Just Ed

Just Ed

Lives in United States CA, United States
Joined on Nov 5, 2011

Comments

Total: 383, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (802 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cultured Vulture: This camera has a real chance to be a dream camera for landscape, architecture and studio photographers. That is if they support it with a lens set to match. Finally a digital MF that won't weigh you down. It's also the first mirrorless that interests me.

Yes and they really need a decent wide angle lens to round out the package.

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2016 at 14:15 UTC
In reply to:

Thanatham Piriyakarnjanakul: More light loss, bigger, added weight and need to increase ISO or change shutter speed when use teleconverter that very great idea. face palm.

OP...Good grief, get a real life!

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 18:56 UTC
In reply to:

Alex Efimoff: It's very generous of Hasselblad.

.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2016 at 21:29 UTC
In reply to:

ELLIOTPAULSTERN: I am not sure I get this. Digital cameras on drones have been doing this for quite some time with some very high quality images.

Is this all students at Rochester have to do?

Elliotpaulstern, I'm with you. What's worse is that DP bothered to show those blurry images.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2016 at 13:42 UTC
In reply to:

Howard: Now both of these and TIME magazine can happily go into history's dust bin.

Howard, indeed technology has moved on. Pulp magazines are outdated as well. This was a trip down nostalga lane which glosses over the horrible pictures either of these cameras yielded. I am glad technology moved on, would not want either of these cameras.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 14:42 UTC
In reply to:

Just Ed: Sounds good to me. The iPhone should be #3 imo.

^Troll! DPR has so many of them.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 14:34 UTC

Sounds good to me. The iPhone should be #3 imo.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 00:07 UTC as 32nd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

PhotoKhan: Disaster!

How will all Canon pros switch brands before Rio's Opening Ceremony, on the 5th of August? There's simply no time!

How will they be able to push 5EV on Bolt and Gatlin?

It's worse than ZIca!

(...good grief...splitting hairs on such behemoths, technical marvel cameras...You guys and DPR really lost it...)

Indeed, it seems to beat the D5 soundly

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 15:00 UTC
On article Taking it easy: Canon EOS 80D shooting experience (294 comments in total)
In reply to:

Just Ed: Would like to see how the controls are laid out on the back of the camera, did I miss something? Not interested in this crop sensor but am wondering if the body will be the starting point for the 6D mkii....whenever that appears?

Possibly not, there are rummors that Canon wants it smaller. But of course no one really knows yet.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 20:38 UTC
On article Taking it easy: Canon EOS 80D shooting experience (294 comments in total)

Would like to see how the controls are laid out on the back of the camera, did I miss something? Not interested in this crop sensor but am wondering if the body will be the starting point for the 6D mkii....whenever that appears?

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 20:01 UTC as 59th comment | 2 replies
On article CP+ 2016: Things we found that had been cut in half (135 comments in total)

I had no idea cameras were made in halves? Am going to inspect mine with a magnifier to see if I can find the seams.😀

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2016 at 15:53 UTC as 25th comment

Sigma's Quatro cameras might get more traction in the market place if their body design wasn't so odd. jmo😀

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 15:21 UTC as 47th comment
In reply to:

Fogsprig: Every comment section on DPR leaves me with a notion that Sony guys are the worst amongst fanboys.

Reminds me of the old Sony and Cher "Sony, no baloney" comercials.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 15:13 UTC
On article Picasa will be phased out in favor of Google Photos (151 comments in total)
In reply to:

shutterbobby: Wonder if Picasa will still work? or will they kill the web albums as well :(

Nimbifer, you answered my question....that makes me very depressed as I have some public albums.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2016 at 17:46 UTC
On article Picasa will be phased out in favor of Google Photos (151 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reactive: This seems a sort-of logical step, as Picasa was a fully fledged app from many years ago. Now Google will be able to do what they do with all their other apps, which means remove most of the useful features, add silly new features that you don't need, and generally spoil the interface a little bit more on every update.

Yup, just like Apple did with iPhoto

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2016 at 17:43 UTC
In reply to:

Wild Light: hyperbole

Let me clarify it for you: Please buy one of our lenses so I can keep my job.😀

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 15:19 UTC
In reply to:

princecody: Sony is WINNING!

May you mature into a well rounded person.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 15:18 UTC
In reply to:

rsenk19: It is difficult to trust the word "forever" from companies like Sony...

You Are more diplomatic than I am.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 15:17 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (617 comments in total)

http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2016/02/01/its-here-my-thoughts-on-the-new-canon-1dx-mkii/

A brief but interesting hands on. The video is quite nice given the size on my iPad.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 16:56 UTC as 29th comment
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (617 comments in total)
In reply to:

Robemo: Well, can't blame DPReview for two articles about this new camera in a very 'neutral' and fact based way. In stark contrast to the almost 'hyperventilating' articles full of subjective superlatives that DPReview published when other cameras were introduced recently before decent tests were done.
I like the 'neutral' way better. But I do wonder why even our techie Rishi fails to mention one particular fact about this camera that is rather significant for Canon users (or any photographer). It's the fact that Canon finally integrated the A/D converter circuitry with the sensor like Sony has been doing for some time. Any reason? Because this is where hundreds if not thousands flame wars were about in the forums. And it was the standard critical remark in all reviews of Canon cameras here. So why omit it when it's so important?

Rishi, for some reason Canon is downplaying the on chip DA and have releasd no technical details about it. They have made a statement that at native iso there should be improbed DR. Not that matters much as this is clearly not a landscape photographers best choice. However, it does make me wonder what Canon doing by not trumpeting the new chip features equally?

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 15:35 UTC
Total: 383, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »