ET2

Joined on Aug 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 1259, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Didn't last long. Google pixel 2 beats both by 4 points.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2017 at 17:39 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon D850 added to studio scene comparison (464 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Ma: Look at all the detail the 5D Mark IV missed by having an AA filter. Tsk tsk.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=nikon_d850&attr13_1=canon_eos5dmkiv&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=canon_eos5dsr&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=64&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=100&attr16_3=100&attr171_2=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.5188665165124419&y=0.38872096403182343

You don't need Pentax K1 in pixel shift mode to see the scene. Use the reference camera Phase One IQ180. That's a benchmark camera and why it's there, so other cameras can be compared to the benchmark.

Pixel shift has a very limited practical use, and requires a tripod, and still scene. D850 is a far more versatile camera.

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2017 at 17:03 UTC
On article Nikon D850 added to studio scene comparison (464 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Ma: Look at all the detail the 5D Mark IV missed by having an AA filter. Tsk tsk.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=nikon_d850&attr13_1=canon_eos5dmkiv&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=canon_eos5dsr&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=64&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=100&attr16_3=100&attr171_2=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.5188665165124419&y=0.38872096403182343

It's moire, not extra detail. So Canon looks better there.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2017 at 13:38 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Funny thing. For much less that the $1700 asking price I can buy an SLR and a perfectly good wide-range zoom.

Newsflash: I can use other lenses with an SLR too. And it also has phase-detection AF. Just imagine that.

SLR with lenses doesn't offer the same convenience for people who have no time to carry a bunch of lenses and change lenses in the middle of the trip. It's surely isn't the same thing.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2017 at 18:22 UTC
In reply to:

ET2: That's why medium format cameras don't need 16 bit. It's just waste of space and marketing ploy. Some like Pentax 645D don't even need 14 bit, as they have low DR sensors.

no, A7s doesn't need 16 bit at base ISO

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2017 at 04:54 UTC

That's why medium format cameras don't need 16 bit. It's just waste of space and marketing ploy. Some like Pentax 645D don't even need 14 bit, as they have low DR sensors.

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2017 at 17:32 UTC as 72nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

justmeMN: DPR has an article about Sony's positive financial results, but didn't say a word about Canon's previously announced positive financial results. And DPR wonders why some people think that it has a pro-Sony bias.

"This is because Sony has had a prolongued period of poor results a"

Not true as Sony camera division has not been negative in last 7 years. It always made money at least since 2010.

Link | Posted on Aug 1, 2017 at 19:46 UTC
In reply to:

Majauskasson: Nice ad for Sony but resolution C+. You'll see this clip on their ads soon. Any half decent camera will do the same. Sony outbid Nikon and others for the rights and NASA can use the cash. Let's remember the NASA LRO circling the moon at 25 miles up photoshopped the non-existent fake Apollo landers in to keep the gullible Apollo nuts happy. If you believe the blobs are landers remember that amateurs with backyard telescopes got excellent resolution too. DP has shown these. NASA has been and still is scamming the world. It cancelled the manned Mars mission because it "can't protect astronauts from space radiation". Well, what about Apollo? How did they manage it? Using 1960s technology then it was no problem - 6 men to the moon in 3 years. Now with powerful computers NASA is stymied. Space is tough. NASA lied and created a fantasy Apollo story many believe to this day.

Please take your medicine.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2017 at 17:59 UTC
In reply to:

IdM photography: Times are difficult if you need to invest today in a new system...
Will you choose to buy a DSLR, knowing that the future is mirrorless (with advantages related to size, weight and better lenses...)?
Or will you buy Sony Mirrorless, with a current range of lenses that may not cover your needs?
I think that Sony caught Canon and Nikon by surprise, with such a capable mirrorless camera... Neither Canon nor Nikon are producing any FF mirrorless camera...

IdM photography, all Canon EF lenses only need electronic contacts for the aperture control and autofocus. They don't need mechanical levers in the mounting mechanism. Not all Nikon lenses have that.

EF mount was introduced in 1987. Nikon F mount is much older.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2017 at 14:38 UTC
In reply to:

IdM photography: Times are difficult if you need to invest today in a new system...
Will you choose to buy a DSLR, knowing that the future is mirrorless (with advantages related to size, weight and better lenses...)?
Or will you buy Sony Mirrorless, with a current range of lenses that may not cover your needs?
I think that Sony caught Canon and Nikon by surprise, with such a capable mirrorless camera... Neither Canon nor Nikon are producing any FF mirrorless camera...

What lenses have you tested that don't work properly? On A7RII some lenses were even faster than on Canon cameras. A9 should be better. Is it 10 fps with Canon lenses? If so, that's still fast. Does it do 20 fps with Canon lenses with AF fixed on the first shot?

Link | Posted on May 4, 2017 at 11:23 UTC
In reply to:

IdM photography: Times are difficult if you need to invest today in a new system...
Will you choose to buy a DSLR, knowing that the future is mirrorless (with advantages related to size, weight and better lenses...)?
Or will you buy Sony Mirrorless, with a current range of lenses that may not cover your needs?
I think that Sony caught Canon and Nikon by surprise, with such a capable mirrorless camera... Neither Canon nor Nikon are producing any FF mirrorless camera...

Let's not forget all Cannon lenses work on E-mount cameras, including AF. So A9 has its native lenses, plus A-mount lenses, plus Canon lenses.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2017 at 10:06 UTC
In reply to:

Triplet Perar: On DPR was published a rumour that Ricoh is thinking into shutting down camera business "because of the losses". DPR published Ricoh's reply too, but went no extra mile, no extra 20 articles to dig more, see what is going on, because, imagine!, DPR may fear they may loose some valuable audience? Does DPR care about users of Ricoh's and Pentax cameras that come to DPR?

But there is TONS of coverage about one camera from one manufacturer. How disproportionate is that — care about one single product vs the future of an entire manufacturer and majority of their products?

That is one example I used to state DPR lost balance and reporter's cool. So instead of DPR, users of Ricoh Imaging's equipment must dig more, investigate what is the truth. In Ricoh's latest annual report, camera business division marked increase of sales (!) in fact. And, Ricoh is to repurpose some compact cams plants, and that is shown as cost, of course. How that squares with words in rumours? Who cares for truth?

"Triplet Perar: Are you OK"

Was he ever? He has been this way for past 10 years since I have seen him around. You should read some of his K01 comments. An amazing camera according to him which was the only profitable mirrorless camera because people at Ricoh are genius. They didn't invest in new mount and made tons of money by doing no R&D by being geniuses. All other fools (like Sony and M4/3) lost money, said Triplet Perar. He said that. A dozen times. He was using a different username back then.

Link | Posted on May 3, 2017 at 01:59 UTC
In reply to:

Triplet Perar: On DPR was published a rumour that Ricoh is thinking into shutting down camera business "because of the losses". DPR published Ricoh's reply too, but went no extra mile, no extra 20 articles to dig more, see what is going on, because, imagine!, DPR may fear they may loose some valuable audience? Does DPR care about users of Ricoh's and Pentax cameras that come to DPR?

But there is TONS of coverage about one camera from one manufacturer. How disproportionate is that — care about one single product vs the future of an entire manufacturer and majority of their products?

That is one example I used to state DPR lost balance and reporter's cool. So instead of DPR, users of Ricoh Imaging's equipment must dig more, investigate what is the truth. In Ricoh's latest annual report, camera business division marked increase of sales (!) in fact. And, Ricoh is to repurpose some compact cams plants, and that is shown as cost, of course. How that squares with words in rumours? Who cares for truth?

For anyone who doesn't know, Triplet Perar is a long time Pentax fanboy with various IDs over the years. He thinks a rumor about Ricoh shutting down their camera business and a major flagship FF camera with new features (first mirrorless cameras to compete against Pro sports DSLRs) both should have an equal amount of articles. Weird

Triplet Perar, why be so jealous? Don't worry. Ricoh will release a camera with good AF in 2117 :)

Link | Posted on May 3, 2017 at 00:37 UTC
In reply to:

Sunshine7913: The buffer is quite slow for press or sport uses. 36 sec to clear out? D5 takes only 5~10 sec to clear out all images with XQD.

You were the one trolling but I just destroyed you with facts and science. Dxomark. Go look it up.

D5 worse DR than APSC

Link | Posted on May 3, 2017 at 00:27 UTC
In reply to:

Sunshine7913: The buffer is quite slow for press or sport uses. 36 sec to clear out? D5 takes only 5~10 sec to clear out all images with XQD.

D5 lower image quality and no 20 fps. Stop ignoring the fact. even apsc cameras have more DR than d5

Link | Posted on May 3, 2017 at 00:13 UTC
In reply to:

Sunshine7913: The buffer is quite slow for press or sport uses. 36 sec to clear out? D5 takes only 5~10 sec to clear out all images with XQD.

no facts? I gave you facts. Go look up dxomark D5 has worse DR than all Sony 12 bit cameras (worse even than Sony's APSC cameras).

D5 no 20 fps. Fact 1
D5 worse than 12 bit DR. Fact 2

D5 = meaningless, conclusion

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 23:50 UTC
In reply to:

Sunshine7913: The buffer is quite slow for press or sport uses. 36 sec to clear out? D5 takes only 5~10 sec to clear out all images with XQD.

And you aren't for claiming 20 fps is "meaningless" even though I can shoot a whole 10 seconds 100-meter race on it, and keep shooting even after the buffer is full? D5 can't do 20 fps. You are the definition of a retarded moron.

You are whining about 12 bits on A9, but D5's DR is worse than 12 bit cameras. You are dumber than a stack of stones. That's worse than retarded.

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 23:29 UTC
In reply to:

Sunshine7913: The buffer is quite slow for press or sport uses. 36 sec to clear out? D5 takes only 5~10 sec to clear out all images with XQD.

oh yes, and I am using D5 here in USA and guess what? Its meaningless camera, just as I told you. No 20 fps and worse than 12 bits image quality. So there.

A9 that I am using here in USA destroys it. Now what?

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 22:59 UTC
In reply to:

Sunshine7913: The buffer is quite slow for press or sport uses. 36 sec to clear out? D5 takes only 5~10 sec to clear out all images with XQD.

"Then you are meaningless. I dont see your point for this conversation."

of course, you don't see the point anymore, after I destroyed your argument ;)

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 22:47 UTC
In reply to:

Sunshine7913: The buffer is quite slow for press or sport uses. 36 sec to clear out? D5 takes only 5~10 sec to clear out all images with XQD.

"It is meaningless since it has slower buffer speed and that's the biggest issue."

Even if buffer clearing is slower that doesn't make it "meaningless" as a person can shoot for 10 seconds straight which is a very long time, and they can shoot even if the buffer isn't fully cleared.

You know what's meaningless? D5 as it can't even do 20 fps so that makes it meaningless plus the image quality is worse than 12 bits. Double meaningless. So here.

D5 = meaningless

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 20:22 UTC
Total: 1259, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »