jkrumm

Lives in United States Duluth, MN, United States
Works as a teacher
Joined on Oct 13, 2007

Comments

Total: 279, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article UPDATED: Sony a6300 real-world samples (354 comments in total)

I like the water fountain shot in the hallway. Most of the outdoor action shots have a soft, "not quite" look to them. Almost appears to be shutter shock, but could also just be that focus did not catch, or the shutter was not fast enough, or lens IS did something weird....

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 00:18 UTC as 95th comment | 1 reply
On article Quick review: Nextbit Robin camera (44 comments in total)

I guess it's one of those inevitable ideas. Seems like a service that could go out of business too.

The camera looks not bad for a smartphone.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 21:34 UTC as 23rd comment
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)
In reply to:

Couscousdelight: Full res image with pixel shift activated.
Gorgeous..

Pixel shift activated :
http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/k-1/ex/img/ex-pic05_on.jpg

Without pixel shift :
http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/k-1/ex/img/ex-pic05_off.jpg

That really seems to help the greens. Love the look.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 17:10 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)
In reply to:

jkrumm: Barney, maybe you know the answer to this question. Does the K mount Sigma 35 Art lens cover the full frame?

If that's the case then Sigma still makes nine K mount DG lenses that will work on the K1, but the 35 1.4 is the only newish one. Good to know if considering the camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 16:04 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)

Barney, maybe you know the answer to this question. Does the K mount Sigma 35 Art lens cover the full frame?

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 14:47 UTC as 129th comment | 3 replies
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2660 comments in total)

I'm mostly curious how the Sigma Art lenses work with this. I know the 35 1.4 comes in K mount. Have not heard about some of the newer ones, like the 24-35 f2.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 13:32 UTC as 510th comment
On article Nifty fifty: Hands-on with the Hasselblad H5D-50c Wi-Fi (123 comments in total)

This post makes me wonder why DPR doesn't have a medium format forum. Would be a fun place for some of us to ooh and aah over images, at least.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2016 at 14:31 UTC as 15th comment
On article Nifty fifty: Hands-on with the Hasselblad H5D-50c Wi-Fi (123 comments in total)
In reply to:

J A C S: Pretty bland for 50mp MF. The castle shot is a bit lacking in detail, sharpened or not. The horse shot is fine, not counting the blown highlights.

#10 has very pleasant colors.

Look at the cable running up the side of the castle. Any more detail would be molecular.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2016 at 13:05 UTC
On article Nifty fifty: Hands-on with the Hasselblad H5D-50c Wi-Fi (123 comments in total)

The overall look of the images is pretty awesome. Looks like a "fine art" machine.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 19:20 UTC as 38th comment
In reply to:

piratejabez: I love how there's more backlash here about seeing "Oh, wow!" in the title than there is actual discussion of the camera... That's what I get for reading the comments section :)

Since there is no exclamation point, you can even interpret it as sarcasm. Oh wow

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 18:04 UTC
In reply to:

Tim Skrastins: Can someone explain to me why there is shutter blackout to begin with? This is a mirrorless camera right? What is blacking out the electronic view? When I pull the lens off, there is just a sensor there...no shutter, no mirror.

(PS - I have an A6000 and love it...great little travel/family/fun camera when I'm not shooting my D800 for work).

The camera is basically taking the time to "swallow" the image. From what I understand the sensor has to be "blanked to be read" (borrowing an answer from Luminous Landscape). So Sony is either doing it all so quickly we don't notice, or doing it some other way.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 18:01 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2499 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ari Aikomus: Which ACR version will be able to open Fuji X-pro2 RAW files??

Probably the next one. DPR usually has a beta release that can open new camera files. I just tried using Raw Therapee to open an X Pro 2 file and it crashed. Might have to use Silkypix.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2016 at 21:20 UTC
In reply to:

linux99: I'd have been a lot more impressed if she'd gone authentic and used a Fed 4. :)

Really good talk - but using B+W film to show how gritty a place is has been kinda done to death.

She did it to de-emphasize the color distractions and allow the viewer to concentrate more on the people, as she explained.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2016 at 20:08 UTC
In reply to:

jkrumm: The tones look very appealing to me, that's my initial reaction.

In fact, I just looked through the whole collection again and I'm really impressed by the quality of both the shadows and the highlights. Seems much less harsh than many cameras. The images look drawn with graphite.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2016 at 21:41 UTC
In reply to:

Paolo Cappelli: Fantastic camera, of course with a high price tag. I opened some raw file with Capture One, and and I'm amazed how the images look similar to the pics that came from a Leica M with film. I do not understand why 'so' many negative comments.

The negative comments are consistent with just about every new product release shown on DPR, especially if the product is different or makes an unusual claim or costs a lot.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2016 at 14:22 UTC

The tones look very appealing to me, that's my initial reaction.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2016 at 14:17 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On article Kodak revives Super 8 with part-digital cine camera (362 comments in total)
In reply to:

vscd: If you look carefully at the CES you will notice a strong retrowave. Sony+Technics come out with new vinyl players and Kodak brings back the film to video. Why not? I like the trend and I still buy books on paper. They got announced to be dead by now, 10 years back...

I asked for two main gifts this Christmas, books and records. I love the records, and the new ones sound fantastic. Mainly they are just more fun than CD's and especially digital files. People visit, you put an album on, they can actually read the notes if interested. Panasonic is smart to bring back the legendary 1200 turntable. You can even see vinyl for sale in Barnes and Noble now. But yeah, 50-70 dollars for the film on this camera sounds absurd.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 14:04 UTC
In reply to:

photophile: Virtually all photos of me (except school photos) from the 1970's - were taken on our then Polaroid camera - and I too can still remember the smell of the chemicals as you pulled the paper out, waved it about in air for a minute or so, then peeled back the two layers to reveal the photo.

by the mid 1980's those same photos had become faded - and by the mid 1990's, you had to look hard to see who's picture it was. I managed to scan some of the better ones during the 2000's - and even then it took quite a bit of PP to get them to look anywhere half decent.

So...memories of childhood ? yes! - but go back to instant photos ?? No thank you. If it wasn't for my school photos, I'd have a hard job telling my kids what I looked like as a kid myself. I'd like to leave 1976 firmly in....1976.

I think they improve the process by the eighties. I have a Polaroid of my brother from around 1984 on the fridge that still looks good.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2015 at 15:52 UTC

We keep my daughter's Instax Wide handy around the house and use it on guests. Kids love it and we can add the photo to the wall right away. Fuji could sell a ton more of these cameras with a few improvements. Haven't tried the printer, but our Canon office printer works well for this if I remember to put paper in it. Straight from iPhone prints look good.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2015 at 14:09 UTC as 24th comment
Total: 279, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »