StefanD

I use the Sirui T-025X with C10S ballhead to my full satisfaction. It is no longer available, but I would certainly look at Sirui if I needed a replacement.

Third party lenses can already be used on the RF mount. You just need an EF-RF adapter to use them. I can imagine that licensing the full RF mount would force Canon to share information about the ...

A Canon lens on a Nikon body. There have been times that you would be banned from forums even suggesting it. :-)

And it should be :-) I'm a happy RP user for about two years now, and occasionally use it for shooting hockey matches to my full satisfaction. Although it's totally acceptable to me, I can see what ...

It hasn't changed. If you often use continuous shooting on moving subjects, then the RP is not the camera for you. To be clear: its AF is very capable in following moving subjects and taking good ...

I did some experiments with my RP & EF 24-70 4.0 on flowers. The results were very good IMHO. I read some comments on the desirability to have the camera do the stacking, but there's at least one ...

It's not relevant whether the corners are vignetted 100% or 99%, what matters is the end result. It's widely known that this lens has been designed taking the possibilities of digitally correcting ...

Yes, it does. I bet there are many EF-S and RF-S lenses that show even more vignetting on a full frame sensor than the RF 16. I know that this statement, although true, has no value in the real ...

I can second this. I use my 24-70 F/4 extensively on my RP and it works great. AF works better than on the 1Ds III I had before, but that's of course because of the body. It does show that the ...

My first was the 50 F/1.8 type I for a RF50 F/1.8. I recently bought an RF 16 2.8 and I guess I will part with my EF 17-40, after comparing the first results at 16 vs 17mm.

I would like to meet that chicken

There are enough lenses available, but a lot of them require an adapter. For some, that indeed is a problem, but for others it provides an opportunity to use existing lenses. Personally, I don't ...

You're obviously not a fan of massive digital correction, but are still a Canon shooter? Are you aware that Canon uses Bayer sensors that provide awful output when not corrected? In the end result, ...

I didn't notice it yet, but my RP does the same. After the 17mm setting is reached, it seems the camera needs a little time to apply corrections registered for the 17mm setting. It only does this ...

Absolutely. It will work like it's intended to work. It's reasonably powerful and when you decide you want more, you can always resell it without much loss. I use my old 580EX to full satisfaction ...

There's quite some info here: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4330763 Basically, they keep the camera turned on and take a picture every 30 seconds. If you take pictures faster, you'll be ...

The OP's logic is sound, I think, but I don't get your logic. How does buying an additional camera not add any weight? I would be surprised if either R7 or R10 are lighter than a 1.4 extender. And ...

I use my EF 85 f/1.8 on my RP and like it a lot, so yes: it's worth getting an adapter for. But: If it's your only EF lens and don't plan on getting another EF lens, I would first check if I could ...

I'm convinced that you will be able to use EF-S (and EF) lenses on an RF-S body with the standard RF to EF converter.

Except for long telephoto reach, I do not see any advantage of an RF crop body. maybe the lenses can be a little smaller, but they will still use the an RF sized mount, so they can't be made that ...