RadPhoto

Lives in United States NY, United States
Joined on Dec 25, 2011

Comments

Total: 202, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony a7R Mark III review (433 comments in total)
In reply to:

NickyB66: Another blow for canon and Nikon.

@NickyB66

How is this a blow to Nikon? Do you really think a photographer would pick a Sony camera over Nikon's because DPR said it's "90" and Nikon "89"?

I am sure more than 1 point went to Sony because of video features. Most of photographers don't care about that including myself.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2017 at 03:36 UTC
On article Sony a7R Mark III review (433 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: The real question is this is really expensive and if one is not super rich
is this worth the updated from A7R II

I would say no, wait for a jump in resolution is what I will do
60MP is coming, Sony is just waiting for Canon/Nikon

This is a intermediate product and not worth the steep price

@RubberDials

But maybe you have to buy a Zeiss lens with it.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2017 at 03:31 UTC
On article Sony a7R Mark III review (433 comments in total)

Forgot to mention that it's
"Not so good for" Astrophotography because it eats stars!

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2017 at 03:28 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

Ebrahim Saadawi: Would a large chip RX100 been better in all aspects of IQ and usability and output? An LX100? A BMPCC? A G85? GH4? even a S35 1080p D3400/M100? I most believe definitely yes.

But then again would it be on DPReview? Would I've seen it? no. So it works. Marketing and it works.

@Ebrahim Saadawi
Hmmmm. You claim you're 22 years old, A "respected dentist", filmmaker, hobbyest photographer. All of that and you're only 22?!

I think I going to believe @Nindy. Something fishy and doesn't seem right!

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2017 at 05:26 UTC
In reply to:

Ebrahim Saadawi: Would a large chip RX100 been better in all aspects of IQ and usability and output? An LX100? A BMPCC? A G85? GH4? even a S35 1080p D3400/M100? I most believe definitely yes.

But then again would it be on DPReview? Would I've seen it? no. So it works. Marketing and it works.

Do you think Apple PAID for this?

Marketing by which company? DPreview, the chef, The photographer/videographer?

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2017 at 06:52 UTC
In reply to:

zubs: Apple promo

@AngularJS
"...Crappy face unlock ..."

I got the iPhone X. And the face unlock is the BEST new feature. It's so natural. More than the finger print.

I am sure you hate it until your fave brand copies it and then all of the a sudden you like it and not crappy anymore!

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2017 at 06:46 UTC
In reply to:

KeepCalm: When I was married the whole think hinged around the marriage vows which were a one time promise and the venue was of minor importance. With these spectacular new modern marriages the underlying point seems to be rather lost in all this peripheral posturing and complexity.

@Banhmi
Is the couple still married?

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2017 at 06:27 UTC
On article These are the best smartphone cameras you can buy now (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dante Birchen: I am missing the best for stills category.

@teddoman
Not according to DXO.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2017 at 06:25 UTC
On article These are the best smartphone cameras you can buy now (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

vegasdood: After owning the Note 3 and Note 5 and returning the Note 8, I am very satisfied with the LG V30 in the two weeks I have had it. Not a phone to impress the hot chick sitting across from you at lunch, but, for a daily driver it really gets the job done.

@MdNvS Not sure if you're trolling but anyway...
You seem you never used an iPhone iOS so I am not going to my waste time on educating you. Youtube is a good option to start with.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2017 at 22:36 UTC
On article These are the best smartphone cameras you can buy now (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

riknash: Holy crap, Amazon says it costs $2400 CAD to purchase iPnone X! A product that has a depreciation of 50% in one year, no thanks.

@Gerard Hoffnung
And I have a friend how bought it for that amount in Calgary. Not sure why people like @riknash say it's CAD$2400. Maybe that one comes with a Gold cover!

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2017 at 22:31 UTC
On article These are the best smartphone cameras you can buy now (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

riknash: Holy crap, Amazon says it costs $2400 CAD to purchase iPnone X! A product that has a depreciation of 50% in one year, no thanks.

I thought it’s $1300 in Canada!
Which is almost equivalent when one converts from $USD

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2017 at 18:11 UTC
On article These are the best smartphone cameras you can buy now (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

vegasdood: After owning the Note 3 and Note 5 and returning the Note 8, I am very satisfied with the LG V30 in the two weeks I have had it. Not a phone to impress the hot chick sitting across from you at lunch, but, for a daily driver it really gets the job done.

What can you AND want to customize on Android but can’t on iOS? I am really curious!

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2017 at 16:01 UTC
On article These are the best smartphone cameras you can buy now (133 comments in total)

So, pretty much we should buy ALL phones.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2017 at 15:56 UTC as 35th comment | 1 reply
On article These are the best smartphone cameras you can buy now (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

princecody: Best Overall camera in smartphone award goes to 🤔

iPhone X.
I think they didn’t want to mention it because anti-Apple peeps will attack.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2017 at 15:54 UTC

Most of commenters here should stick to their wedding photography!

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2017 at 03:44 UTC as 37th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

ttran88: All that weight is just wasting a whole lot of expensive rocket fuel.

Yeah, I am sure you're smarter than NASA's scientists and engineers! You should call them!

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2017 at 03:38 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1395 comments in total)

"Not only is the battery capacity increased by 37% (and CIPA rating has jumped from 350 to 440 shots from the E-M1 to the E-M1 II), but the new charger will recharge the battery in 50% less time as well."

Sony? Are you listening?

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 15:50 UTC as 310th comment | 3 replies
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

expoboy52: Can anyone confirm a built-in flash on the D500? It says 'no' on the specs listed here but the Nikon USA website says 'yes'.

Sorry. I meant
There is NO built-in flash for sure. Check Youtube previews

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 04:55 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

expoboy52: Can anyone confirm a built-in flash on the D500? It says 'no' on the specs listed here but the Nikon USA website says 'yes'.

There is built-in flash for sure. Check Youtube previews

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 04:32 UTC
On article Field Test: Brad Puet and the Fujifilm X-T10 (120 comments in total)

Excellent

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2015 at 10:26 UTC as 55th comment
Total: 202, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »