vscd

vscd

Joined on Feb 1, 2013

Comments

Total: 2582, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM sample gallery (560 comments in total)
In reply to:

retr01976: I am curious how this lens compares to the Fuji 56 1.2. Samples are definitely sharp and images look exactly like the Mark IV.

The Fuji is way worse. You find both MFT diagram on the vendors page. If you compare them, the Fuji is only in the centre circle of 3mm radius as sharp as the Canon... Rest is not nearly as sharp. Image Circle is smaller anyway.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2018 at 19:27 UTC
On article Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM sample gallery (560 comments in total)
In reply to:

Searching: Not any sharper than any of the Olympus 1.2 Pro Lenses or the 75 1.8, might even be a bit less sharp than those.

...depending on the imagecircle it's a different challenge. MFT 50mm 1.2 has nothing to do with FF 50mm 1.2.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2018 at 19:25 UTC
In reply to:

Christoph65: Awful news! I was really hoping they could do it.

No kayzen from Fuji. They shoudl remove "Film" in the Companyname ;(

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2018 at 08:00 UTC
In reply to:

LessMirrored19: Signs of slow death..
The Z wasn't Good enough..

BS.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2018 at 06:19 UTC
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: Makes sense. Pull out, thus compelling people to buy gray, and refuse to repair gray. People can still buy Nikon but they're on their own. If fewer cameras are sold, this is offset by savings from closing or reducing support. People think of gray as a massive criminal conspiracy but it's not. When they count sales in Tokyo, a unit sold is a unit sold.

Yes, but inside Japan there is no border customs, so theoretically no difference between black-, grey- and whitemarkets.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2018 at 06:18 UTC
In reply to:

ybizzle: Nikon's finances have been taking a hit both from Sony and Canon over the years. If they want to avoid bankruptcy, they best start pumping out competitive mirrorless offerings within the next few years. This is it Nikon. Don't become the next Minolta and get bought up.

Yes, and they will be healed by mirrorless. Amen. What a nonsense. The brasilian problem is homemade by a lot of factors and a large greymarket.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2018 at 06:16 UTC
In reply to:

Tom Holly: It’s great that real mirrorless cameras are here. I wonder how long Dslrs will
hold on. Will they be relics within a few years? Or will pro shooters still value them?

Answer:
a [ ]
b [x]

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2018 at 13:18 UTC
In reply to:

The Fat Fish: It tells us that selling old tech at a premium is still Canons goal. That and they have no intention in competing in the hybrid stills/video market.

@HFLM
The results on print are the same but less intense. Watch your words, you're speaking to other people, not your mum.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2018 at 07:40 UTC
In reply to:

The Fat Fish: It tells us that selling old tech at a premium is still Canons goal. That and they have no intention in competing in the hybrid stills/video market.

Let me help you with facts... https://tinyurl.com/y9xb7hwv

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2018 at 17:48 UTC
In reply to:

The Fat Fish: It tells us that selling old tech at a premium is still Canons goal. That and they have no intention in competing in the hybrid stills/video market.

...compare cams from the same year and wait for the soon coming 1DXM3. The Sony will get blown out of the water like in all other years.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2018 at 09:00 UTC
In reply to:

The Fat Fish: It tells us that selling old tech at a premium is still Canons goal. That and they have no intention in competing in the hybrid stills/video market.

@PieterB
That really depends. Canonsensor were always better than Sony beyond ISO800... so if you're in the sportbusiness or use longer focallengths, there is nothing which beats a 1DXM2 (or Nikon D5 in that regard). Pushing shadows with ISO100 is only a theoretical problem in amateuer-forums ;)

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2018 at 07:53 UTC

Packed together it looks like a Lasersword to me. Vader! Hrrrrrrr. Eat this!

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2018 at 20:45 UTC as 47th comment

The Canon 40 mm f2.8 STM is a fantastic lens and costs about 120€. This is so nonsense, it could be from Leica. But leica at least makes decent products...

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 19:38 UTC as 83rd comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

raminm: It looks like a better camera than the new Canon EOS R in almost all aspects for less price.

Oh, it's funny how the Fuji-Lovers create their own world to rectify their purchases ;) Don't get me wrong, the X-T3 is a great cam, but it doesn't get better if you hate other bodies and nag on Nikon or Canon. People will buy them very likely and there is nothing on the Fuji which gives you the look of a 50mm f1.2 on fullframe.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2018 at 07:53 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T3: what you need to know (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: After exactly 4 years, this is the first apsc camera really (slightly) beating my beloved samsung nx1. Think where Samsung would have been, had they continued with nx line.

...and I still program on it. Sadly, Adobe does not support the C64 for Lightroom anymore. ;) But I still have Amicapaint.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2018 at 07:45 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T3: what you need to know (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pixel Pooper: Those AF specs sounds familiar. I wonder if Sony gave them the A6500's 425 point PDAF system to help in the fight against Canikon.

Didn't know that the Sony A6300 had a x-trans...

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2018 at 11:43 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T3: what you need to know (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peter62: What a summer full of new cameras!

The X-T3 seems to me to be the most promising new camera, although it does not have a full frame sensor. But the earlier Fuji cameras were already extremely low noise and very close to full frame. And the lenses are unbeatable anyway!

So, my summary:

Canon EOS R - disappointing. Price will fall very soon to 1500 Euro.
Nikon Z6/Z7 - you have to wait. But probably no A7 (R) III killer.
X-T3 - most promising to date!

Yepp, and if you add on this that the Fuji-ISO is more or less one stop off, then you get a difference of 2 stops to fullframe. That doesn't mean that this cam is not superb anyway, but I guess the real difference to a D850 is full 2 stops (same exposuretime and t-stop)

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2018 at 11:42 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T3: what you need to know (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: After exactly 4 years, this is the first apsc camera really (slightly) beating my beloved samsung nx1. Think where Samsung would have been, had they continued with nx line.

Amiga was the best computer.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2018 at 11:41 UTC
On article DPReview TV: Fujifilm X-T3 hands-on first impressions (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZeBebito: WOW, the Canon R is old news already!

I'm not sad...Just sayin'. My best pictures were (recently) taken on film. Not because film is better but I spend more time per picture. The current white house photos can be taken with old Nokias... still too good.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2018 at 13:32 UTC
On article DPReview TV: Fujifilm X-T3 hands-on first impressions (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZeBebito: WOW, the Canon R is old news already!

@photomedium
Pete Souza used this crap to make 8 years of fantastic footage of Obama, Mc Curry did his jobs with Canoncrap. If your knowledge is at least 1% of your mouth you should be famous. But I never heard of you. And very likely never will...

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2018 at 13:13 UTC
Total: 2582, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »