ET2

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 1130, showing: 301 – 320
« First‹ Previous1415161718Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ZeneticX: before anyone jumps on the hate train and starts saying this is a minor update compared to the 7RII..... thing is why should sony bother?

no camera currently in the market came close to the low light performance of the 7S. Changing the body and adding IBIS will do for now.

You are a troll. You claim to have taken photos in camera store. Either you are outright lying, or you have unscientific data.

In both cases, until you post proof, it's anecdotal evidence that don't count as evidence Take a basic class in logic.

A7s is about 1/3 stop better than DF according to raw and dxomark, both. That's in stills. In video the difference is bigger.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
In reply to:

KrisAK: Does Sony not provide review samples of their cameras prior to release?

"Hands-on" reports usually coincide with product announcements from Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, etc.; with Sony, we seem to be stuck waiting for anecdotal reports of dubious value. Making an informed purchase is something of a challenge.

A7s series is released by video division who seem to have no contact with DPR. A7s was released at NAB. DPR never posted any news when FS7 was released. Now there is no news on DPR about FS5.

It's seems there is zero contact between DPR and Sony video division.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 18:04 UTC
In reply to:

ZeneticX: before anyone jumps on the hate train and starts saying this is a minor update compared to the 7RII..... thing is why should sony bother?

no camera currently in the market came close to the low light performance of the 7S. Changing the body and adding IBIS will do for now.

HowaboutRAW, you are a troll because you make definite statements but provide zero evidence. That's a trollish behavior.

I will take dxomark over online trolls

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 16:54 UTC
In reply to:

ZeneticX: before anyone jumps on the hate train and starts saying this is a minor update compared to the 7RII..... thing is why should sony bother?

no camera currently in the market came close to the low light performance of the 7S. Changing the body and adding IBIS will do for now.

I will take dxomark over internet troll who posted no proof.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 16:24 UTC
In reply to:

ZeneticX: before anyone jumps on the hate train and starts saying this is a minor update compared to the 7RII..... thing is why should sony bother?

no camera currently in the market came close to the low light performance of the 7S. Changing the body and adding IBIS will do for now.

This is a VIDEO camera and A7s is two stops better than D4S in video mode.

So the poster you are replying is correct. No camera comes even close to A7s in lowlight video capability.

As for stills, according top dxomark A7s is better than both D4s and Df by 1/3 stop (your homegrown test that you did in camera shop doesn't count as you never posted proof and is just anecdotal baseless claim).

Regardless, A7s blows D4s in video low light capability. Here is A7s vs D4s side by side

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 16:15 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

You have not used logic, dummy. Posting anecdotal stories isn't evidence. That's just some internet idiot posting empty assertions. Evidence would be posting scientific reasoning on what part of lens creates or adds to color and how it does it, without engineers who made the lens knowing about that property of the lens.

"Some optical engineers do understand this point."

See? That's not a proof. That's an idiot making a statement without proof. Post the link, link to PDF, name these engineers. That's posting evidence.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, but there is no such thing.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 23:24 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

You have never posted a single evidence or even logical argument to back up your claim.

Just empty claims based on anecdotal evidence. Had you taken a basic class in logic , you would have known anecdotal evidence don't prove crap.

Where is that link to Nikon guy where he says anything about colors producing ability of lens? No where. Yet again empty idiotic statement, but not a shred of proof.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 22:45 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

The color on Foveon sensor has absolutely nothing to do with lenses. Foveon creatures RGB color output by combining the output of stacked diodes. What does that have do with lenses? Absolutely nothing.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 21:50 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

"And it's okay in my book that you think blue a lower frequency than red."

Something I never said. And what does that have to do with lens creating colors? Absolutely nothing.

"But really you need some good raws shot with Zeisses and then say Nikons under the same light."

More empty anecdotal statements.

color has nothing to do with lens. It's sensor or color filter plus software that makes color.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 21:25 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

Foveon is a sensor, and not a lens. You keep repeating the word "Foveon " like an idiot, over and over again, but it doesn't prove the lens create or adds to color. There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries. No such thing exists.

That's because color has nothing to do with lens. It's sensor or color filter plus software that makes color.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 20:34 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

I have looked at raw files for years, and found no proof that lens creates or add to colors. You are claiming there is such proof, you have posted zero evidence for that claim.

You are making a positive assertion, so you must prove it. You can't prove a negative. Take a basic class in logic.

