Mr R Adams

Yes, field of view changes but light density remains constant. An F4 lens continues to be an F4 lens whatever you put it on. An F4 lens does not become an F8 lens because you screw it onto a small...

If you take a 50mm F1.8 lens off a full frame and mount it to a crop, the aperture will pass the same amount of light by area (why wouldn't it). If you dial in an exposure of 1/100th of a second,...

Equivalence only relates to depth-of-field - which can be important (of course) but in terms of exposure, the F4 will shoot at faster shooter speeds and the camera's AF has a much brighter aperture...

If this sort of thing appeals - an MFT 300mm F4 pro might be a better fit. Sure, in depth of field its blur is equivalent to F8 on FF, but in terms of light density and exposure times - its a true...

Hey, thanks for the review. Please don’t let the D6 distract you from the Oly M1 mk3 review. I’m looking forward to that one. :)

Too right it is

Attractive looking camera. Should sell a few on that basis alone.

Depends if you want depth of field in which case the full frame camera must use smaller, dimmer apertures than MFT bringing parity to both. If shooting at bright apertures, FF has the potential...

Indeed. You can switch to high res mode on the studio scene.

I could write the same thing about my 50mm.

I think image quality can improve content. For example, DVD eliminated the flawed images of VHS enabling us to see something much closer to what we saw in the cinema and in real life. 4K adds...

I never bought into 4k. VHS to DVD was sensational, DVD to BD was good, BD to 4k BD is good for looking at skin pores if you get to within 2 feet of the screen. Yeah, it's better but not in the...

Hi, 24 megapixel files at 33%. Look awful on C1 20 compared to C1 12 and others.

Strangest issue for me is how bad images looked when viewed at 33% and smaller. Of course, you can zoom in and get better detail but holistic changes like tone curves are more difficult than c1 12...

It's worth remembering aperture size is relative to focal length. F11 at 1000 mm actual is still a physically quite large gap for light to pass unobstructed

Is it just me or Olympus making some of the most exciting gear at the moment. Handheld photography at 2000mm. Serweet

Yep, you would get sharper results with a genuine 2000mm f11. Except, you wouldn’t be able to carry it

It might actually be 5.6 at 85mm. I guess we will see

Fantastic, not everyone wants or needs heavy HiFi glass..

Ah yes, split prism. Those were the days. I do wonder whether it would be adequate for the resolutions we're seeing these days. I think the trade offs between DSLRS and mirrorless will deminish and...