-
I use the Sirui T-025X with C10S ballhead to my full satisfaction. It is no longer available, but I would certainly look at Sirui if I needed a replacement.
-
Third party lenses can already be used on the RF mount. You just need an EF-RF adapter to use them. I can imagine that licensing the full RF mount would force Canon to share information about the ...
-
A Canon lens on a Nikon body. There have been times that you would be banned from forums even suggesting it. :-)
-
And it should be :-) I'm a happy RP user for about two years now, and occasionally use it for shooting hockey matches to my full satisfaction. Although it's totally acceptable to me, I can see what ...
-
It hasn't changed. If you often use continuous shooting on moving subjects, then the RP is not the camera for you. To be clear: its AF is very capable in following moving subjects and taking good ...
-
I did some experiments with my RP & EF 24-70 4.0 on flowers. The results were very good IMHO. I read some comments on the desirability to have the camera do the stacking, but there's at least one ...
-
It's not relevant whether the corners are vignetted 100% or 99%, what matters is the end result. It's widely known that this lens has been designed taking the possibilities of digitally correcting ...
-
Yes, it does. I bet there are many EF-S and RF-S lenses that show even more vignetting on a full frame sensor than the RF 16. I know that this statement, although true, has no value in the real ...
-
I can second this. I use my 24-70 F/4 extensively on my RP and it works great. AF works better than on the 1Ds III I had before, but that's of course because of the body. It does show that the ...
-
My first was the 50 F/1.8 type I for a RF50 F/1.8. I recently bought an RF 16 2.8 and I guess I will part with my EF 17-40, after comparing the first results at 16 vs 17mm.
-
I would like to meet that chicken
-
There are enough lenses available, but a lot of them require an adapter. For some, that indeed is a problem, but for others it provides an opportunity to use existing lenses. Personally, I don't ...
-
You're obviously not a fan of massive digital correction, but are still a Canon shooter? Are you aware that Canon uses Bayer sensors that provide awful output when not corrected? In the end result, ...
-
I didn't notice it yet, but my RP does the same. After the 17mm setting is reached, it seems the camera needs a little time to apply corrections registered for the 17mm setting. It only does this ...
-
Absolutely. It will work like it's intended to work. It's reasonably powerful and when you decide you want more, you can always resell it without much loss. I use my old 580EX to full satisfaction ...
-
There's quite some info here: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4330763 Basically, they keep the camera turned on and take a picture every 30 seconds. If you take pictures faster, you'll be ...
-
The OP's logic is sound, I think, but I don't get your logic. How does buying an additional camera not add any weight? I would be surprised if either R7 or R10 are lighter than a 1.4 extender. And ...
-
I use my EF 85 f/1.8 on my RP and like it a lot, so yes: it's worth getting an adapter for. But: If it's your only EF lens and don't plan on getting another EF lens, I would first check if I could ...
-
I'm convinced that you will be able to use EF-S (and EF) lenses on an RF-S body with the standard RF to EF converter.
-
Except for long telephoto reach, I do not see any advantage of an RF crop body. maybe the lenses can be a little smaller, but they will still use the an RF sized mount, so they can't be made that ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
StefanD has not added any gear yet.
Total messages |
552 |
Threads started |
20 |
Last post |
3 months ago |
|