StefanD

Something like this? https://nl.ifixit.com/Guide/Disassembling+Panasonic+LUMIX+DMC-LX100/55603?lang=en

I cleaned the sensor myself using this guide: https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Disassembling+Panasonic+LUMIX+DMC-LX100/55603

It takes some experience with electronics, but it's not very difficult to...

The low-light capabilities are determined by the total amount of light reaching the sensor. (and of course the sensor technology) For comparable sensors, the sensor getting the most light will have ...

I'm flabbergasted.
But probably there are people who will actually buy such a thing.

A larger diameter will indeed also benefit lens design. (Up to a certain size of course.) I was comparing the RF mount to the EF mount and AFAIK, both are the same width. Canon probably concluded ...

It's indeed a useful range. Comes quite close to my Canon 17-40 f/4 in focal length range, equivalent aperture and, as it seems, size.

You're totally right,  but you ended up in the wrong forum: "Welcome to the Canon EOS R Talk Forum, the place to discuss Canon EOS R digital cameras and RF lenses."

Flange distance is one of the restrictions lens designers have to deal with. By shortening the flange distance, lens designers have more freedom in designing a lens, which may result in better ...

The modern way is still the same: choose a focus-point as close to your subject as possible and recompose if necessary. Big difference is that modern camera's are able to focus at almost every ...

Well... actually there are two wrongs with focus and recompose: - By rotating the camera, the plane of focus moves and probably the focus will move away from your subject. - By moving the camera, ...

Search the paper for "Because the focusing element (“focus lens” in Figure 24 above) is small and lightweight the focusing actuator deploys a Nano USM (new Thin-type)"

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22focus+and+recompose%22 This is a technique that was quite useful in an era when camera's had only a limited number of focussing points, often not exactly at the position of ...

That's correct. 1.4 vs 1.7 is about 50% more light per area. But the sensor in the LX100 is about 5 times as big as the one in the LX7, so the total image will be created using much more light.

Please note that the f-number is a ratio (of focal length and entrance pupil), so the value itself cannot be compared between lenses with different focal lengths. For example: you could generally ...

I share your anticipation of the 16-35, but why would you expect the 70-200 F/4 to take advantage of the R mount? The rear element of the EF version is placed at quite some distance from the ...

Maybe an even better solution is to move the focus point to the desired location? I assigned "focus area set" to the FN1 button. When I press that button, I can easily move the focus point to the ...

There indeed does not seem to be a setting to achieve that, but the AF/AE lock button provides an alternative: you can assign AF to it, leaving AE to the shutter button.

That depends on the implementation: if the camera gives a warning when it can't copy its files over wifi, there's no need to worry.

The manual says that there's an option to send either compressed or original files, so that should not be a limitation. I guess each image will take a few seconds to be transferred, so it depends ...

The EOS R seems to offer a way to backup your photo's; page 446 of the user guide says: "Sending images to a smartphone automatically as you shoot. Your shots can be sent automatically" Of course, ...