vscd

vscd

Joined on Feb 1, 2013

Comments

Total: 2777, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

The problem is not 500px.com, alone, but the fear in countries for titties. You can show weapons or nazi-symbols but a breast is NSFW and get's hidden. On Facebook you even get banned for this... stupid rules.

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2018 at 08:02 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

sohus: Fuji, the only company that truly cares about their customers. Kaizen is the way to go and it is an absolute atrocity that Canon, Nikon and Sony don't update their cameras after launch (besides the absolute minimum).

And don't give me "that's because they release finished cameras and Fuji doesn't" since that is simply not true. Fuji cameras are perfectly capable and functional at launch, as confirmed by the review of the T3 here. But once a camera is in the field, companies collect user feedback (including from professionals in reviews). If they can address 10% of those issues, they do an amazing job.

Canon, Nikon and Sony just release a new body 6-24 months later and tell customers to upgrade. The keep promising in interviews that they will change their behavior, but never do. Time to start calling them out.

@FatFish
You have no glue what the EOS-R can do and what not. Or are you an engineer from the company? The video features from the X-T2 were also poor and the firmware alone improved them alot. Apart from any hardwarechanges. Now please ST-FU and just wait what comes or what not. if nothing comes you can troll on...

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2018 at 21:23 UTC
In reply to:

sohus: Fuji, the only company that truly cares about their customers. Kaizen is the way to go and it is an absolute atrocity that Canon, Nikon and Sony don't update their cameras after launch (besides the absolute minimum).

And don't give me "that's because they release finished cameras and Fuji doesn't" since that is simply not true. Fuji cameras are perfectly capable and functional at launch, as confirmed by the review of the T3 here. But once a camera is in the field, companies collect user feedback (including from professionals in reviews). If they can address 10% of those issues, they do an amazing job.

Canon, Nikon and Sony just release a new body 6-24 months later and tell customers to upgrade. The keep promising in interviews that they will change their behavior, but never do. Time to start calling them out.

@The Fat Fish
You don't know that yet... the EOS-R is said to be updated soon. Just wait a bit more to spread your hate.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2018 at 22:48 UTC

Someone is searching for good photographers badly....

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2018 at 22:27 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

barrym1966: Oh they missed the most important mount of all...

Not one for me then

Canon has the best color science for me. Not the best dynamic range nor ISO, but in colors it still excels. But, yes that's very subjektiv...

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2018 at 11:10 UTC
In reply to:

ozturert: Canon never takes good photos so even though ypur photos are excellent I didn't like them. I'd love them if you used some Sony camera.
...
...
Sarcasm

@grape jam
No brand war, just a small reality check outside of forums. No Sony was harmed during the takes. The batterylife or a glowing viewfinder @night alone would be a serious problem. Maybe. No Sarcasm.

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2018 at 15:46 UTC
In reply to:

zw1975: Hi pixel count not needed. Hi dynamic range not needed. Hi tonal range not needed. Hi ISO performance not needed. No need to worry about color tone. It seems that the camera really does not matter.

No, but Leica seems to be the best tool for streetphotography... and that's what you see here...

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2018 at 09:08 UTC
In reply to:

Alan2dpreview: After a while, they began to look composed. The originality wears off. They begin to seem constructed not extemporaneous.

Can you tell me how to construct the fork with the net and the birds?

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2018 at 09:24 UTC
In reply to:

zw1975: Hi pixel count not needed. Hi dynamic range not needed. Hi tonal range not needed. Hi ISO performance not needed. No need to worry about color tone. It seems that the camera really does not matter.

In fact he used one of the most expensive cams... A Leica. It's simply a proof against foolish DR discussions or autofocus maniacs. Not more.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2018 at 09:23 UTC

Wow. What a great gallery. Some pictures are really iconic. I really like the high contrast, more dynamic range would totally destroy the mood...

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2018 at 09:20 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

brycesteiner: Is like drinking expired milk?

Yes, but some people also puke on fresh one. The funny thing is... the best milk is cheese. Expired for months. So, maybe the comparision with film is betten than you think.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2018 at 11:36 UTC
In reply to:

PLShutterbug: Ok, the first comment is an off-topic whine.

It’s “... it’s ...,” not “... it’s ...” Please carry the ball for correct spelling. You are titled as “editors,” after all.

@PLShutterbug
Getting caught on being stupid is funny. But getting caught while correcting others, being stupid, is priceless. :)

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2018 at 11:33 UTC
In reply to:

Johnnew Archibald - SMGJohn: Why would you buy this junk that is 90 to 250 dollars for a pinhole camera, like seriously? You can buy used vintage cameras for 25 bucks off eBay that are not bad at all with ACTUAL optics.
Now I see why aliens wont come visit us but its a shame really because I wish they take me with them and the rest of sorry humans who no longer wish to remain in this idiosyncrasy society.

@Johnnew
You don't understand handcraft and what's photography is all about...

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2018 at 11:24 UTC
On article Gallery update: The Nikon Z7 goes wrestling (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Johannes Zander: Finally we got some pictures of sony fanboys.

Muahahaaaa...

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2018 at 11:17 UTC
In reply to:

Via Lactea: Well I took a good look at it at the Photkina, mechanics and ergonomics are suberb combined with a d800-body. bokeh as well, nice 11 diaphragm blades. flare was well controlled. No LOCA !! or CA, you can call it fully apochromatic corrected. Sharpness and microcontast should be tested at different conditions and different distances. But imho it's a high potential lens. From my impression its somewhere near the Sigma ART 135mm f1.8 or the Zeiss 135mm f2 Sonar concerning image quality and build. 595€/$ would be cheap. This lens is worth 1000€. concerning my first impressions I n Cologne.

1000€ with no AF? Hmm, the Canon 180mm L Macro is better and cheaper today...

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2018 at 11:14 UTC
In reply to:

barrym1966: Oh they missed the most important mount of all...

Not one for me then

No. Canon EF is there.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2018 at 11:12 UTC
In reply to:

Tom Holly: Better even than Sony?

@MILC man

Can you use google? That's not "trolling"... but of course for fanboys it cannot be true. Some even replaced the bajonett with other metal-versions. Good Morning.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2018 at 08:44 UTC
In reply to:

malabito: Many Sonys and Fujis :)

How do you follow your object for hours if the screen is black? With binoculars? Possible but not the way it goes... if you want to talk now for whats possible and whats not, just take footballgame for hours. Other anmals, same problem. just face the disadvantages of mirrorless as they are, it's not more or less true than the advantages which are repeated on and on.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2018 at 13:14 UTC
In reply to:

PieterB: This kind of price range is way beyond my possibilities but if I had to choose between the Nikon z7 and the Canon R, I would opt for the Nikon.
Ibis is always very useful and the video is also much better.

@User9362470513
The lenses are large because they are very fast. Nikon does not even have f1.2 lenses yet. The Nikon f0.95 will be very large too. But you have the possibility to compare exactly the same lenses on both cams. 35mm f1.8. You would wonder who has the smaller lens then: https://camerasize.com/compact/#799.790,794.785,ha,t

Fact check is nice, isn't it? And the Canon has even IS in it, the Nikon not.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2018 at 13:07 UTC
In reply to:

Tom Holly: Better even than Sony?

@Magnar W.
Even for $5 the bayjonett has not to get broken out of the body.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2018 at 13:04 UTC
Total: 2777, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »