rainman1978
Joined on
Dec 28, 2011
|
Comments
 |  |  |
| Steamin' Mad by ahrensjt from Angered Subjects (Street Photography) | Smile by Olymguy from Ultra Asian Indian Female Faces | Space Shuttle Cockpit- by vbuhay from Aircraft Control Stick |
Beginner's GuidesGetting Started
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
real world performanceField Test Videos
see how we seeSample Galleries
In-depth ReviewFujifilm X100F
Show CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017
Throwback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days Past
What's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise
2457FeatureWhat is equivalence?
Fuji should have made a wider converter (24mm equivalent), I think 350 is expensive for a 0.8X converter.
Jmmg: btw, maybe just my humble observation, it seem like the new sensor is more noisier than the old one an scarify more detail...is that just me?
I can't tell which is noisier.
I read the work, it was really good and heart touching!
rainman1978: It really depends on what you shoot and your tolerance level for orbs.
It's definitely a goner for night shoot.
Those were some test shots take at ISO100 15secs.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073711/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074081/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073947/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074267/in/photostream
My point is why should I be accepting the flaw when clearly its Fujifilm's fault?
Wouldn't a sensor replacement sounds reasonable?
Anyway I applaud all ranters and DPR for making the threads alive, this should caution all unawared buyers to buy at their own risk.
Unfortunately the orbs look like bad photoshopping.
Nope, that will be like saying DPR making up the same story.
It really depends on what you shoot and your tolerance level for orbs.
It's definitely a goner for night shoot.
Those were some test shots take at ISO100 15secs.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073711/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074081/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073947/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074267/in/photostream
My point is why should I be accepting the flaw when clearly its Fujifilm's fault?
Wouldn't a sensor replacement sounds reasonable?
Anyway I applaud all ranters and DPR for making the threads alive, this should caution all unawared buyers to buy at their own risk.
OMG its a flagship compact.
White flag I supposed.