ET2

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 1134, showing: 241 – 260
« First‹ Previous1112131415Next ›Last »
On article And the winners are: DPReview Awards 2015 (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

jimrpdx: 'tis a shame that Pentax' pixel shift and AA simulation were not enough for an innovation nod. The NX1 has some excellent and unique features though.

It's not innovation by Pentax. They simply copied it. Hasselblad was first

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4410648565/hasselblad-unveils-pixel-shifting-200mp-h5d-200c-ms

Then Olympus after that. Third in line was Pentax

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 17:36 UTC
On article And the winners are: DPReview Awards 2015 (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cheng Bao: Doesn't it a little too early to call camera of year 2015?
With photoplus on the way, and many new releases on horizon with 2015?
like 1D x successor?

There is no Photokina this year

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 16:43 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

Albert Silver: "This explains how the a7R II has managed to record the best high-ISO DR that DxO has yet measured."

You mean the SECOND best. The Sony A7s is no.1

Note the article says "the best high-ISO DR" not the best ISO. A7RII has better high ISO DR than A7s

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 03:23 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

You don't have any files. Post it o t else you are making up with the stuff. A7s is better than D4s but you have posting nonsense about that for 2 years with no evidence but made up lies like you did today with a ridiculous claim that Ar7II is whole stop worse than DD810. Here is fact vs fiction

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=sony_a7rii&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=nikon_d810&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=12800&attr16_1=12800&attr16_2=12800&attr16_3=12800&attr171_0=off&attr171_2=off&normalization=print&widget=1&x=-0.10010074857498584&y=-0.9735457037704669

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 01:45 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

You don't have samples. You are lying. My samples got much better performance for A7RII. You have been posting this nonsense for several years now about various A7 and Nikon camera. All pure made up lies.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 00:45 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

If anyone wants to have a good laugh at this clown, who initially claimed D810 is a stop better, an absolutely idiotic claim, just go to this link

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=sony_a7rii&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=nikon_d810&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=12800&attr16_1=12800&attr16_2=12800&attr16_3=12800&attr171_0=off&attr171_2=off&normalization=print&widget=1&x=-0.10010074857498584&y=-0.9735457037704669

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 00:20 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

You are an idiot, dude. A7RII has better high ISO performance by a large margin

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=sony_a7rii&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=nikon_d810&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=12800&attr16_1=12800&attr16_2=12800&attr16_3=12800&attr171_0=off&attr171_2=off&normalization=print&widget=1&x=-0.10010074857498584&y=-0.9735457037704669

It's not even close

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 23:49 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

You are an idiot. I just checked it again for lowlight, and the difference is so huge in A7rII favor that there is no way it can be explained by lens.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=sony_a7rii&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=nikon_d810&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=12800&attr16_1=12800&attr16_2=12800&attr16_3=12800&attr171_0=off&attr171_2=off&normalization=print&widget=1&x=-0.10010074857498584&y=-0.9735457037704669

And you have been promoting completely ridiculous claim that A7RII is worse by 1 top lol. It's not even close.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 22:49 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

A7RII has better noise control than D810 not only according to my samples but on all reliable samples posted everywhere on these two cameras.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 18:18 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

A7RII is clearly better even at ISO 12800

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_a7rii&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=nikon_d810&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=12800&attr16_1=12800&attr16_2=12800&attr16_3=12800&attr171_0=off&attr171_2=off&normalization=print&widget=1&x=0.10987500671608129&y=-1.0885947123328827

Stop better? LOL. You are an idiot.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 18:12 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

Yes I have and my conclusion was that you are an idiot.

Only an an idiot will click on this link and see "look D10 is a stop better" The rest of the world will reach opposite conclusion

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_a7rii&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=sony_a7rii&attr13_3=nikon_d810&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=51200&attr16_1=51200&attr16_2=51200&attr16_3=51200&attr171_0=off&attr171_2=off&normalization=print&widget=1&x=0.10987500671608129&y=-1.0885947123328827

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 18:06 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

No, they don't, not according to me and not according to DPR reviewers.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 18:00 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

You have your experience the rest of the word has their own which contradicts yours, including dxomark, mine and dpr reviewers themselves. A7RII has slight edge over D810 at higher ISOs. That's according to the rest of sane world.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 17:52 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

A7RII has better noise control than D810 not only according to my samples but on all reliable samples posted everywhere on these two cameras.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 16:58 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

joyclick: No sky is going to fall if Sony stopped selling their"best sensors" to Nikon and others.It may turn out to be a blessing in disguise.There is no reason why a sensor far superior to Sony's "best" cannot be and will not be made.
It can and will happen and Sony will be put in its proper place.

Nikon isn't Sony's 1 customer. It's Apple. They made a lot more money in a partnership with Apple than everything else combined.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 16:31 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

cgarrard: Interesting on the actual ISO ratings vs stated ISO ratings by Sony, pretty big drop from what they say it is.

Regardless lots of DR, and a very good performing sensor.

DXO does define it. Read the post again. Dxomark "measured" ISO is based on highlight clipping. That is, two cameras clip highlights at that "measured" ISO.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 16:18 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

If one sensor has higher resolution (in this case it is, A7RII 42 MP vs 36 MP) downsampling them to equal size would be the correct way to compare images.

D810 is noisier than A7RII .

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 16:16 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

Yes, it does, and these studio shots are clear. A7RII does better than D810

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 06:24 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: D810 sure wins for noise control when doing the ISO invariance thing.

HowaboutRAW , click on print to see equal size. It's pretty clear A7RII is better than D810

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 05:12 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2168 comments in total)
In reply to:

cgarrard: Interesting on the actual ISO ratings vs stated ISO ratings by Sony, pretty big drop from what they say it is.

Regardless lots of DR, and a very good performing sensor.

DXO ISO is NOT a standard of anything. It's only used to compare sensors. Learn something here

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/50892647

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 05:10 UTC
Total: 1134, showing: 241 – 260
« First‹ Previous1112131415Next ›Last »