Mescalamba

Why not?

Money usually.

Based on his ears, someone loved him a lot.. and tried to eat him. :D

Cute tho..

In color case, 8bit isnt problem. In BW case, 256 steps actually is a problem. And yes, you can see it.

In general, doing BW prints is rather difficult. I would very much like camera that could do...

It does not.

Internet really is good in killing society (and its today anti-social actually). But its just a tool as many others, that only propel humanity to do what they do best. Which is...

Its bigger than average, sadly not enough.

58x58 would be nicer.

Internet is definitely good in killing society. Crazy politicians even better..

In the essence, nothing really changes when it comes to humanity.

Difference aint that huge, unless camera can actually resolve 14+ bits. Which while many claim to have "14 bit raws" still very few actually fill those bits.

Well, he more or less gave us visual side of everything that uses displays today.

That guy was Nobel prize material..

Well, we can raytrace dots now in real time. Not bad either.

It was about hardware. If you ever saw early digital cameras you understand how uncomfortable it was compared to same day analogs. Not mentioning sensor/film size.

Cause they do that, its that simple. I wouldnt do that if they werent such greedy a holes.

"designed obsolence is already illegal and restricted by law"

Fairly sure Apple never heard about this one. :D

It does exist and its most likely same as in Nikon counterparts.

Nikon definitely doesnt use same CFA as Sony, despite using their sensor. Given numbers for Nikon and Pentax are rather close to...

@dpthoughts

Color accuracy of CFA isnt tied to color profile, its independent metric. Color profiles just shift colors around, they cant provide extra color clarity. Either CFA does its job or it...

I would perfer performance that can be measured.

Mostly something about 14 or more bit RAW files preferably with as accurate colors as possible. Cause last time I checked (and only reason I dont...

For this type of shots FF isnt that big advantage. Crop is actually kinda welcomed if you need to be really far. And if you shoot 300+ lens with f2.8 you actually want more DoF, not less.

This is...

Very good question.

IMHO, H.265 is good for me only cause I can use GPU to recode stuff. Otherwise that so called "similar quality" and lower size is actually not so real. Its a bit smaller and...

Hybrid, StaxRip to add two more. Not super user friendly, but can do pretty good job. And support GPUs to do most of the job.

Both free ofc.

Yea it has some diminishing returns.

Unless you have GPU with h.265, then you can compress 30 min video in about 2 minutes (depends on settings, more advanced stuff is slower a bit). Only...

Only for future. It would need to be really close to h.265. But chances are it will be possible to accelerate it via GPU anyway, just without instructions built-in (thus not that fast).