameras, but wasn't making money off them - so bye-bye.

Fujica, you are a liar. If you had been working for them, you would not have been posting nonense. Sensors were under devices division which has lost money. The pro video division (which makes broadcast cameras and other broadcast equipment) merged with still cameras division and were renamed Imaging division a few years ago. Stop being a moron, dude. Don't post about topics you know nothing about. I never said sensors were under Imaging division. Sensors lost money and were a different division.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2017 at 11:17 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: I had a thought today (happens sometimes) and that is that the more diversified a company is, the more likely it is to abruptly drop its camera component if profits falter there. That makes Sony and Canon as likely candidates as any to say goodbye to cameras, and Nikon less likely to bail. Highly diversified Samsung was building great cameras, but wasn't making money off them - so bye-bye.

Fujica, it's not a separate division. All of them (pro video, stills) merged as one called Imaging division a few years ago, and no Sony has not lost money in Imaging division for several years. Look it up. They did lose money on sensors, even last year or a year before they lost money in Devices division, and sensors were part of that division.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 19:35 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: I had a thought today (happens sometimes) and that is that the more diversified a company is, the more likely it is to abruptly drop its camera component if profits falter there. That makes Sony and Canon as likely candidates as any to say goodbye to cameras, and Nikon less likely to bail. Highly diversified Samsung was building great cameras, but wasn't making money off them - so bye-bye.

Still cameras are an integral part of pro imaging division as video and stills are integrating, all the way down to sensors and imaging processors, both use same parts. There is no separation. That's one of the reasons these cameras aren't disappearing in your lifetime. The whole division has been profitable (unlike sensor where they have lost money several times).

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 17:57 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: I had a thought today (happens sometimes) and that is that the more diversified a company is, the more likely it is to abruptly drop its camera component if profits falter there. That makes Sony and Canon as likely candidates as any to say goodbye to cameras, and Nikon less likely to bail. Highly diversified Samsung was building great cameras, but wasn't making money off them - so bye-bye.

Sony Digital Imaging includes all the pro gear they make for Holywood and broadcast industry. It's a core part of their business. Plus it's been profitable for last 5 years. It's not going anywhere in your lifetime.

Devices division (sensors were part of that division) did lose money a few times last 5 years, but Imaging division did not.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 17:18 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1909 comments in total)
In reply to:

falconeyes: > The new α9 also supports uncompressed 14-bit RAW, ensuring users can get the most out of the wide dynamic range of the sensor.

Still no lossless compressed raw.

falconeyes, is no one using D810 and K1 in studio with this technique as both do 5 fps, same as A9. A9 can do 20 fps where flash isn't used, something the other two cameras can't do.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 16:31 UTC
On article Sony a9 first look videos (301 comments in total)
In reply to:

AdrianPocea: I just bought my Canon 5D Mark 4 and my gh5 recently for the same price as a Sony A9 with a battery grip . Both have great battery life , dual card slots and while Sony must be a great camera at least on paper because nobody tried it yet there is no way that this camera would be better than my both bodies combined that I have right now , which are pretty much at the top of the food chain in photography and videography so happy buying group Sony

On the other hand, I would rather carry one small camera than two large cameras everywhere I go. Even then, I am pretty sure lowlight video on A9 beats both cameras.

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2017 at 18:19 UTC
In reply to:

walgarch: Seriously guys, how long have people been saying Pentax is doomed? We're at 'the boy who cried wolf' levels now. The camera market has been a mess for years now, and Pentax has stuck around. I'm really not sure what kind of proof you guys need anymore lol

You can still post there, or email admins Simon Joinson

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2017 at 13:02 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1909 comments in total)
In reply to:

Biowizard: CIPA Battery Life of 650; max 20 FPS shooting rate ... Yikes! I could drain that battery flat in 32.5 seconds! Wonder how warm it would get?!

Brian

Nomoreheroes

https://twitter.com/dpreview/status/855156759446638593

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2017 at 04:49 UTC
In reply to:

walgarch: Seriously guys, how long have people been saying Pentax is doomed? We're at 'the boy who cried wolf' levels now. The camera market has been a mess for years now, and Pentax has stuck around. I'm really not sure what kind of proof you guys need anymore lol

You can always report Mako to DPR admins. Use feedback forum to complain

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2017 at 04:48 UTC
In reply to:

KyleSlamchez: Okay, hold the phone! The actual full specifications state that it only shoots 5fps with the physical shutter. Five frames per second!

The Nikon D5 shoots 12fps. The Canon 1DX II shoots 14fps!

I thought something was goofy. This is looking more and more like just an a7s ii with dual card slots, a larger buffer, and less resolution.

https://twitter.com/dpreview/status/855078961193385984

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 18:20 UTC
Total: 1236, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »