vscd

vscd

Joined on Feb 1, 2013

Comments

Total: 1393, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

998 own it. 1000 want it. Seems mirror-equiped bodies are still the way to go ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2017 at 07:15 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

sknai16: Thanks to Sigma and Tamron for giving us wonderfully good glass for our CaNikon housings at 60% of the CaNikon price.

They are all newer than the lenses from Canon/Nikon. If Canon brought up a new version like the 35mm f1.4 L II, the Sigmalenses got doomed. But competition is very nice, anyway ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2017 at 08:03 UTC
In reply to:

Babka08: The new range of Sigma lenses are so much nicer designed than previous and also than Tamron. Somebody high up in Sigma has really revolutionized that part of their business.

Definately. I used the new 45mm f1.8 VC and this it's at least as good as the Sigma Art lenses (from the buildquality)... I even like the design more, but that's personal taste.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2017 at 08:01 UTC

Hey Sigma, I wanted your 24-70 2.8 lens but I'm now waiting since months to get anything like a review or a possibility to test it. Now Tamron comes up with a new 24-70 2.8 VC and I will definately wait for this lens as comparision. As you often don't seal your lenses (but Tamron does) I'll tend to the new Tamron instead. Your fault.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2017 at 08:00 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
On article Report: Ricoh announcing cost cuts in face of crisis (283 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Davinator: As Ricoh makes most of its money from printers, if sales plummet there, the imaging division is at risk. I have a feeling we will be seeing the end of the Pentax brand much as we did Minolta, Contax, Bronica, etc. It's a shame as I've long enjoyed Pentax film and digital gear.

Not to forget the samsung NX series.

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2017 at 21:29 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2209 comments in total)
In reply to:

boni bonev: I was able to try the new Fuji X-T2 with different lenses. As a wedding photographer with 20 years of experience, I can only say - this camera is slow. In low light it is terribly slow, much slower than new Panasonic models ( but they of course are limited by ISO) . Compared to my old Nikon D3s X-T2 is far far away if you want to capture spontaneous moments in low light.

Do you really come up with this question after 4 months? That's an example of "slow" ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2017 at 21:26 UTC
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2679 comments in total)
In reply to:

vscd: [...]The list of qualms I have with the a7-series in particular is full of items that, on their own, are quite insignificant; but as the list grows, they all combine to make for cameras that I almost never choose for personal work or play.[...]

Couldn't describe it better. The specs were always fantastic, but working with it was a pain. If I tried to reshape that phrase in comments I got a lot of hating... beeing a "fanboy" of (insert brand here). That's the reason why everyone want the sensors of Sony in a cam from Nikon or Canon.

I don't call you retarded. I know you are. ;) All I hear from you is "mimimimiiii"

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2017 at 07:52 UTC
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2679 comments in total)
In reply to:

vscd: [...]The list of qualms I have with the a7-series in particular is full of items that, on their own, are quite insignificant; but as the list grows, they all combine to make for cameras that I almost never choose for personal work or play.[...]

Couldn't describe it better. The specs were always fantastic, but working with it was a pain. If I tried to reshape that phrase in comments I got a lot of hating... beeing a "fanboy" of (insert brand here). That's the reason why everyone want the sensors of Sony in a cam from Nikon or Canon.

@osv.
I don't want to look smarter. Smart is no "look". How old are you? ;) In a real live situation you would be a small kid with no big mouth as you would get a punch in your face if you would be so mean to other people. But here anonymously, in the comments of a photoreviewsite you are very offensive and you like to nag on other people. Does it work for you? Do you have friends? Outside of here? Hmm...

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2017 at 21:08 UTC
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2679 comments in total)
In reply to:

vscd: [...]The list of qualms I have with the a7-series in particular is full of items that, on their own, are quite insignificant; but as the list grows, they all combine to make for cameras that I almost never choose for personal work or play.[...]

Couldn't describe it better. The specs were always fantastic, but working with it was a pain. If I tried to reshape that phrase in comments I got a lot of hating... beeing a "fanboy" of (insert brand here). That's the reason why everyone want the sensors of Sony in a cam from Nikon or Canon.

