TO11MTM

MEH... Even a good extender has it's limitations. I got arguably better results with an MFT+45-200 lens than my A6000+55-200+HG1758, although it really depended on use. It doesn't help that my ...

As far as having it as an option... If I had to guess, the market isn't large enough to warrant the feature with the DIY solutions out there. Maybe Sony could/should do it as an app? As for Silent ...

@NikonCanonFan I laughed, thank you for that.

I'll say this: anyone who runs one of these as their primary probably has more money than common sense, is super artsy, or some sort of hipster I'd...

This post made me realize that paying Sony Tax is Easy mode. I was feeling like 230-300 for an EVF was crappy, Leica has outdone them in cost and 'features'.

I'm guessing MS support only adds a dollar, if that to the cost of the camera. It's Sony tech so licensing is a non-cost, so they're only paying for the connector and throwing a bone to the few...

I personally wouldn't suggest the F3 with at 55-210 for sports. The focus speed is pretty poor with that combination in my experience. The 18-105 focuses better than I would expect on the long end ...

The APS-C Cameras are very more targeted towards consumers than their full-frame. Consumers love bigger numbers. This is part of why the A7 and A7ii have the same MP rating as their APS-C Cameras. ...

Lens profiles will typically fix the problem. I'll note that on my A6000, I found that RAWs corrected in DXO looked 'better' than OOC JPEGs. The JPEG images looked 'overcorrected' at certain focal ...

One point worth noting; certain other functions will still be unavailable while clearing the buffer (it's been too long since I've shot, but playback comes to mind,) at least I see this behavior ...

Integration and miniaturization costs money. As does the increasing non-standardization of parts across said mainboards. It's not like the old days where the majority of cameras across a line ...

Alongside all the other comments... the SEL50F18 and (to a lesser extent) the SEL35F18 will give some good 'pop'. The 50 more so (especially due to the focal length) but the 35 should give decent ...

Okay, I LOLed reading this. I'm very much a Sony shooter, but Nikon has a lot of 'legacy' shooters. They do have pretty dang good AF technology, and that will allow them to have a future for quite ...

Here's my take on in camera correction for the 18-105. I have used mine on an NEX-F3, 5R, and a6000. Until some of the firmware updates released in the last year and a half or so, the a6000's in ...

I wouldn't say Total crap. You have to know how to interpret the results based on the use of a given lens as well as what your specific case requires. One thing that affects the DXO Test score is ...

No need to get all fancy with comparison shots; the specs are actually really handy for answering this one. According to Sony's website, the Magnification Ratio for the 35 1.8 is 0.15x. The 50 1.8 ...

Er... No. Zoom lenses Historically have had (and will have for the foreseeable future) lower quality than a Prime lens at the same length. It's not 'just' the Aperture. A Zoom lens is designed to ...

I'm curious as to the price. If the 70-300 G is any indication, I'm guessing it will be at least 1500$. I'm guessing the quality would be better than the Sigma, but as a hobbyist shooting APS-C, ...

My guess would be the fact that video can be done with (in theory) as little as 10% the amount of reading from the sensor (2MP for 1920x1080 vs 24MP full resolution). In practice they use more ...

Would you sell the EVF Alone?

The 18-105 is indeed a sharper lens, and while others have pointed out most of the drawbacks present with it, it may be worth considering a Prime for your work. I noticed your sample image was shot ...