"Again your accurate Foveon summary presents a big problem for Newton's colour theory as understood by official science in the year 2015."

Look at this completely incoherent babbling. The guy is a clown.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 19:34 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

"I'm not claiming to have posted proof, what I said is that raws shot with better lenses prove my point well."

No, they don't. There is no evidence in the raw files that show color quality differences with different lenses. You are a liar.

Coloris byproduct of sensor (or color filter) and software, There is nothing inside a lens that has any kind of property to create or add colors.

Nothing. Nada. Zero.

"And indeed some optical engineers know what to look for, "

You have not posted a single evidence for that claim. You are lying shamelessly again and making up stuff.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries. Nothing of that sort exists.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 18:55 UTC
In reply to:

Cango: Having the RX10MK1 I was looking to upgrade to 4K . Just about pulled the trigger on the RX10MK2 until I read the review on the Panasonic DMC-G7. The G7 with the 14-140 (24-280mm) has 4K, touch screen and fast autofocus. Price is a few bills less than the RX10MK2 .

Also, 14-140 lens is f/3.5-5.6 .. RX10 lens is constant F2.8, so RX10 should probably be better in lowlight, despite the smaller sensor, especially at tele

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 17:03 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

You have not posted any proof, dude. Just claiming there is proof out there even though you don't have it isn't proof.

"I'm not going to tell you the secrets that these engineers use for optically better lense"

LOL. What a moronic idiot. Now he knows the engineering secret sauce in the lens, even though from the quality of his posts he couldn't find his own ass with both hands. But he has proclaimed himself to be an optical engineer now with secret sauce.

But of course he won 't tell us about it.

"The problem with your assertions is that I've used these lenses."

More anecdotal statement proving absolutely nothing.
There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries. Nothing. Nada. Just silly stupid people on the internet.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 16:57 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

"You keep using words like "must", I don't must do anything."

Of course, you won't post proof because there is no proof. It was all hot empty air by an internet troll, like yourself

"Some optical engineers do know about and use this fact,"

Post proof. Post proof. Post proof.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries. Nothing. Nada. Just silly stupid people on the internet.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 07:22 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

No, the one who makes a positive assertion must prove it. You are the one claiming there is secret magic sauce. You provided zero proof. There is no evidence in raw files that shows lenses produce or add to color.

"Some optical engineers do know about this issue"

Post evidence. Post proof.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries. Nothing. Nada. Just silly stupid people on the internet.

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2015 at 20:36 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

There is no evidence in raw files that shows lenses produce or add to color.

There is nothing inside a lens that creates or adds color. If there was, optical engineers would know about it, and would improve it, and there would be new patents and articles and discoveries. Nothing. Nada. Just silly stupid people on the internet.

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2015 at 17:55 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

In other words, you have absolutely zero evidence for your faith.

It's your religious belief that lens creates or adds colors to images, even though Olympus, Fuji, Leica, Schneider, Zeiss, none of these companies say anything like that. Their engineers don't have any secret sauce inside the lense, but it's just your home made faith based on anecdotal evidence that their is a secret sauce that no one, not even these companies engineers, know it.

You are really the dumbest poster posting on these forums.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2015 at 20:42 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

First, of all you have not shown any raws that actually prove your point. You are a liar. And proof has to be valid, not contrast difference or white balance issue that can easily be corrected (I am pretty sure that's what people usually see and imagine their more expensive lens has better colors, even though it's actual scientific/engineering fact that there is nothing inside a lens, absolutely nothing, that creates or adds to color. No where does Olympus and others say they have a secret sauce inside the lens that that has anything to do with color

That's made up by stupid people like you.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2015 at 19:49 UTC
On article BSI Boss? Sony Alpha 7R II added to studio scene (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:
I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.
All good. Very subjective.

"And raws from cameras used with very good lenses prove my point well"

No, that doesn't prove a point. That's anecdotal claim. People claim to see aliens too. I am not interested in anecdotal evidence.

You need to post scientific explanation of your secret sauce that you claim is inside a lens that creates color.

Why has no one in this word has heard of that secret magically sauce that you claim exists? What engineers created that secret sauce if there is no explanation or patent? Nothing? It can't obviously be Canon and Nikon engineers as their sites say nothing about color creating ability of the lens.

You are a dummy. Real dummy.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2015 at 18:34 UTC
Total: 1130, showing: 301 – 320
« First‹ Previous1415161718Next ›Last »