sankos

I haven't used other Chrome-based browsers but the current Edge (83.0.478.58) seems to properly take into account my wide-gamut monitor profile when using YouTube, whereas Internet Explorer ...

OK, so Firefox 78.0.1 is out and the colour management issue has been fixed -- graphic elements look the same now as in the new MS Edge. However, YT videos are still oversaturated in Fx when ...

In the meantime, the new Chromium-based Edge appears to be colour-managed now, as opposed to the previous versions (and Internet Explorer). It reads the embedded tags and profiles, also respecting ...

Yes, the plug-in support in AP 1.8 is finally quite good -- I'm talking about the colour-management problems that seem to have finally been addressed. The only problematic plug-in is Viveza (I use ...

Nice workaround. Thanks for sharing.

If you use Lr, I'd export a full-sized tiff from PhotoLab and resize/sharpen in Lr. I either do that or resize/output sharpen in Affinity or XnViewMP -- they support Lanczos resizing, which i find ...

Thanks for the heads-up, Pat. Aurelien Pierre has been such a great asset to the open source community in the recent years, not only as a developer, but also as an educator. He can get a bit ...

I use Geosetter, but it doesn't modify the raw file; instead it creates a sidecar xmp file alongside your raw file, which should be picked up by your raw converter (Lr, C1, DxO or darktable ...

While Windows Photos (the app you show in your screenshot) doesn't respect your monitor profile no matter what you do, Windows Photo Viewer should be able to use it (but it doesn't like LUT+matrix ...

Doing the tonal balancing with you raw file has a number of advantages over the classic luminosity (luminance) masking approach a la Tony Kuyper, Sean Bagshaw, Greg Benz, Jimmy McIntyre and ...

Should Ricoh/Pentax keep doing whatever they're doing? What sayst thou?

What's important for me is the preview-adjacent area (the margins), not the program interface itself. I set my margins to 50% grey in all my raw converters, editors and image viewers, but some ...

I might try Vivaldi, thanks. But for now Edge works well for me for uploading from PC, and I just have to press F12 to get access to Instagram buttons.

I thought about the emulation mode (Ctrl-Shift-M on Firefox) as the culprit, but I know of no other way of making posts on Instagram using PC web browsers. It seems like IG cripple the non-mobile ...

OK, so this time I uploaded an sRGB jpeg with a web browser which doesn't respect my wide gamut monitor profile (Microsoft Edge, Win10/1909). Here's the file: original to be uploaded to IG via Edge ...

I uninstalled Topaz Studio 2 after trying to use it for a couple of months. I kept counting on the updates to resolve my soft images issue, but none of the heavy updates (costing me several GB of ...

I agree. Yes, I use Firefox and it's set to colour-manage all the elements. But I save the photo to disc and view it in other colour-managed software, where the same thing happens. It's embedded in ...

Thanks, I'll try the PNG route then. [edited to add] OK, I get the same when I upload a PNG with their c2.ICC profile. I suspect this might be because I try to upload to Instagram via web browser ...

When you upload an sRGB jpg to Instagram following their instructions (1080px on short side), the photo is converted to their in-house ICC profile called c2 (made with Little CMS). I extracted it ...

I suspect a new RT version is round the corner so possibly it'll have support of 90D. In RT you can use Adobe DCP profiles so that you get the same colours as in Lr (but disable the Auto-matched ...