Pat Cullinan Jr

Well, what's the verdict then?

Conserving the cultural heritage is fostered by technology like this. Granted, most content is inconsequential or evanescent, but some of it survives. Now if only we could get people to shoot...

Enjoy it for Christmas!

>equivalent aperture also gives an idea of low-light performance, since it also describes how much light is available across the sensor's area.

Absolutely not true.

Communists will be communists.

> their commenters in general have more vitriol than DPR, if you can believe that

Isn't that stretching the limits of credibility? We have more ^#^&**# vitriol than any other @**&%#%^s on the...

Beautiful nature scenes. Also cityscapes. And dogs!! Would've liked to see some full-rez images.

Yes, it gives them a bad name.

AND ONLY THREE IMAGES? What's the matter with them?

This here is just about the most crankiest forum in the whole place.

No viewfinder.

1) The "catalog nonsense" is one reason I rejected Lightroom.
2) The other reason is that you can't make selections. The LR Adjustment Brush falls short. If I'm wrong, please enlighten.

Good question.

Is it that simple?

That's a black mark against Macphun.

= "snout," duh.

Stop this nonsense now.

On target, Rich!

Draw me an anteater, Hank. ;)

And coffee stains.

Today is yesterday tomorrow, so don't blink.