@osv
Film is not better. As apples are not better than oranges. They are *different*. Like different viewfinders. If you grow up you will understand.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2017 at 19:08 UTC

This Boeing is mirrorless, is dynamic and has range. And the best thing: It has no Canon.

(Proof taken)

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2017 at 19:06 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2679 comments in total)
In reply to:

vscd: [...]The list of qualms I have with the a7-series in particular is full of items that, on their own, are quite insignificant; but as the list grows, they all combine to make for cameras that I almost never choose for personal work or play.[...]

Couldn't describe it better. The specs were always fantastic, but working with it was a pain. If I tried to reshape that phrase in comments I got a lot of hating... beeing a "fanboy" of (insert brand here). That's the reason why everyone want the sensors of Sony in a cam from Nikon or Canon.

@osv
You are a retarded kid which want's to be important in a forum. DSLRs are defined to be dead since 6 or 7 years but it seems that no one cares ;) . I have both viewfinders and would take a OVF over an EVF anytime except of some cases where I need a focuspeaking or specific information onscreen. I wait for a hybrid screen with the advantages of a real OVF and some overlayer EVF-Infos.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2017 at 18:20 UTC
On article How water droplets came to life for a Gatorade ad (103 comments in total)

Nice ad for a mediocre product.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2017 at 21:37 UTC as 31st comment
On article Fujifilm X-A3 added to studio scene comparison (103 comments in total)
In reply to:

tolleknolle: Sigma Merrill and dp2 Quattro RAW conversions: now that blows your mind...

Yepp. If the picture can be taken @BaseISO, with good light and not much DR-needs then the FoveOn blows everything out of the water. Including the new Pentax/Hasselblad/Fuji "medium"-format. Great sensor. ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2017 at 06:42 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro Moreira: About the same price as canon 8-15 which is constant f4

It's still a big deal if you want to use it for movies...

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2017 at 11:50 UTC
In reply to:

JohnnyFl: Nice now were talking, but Canon please put some money into a developing a decent FF mirrorless ILC camera please!

Correct, 65mm has nothing to do with DOF, it's only about the quality and tonal range. Especially in the Hateful Eight it's spectacular, or in the Revenant.

The Dynamic Range and the way how the highlights are not clipping is awesome. I really like it, even if I wouln't dare to make this by my own. Away from the cost-factor.

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2017 at 18:40 UTC

Yes, a Canon did this! ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2017 at 18:33 UTC as 6th comment
On article DPReview on TWiT: Is the Sony a9 worth $4500? (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

FuhTeng: Anyone else in favor of a ignore list for the comments sections too? The anti-Sony trolls are tiresome.

I guess this is paybacktime from the Canonguys for the Sonytrolls in their commentssection ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 22:09 UTC
In reply to:

JohnnyFl: Nice now were talking, but Canon please put some money into a developing a decent FF mirrorless ILC camera please!

The bests films are recorded in film anyway ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 21:30 UTC
In reply to:

FLruckas: Hmmm....
We'll have to see how good the internal raw really is.....
Interesting that it's already supported in Resolve...

Price is high....

But still could give Blackmagic a run for it's money....

Big pluses...
Dual pixel autofocus
Low light....
DR
RAW...

Minuses

Price...
Electronic ND if it has it isn't as reliable....

I wonder if any of the CF to SSD breakout boxes will work with it.

Draw...

Canon Color VS Blackmagic color etc....

Hopefully I'll get to see one in a few days...

@Tommy K1
Maybe he's an japanese writer. Writing from top to the bottom and then starts a new line at the top ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 21:28 UTC
In reply to:

stevevelvia50: The next version will have famous photographer modes...Ansel Adams mode, Cartier Bresson mode, lee Friedlander mode....will only allow the shutter release if framed like the chosen famous photographer lol.

But the likes will bea erned by the cam, too. Nothing for facebook, then ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 20:02 UTC
Total: 1393, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »