XerxesOG

Waiting for the PSA: "Apple warns screen may break or scratch at the slightest impact". That would be what an honest company would say.

What else does it do?
Play games.
Run office software.
Check Mail.
Text.
Watch Youtube.

The word is you must use 2nd grade math to figure it out. 300 MB/s with image size of around 30/40 MB with X buffer size at a rate of 30 images per second... Its math so you can figure it out if...

Of course they're going to get better, and at some point one has to think that image quality will stop being the defining difference between the two. I'm sure the digital effects will evolve as...

Why do Owls, cats, etc all have large eyes for gathering light in the dark? You don't gather more light with a smaller lens, that's an unavoidable reality. Something has to physically be there to...

Who is railing against it? The software effect is impressive for sure. Wow, astonishing work by Apple. If you ask me Apple has to be thinking they're going to make a real camera soon... they've...

Makes sense! What doesn't make sense is building such a high end phone and selling a 128GB version of it.

That is exactly what Canon/Sony would want. The opportunity to go mano y mano with real competitor rather than playing games with each other. Of course, Apple HAD a lot of money but they gave it...

It is a very nice phone. Great features, expensive but great phone.

Amazing phone, we can only sit here and marvel at what Tim Apple created. Great job Tim Apple.

Ultimately there are limitations in how much actual resolution can be drawn from a sensor without resorting to some very high end technology. At some point the smaller pixels will cause the sensor...

Speaking of resolution of large prints, I always like to think about store displays! They've been doing huge larger than life prints of people for decades now and I've never once thought that one...

More megapixels is not always more resolution. Higher resolution sensors have their own pitfalls, most of the current ones read out more slowly and have much more noise than the R3 has. Guarantee...

Just like perfection. Needs no correction. Like no other. Absolutely, flawless.

Honestly, I doubt Canon wants to sell a ton of R3's. They're probably hoping to get a lot of "waiters" who skip this and buy the R1.

Megapixels is the most misunderstood as well which is the conundrum. Most people equate resolution to megapixels when it is anything but the case. Few understand how narrow depth of field becomes...

No. Amazing technology and great implementation. But it won't work. First of all, these kinds of shots are mostly a gimmick and are best reserved for those oooh big LOL there buddy type of...

Realistically speaking it's true that for a well framed shot with proper aperture and lighting 24MP is going to work for a lot of print sizes. If you stick with the idea that everything has to be...

There are cheaper ways to get “character” in your lenses.

I’ll wait. If this is the best they can come up with they’ll never beat PC’s. PC’s are working with ancient layouts that are basically unchanged for 20 years… If it ever occurs to AMD and Intel to...