steelski

Lives in Bulgaria Bulgaria
Works as a Photographer
Joined on Jun 19, 2006

Comments

Total: 80, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Huawei's Honor Note 8 comes with 6.6" Quad-HD screen (54 comments in total)

Big phone.
http://www.iainclaridge.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/0110/i_am_on_the_phone.jpg

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2016 at 11:24 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

Kamox: Note to the Dpreview editors: you should definitely produce a comparison video for über-geeks featuring:
- this lens;
- the Zeiss 1700/4 (you might have to fly to Qatar);
- the Sigma 200-500/2.8;
- the Canon 1200/5.6;
- the Nikon 1200-1700/5.6-8.
If you can find those lenses, that is.

Pentax 800mm F4

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2016 at 19:32 UTC
On article Pentax K-1 Pixel Shift: An update (96 comments in total)

Thank you for this. Its much appreciated.
You might want to also consider the F16 setting used. Although its common in landscapes, its really hitting the defraction limit on a standard 2.8 Zoom.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 19:05 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zoran K: Unfortunately, digital artefacts are noticeable when Pixel Shift Resolution with Motion Correction is turned on.

Its an ACR/Lightroom/Adobe Issue

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 20:13 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

steelski: Please oh please try the files in the Pentax software, Update it first to the latest version.
As others have said, The Camera Store tested it and it coped better.

Rishi, Try the Pentax software. Maybe in SilkyPix software it does not work, But not in the Pentax provided software!!!
There is a massive difference with and without Motion correction!!!

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 20:11 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

steelski: Please oh please try the files in the Pentax software, Update it first to the latest version.
As others have said, The Camera Store tested it and it coped better.

Here is an extract from the DXOMark Lens comparison of the Tamron equivalent lens.
"A sharpness score of 17 P-Mpix is impressive in terms of the direct competition again ranking 1st for pro standard zooms, ahead of the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED with 15 P-Mpix, and the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 IF EX DG HSM with 16 P-Mpix.
Considering the huge 36-megapixel sensor in the D800 however a sharpness score of 17 P-Mpix is less than half of the camera’s resolution and put into that perspective is less impressive. So whilst the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD – and pro standard zooms in general – offer good features, build and versatility, lenses that cover such a focal range with a large fixed maximum aperture aren’t the sharpest. "
Moral of the story,
The lens MP combo is not going to show off Pixel Shift. We are really getting into the limits of lenses here IMO.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 19:56 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

steelski: Please oh please try the files in the Pentax software, Update it first to the latest version.
As others have said, The Camera Store tested it and it coped better.

I just tried all the picture with the worst artifacts. It actually works in the Pentax software. But also, I think its masked by defraction at F16!,
I would imagine a much better showing at F5.6 - F8, which would not have suited the waterfall. Photozone tested the Tamron lens and it showed falloff at F11 on a Canon 21MP camera,
Now imagine the effect on something with over twice the resolution, (when you take pixel shift into account).

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 19:50 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

steelski: Please oh please try the files in the Pentax software, Update it first to the latest version.
As others have said, The Camera Store tested it and it coped better.

I lightbulb went on in my head, I just tested it and low and behold, its very different!.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 19:30 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)

Please oh please try the files in the Pentax software, Update it first to the latest version.
As others have said, The Camera Store tested it and it coped better.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 19:18 UTC as 98th comment | 10 replies
In reply to:

Lloyd709: I bet all those stuck in the mud staying with CS6 are starting to feel just a little bit jealous now!!!! Anyone guess what waterfall that is?

well, its pretty good for a first attempt.
Am I kidding?

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 22:47 UTC
In reply to:

Lloyd709: I bet all those stuck in the mud staying with CS6 are starting to feel just a little bit jealous now!!!! Anyone guess what waterfall that is?

no, you do know that this is already doable in CS6 right?
you just have to do it individually for each corner

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 20:31 UTC
In reply to:

Ian Leach: So we are comparing a designed in 1999 diminutive 77mm ltd lens against the hunk of glass which is the Nikkor 85mm 1.4G.

It is a golden limited lens! but thats because of its character, it has never really tested great in terms of off centre sharpness and chromatic aberration. Its mediocre at best!!! but it makes a great looking image IMO.

Link | Posted on May 6, 2016 at 10:44 UTC
In reply to:

NeilJones: Complete overkill.
Sony a7r ii can achieve similar results at a fraction of price.
With most images being web based now, who needs a 100mp!
So silly.

There's always one.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2016 at 17:06 UTC
On article DPReview recommends: Best Cameras for Kids 2015 (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pandimonium: How 'bout dads old dslr ;)

how about dads old SLR and craptastic 50mm F2 lens.
Teach those SOBs to focus on something in life :P.

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2015 at 17:06 UTC
On article Recipe for 6S: iPhone 6S Real-world Sample Gallery (122 comments in total)
In reply to:

srados: Still my 2 year old Note 4 does 10x better job.

you guys are dumb.... As its a note 4, it will be 4 times better.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2015 at 22:27 UTC

all over 200 dollars........ are you kidding me.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 13:23 UTC as 25th comment | 1 reply
On article Heavy lifting: Leica S (Type 007) sample gallery (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

moontide: Beautiful image rendition, but I think at this price there shouldn't be banding at ISO 12500.

I meant the Leica, Its riddles with banding at high ISO. the Pentax does not exhibit this, dispute whet you may say. you need to show the Pentax banding.

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2015 at 19:56 UTC
On article Heavy lifting: Leica S (Type 007) sample gallery (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

moontide: Beautiful image rendition, but I think at this price there shouldn't be banding at ISO 12500.

HowaboutRAW..... You need to look again,

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2015 at 19:05 UTC
On article Heavy lifting: Leica S (Type 007) sample gallery (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

moontide: Beautiful image rendition, but I think at this price there shouldn't be banding at ISO 12500.

Buuut the pentax 645D does not have banding. and the glass is pretty great.

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2015 at 18:34 UTC
On article Pentax K-3 II added to studio test scene comparison (177 comments in total)

edit out,

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2015 at 04:10 UTC as 8th comment
Total: 80, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »