jjz2

I think most people using the iphone for on the go photography with followings are using alternative apps. Stuff like VSCO has been pretty popular for over 5 years now, even if the tech wasn't ...

Not sure they are comparable, a smart phone, like a computer is almost necessary for functioning in modern life and jobs, where I can't say the same for cameras. I.E. you have it anyway.

Yes the video on current iPhones is much better than the first few x 100s...I’m not sure about the f. Low light photography esp black and white still the realm of better cameras. Of course most ppl ...

Yes looking at the 18 I’d probably get that since it’s almost as small as the 27 but has the aperture ring, paired with the 35 mm 1.4 for ppl photos. Similar to the popular 28mm 50mm Leica combo ...

You can definitely pull it off. I shot a 50mm in several crop dslrs. However I always found myself wanting longer. I really like 85/105 for lenses for this. Just preference I guess. I find the 135 ...

Yes that might be a better solution and compromise between the two. That’s amazing even between d800. I was only a more lowly canon with just 20mp.

I have strongly looked at the xe 2 or xt1 instead. I guess I’m habing sellers remorse from not having a dslr also anymore also to really create images with the other lenses. I guess with that you ...

Old post but most relevant without creating a new thread. So would you say if you aren’t going to post process the files and just use jpeg that the x100 system isn’t really worth it vs an iPhone? ...

Not sure I agree on the big cities thing. I actually find it easier to be anonymous in big cities.

Yeah photography for me is more capturing my own memories for review later or creating something cool, not necessarily to share it. I might send a text of one to somebody like my wife or good...

Would like to see more of this study...

I take more than one photo a day, but maybe post one a month or less...

I just don't feel compelled to share as I don't find enough of them interesting,...

It's too late... and yes what you said is true. For me personally, I NEVER really wanted a DSLR, it was just the only affordable option to get good digital photos for about 10 years there. I tried ...

Yes it all really depends on the type of travel you do. 90% of my travel is in cities walking around, so, having a tiny discreet cam for carrying all day is ideal. Esp if you are covering 10+ ...

X100s and iPhone 7 only plus a knock-off gorilla pod sometimes. I really don't like carrying gear and sold all of it. This does the job for me and makes me more creative...and, I actually bring ...

Yes, and for street photography, it can make you seem too distant like you were conducting espionage or shooting wildlife.

This, I got to the point where I NEVER brought my dslr out. Even APS-C DSLR's are too big, all of them, at least for me. The last straw was a 2015 trip to london, dublin and paris, I had my dslr ...

The 85 1.4 on FF will have shallower DOF, but what's more important for a good photo and that POP is that the subject is SHARP and the background is nice. Difference in an APS-C crop will catch ...

I use the 35 1.4 and 60 2.4. If I was more serious and had the money I'd use the 56 and 90, no question, just based on galleries and raw specs of those lenses. The 56 is equiv to a Full frame 85 ...

Well not many of us can stick with one lens...general purpose is vague. I like pretty much everything in the 16-200 equivalent range. I also like primes. I would just stop worrying about it, ...

Depends how you shoot really, 7d is a great camera IQ wise but technology wise it is in the past. For me, it's 2018 and "I just can't" without WiFi in a camera. I often want to just share a few ...