Pat Cullinan Jr

Pat Cullinan Jr

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 21, 2010

Comments

Total: 1092, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

I hate Adobe.

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2017 at 08:38 UTC as 4th comment

Would DPR be willing to offer an evaluation?

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2017 at 08:35 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

Pat Cullinan Jr: Next -- Google to charge for searches?

Get people addicted, then reel them in without mercy.

When did this start?

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2017 at 02:35 UTC

Next -- Google to charge for searches?

Get people addicted, then reel them in without mercy.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2017 at 07:27 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies
On article Fujifilm GF 32-64mm F4 R LM WR sample gallery (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pat Cullinan Jr: Image no. 6 -- lower left -hand corner nice and sharp, lower right-hand corner not as sharp. Still, an impressive image quality. Or not?

Ha ha!

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2017 at 04:42 UTC
In reply to:

DPPMetro: This company is hysterical and a perfect example of the disaster eastern Germany still is.

Please maintain a professional demeanor, avoiding vulgarity and boorishness. To do less is to degrade the reputation of DPReview.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2017 at 23:38 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

surlezi: No EVF, come on Nikon, this is 2017 !

Dr Blackjack,

"Stop making fun of others and let's enjoy photography"

That's the key, folks. Let's be good to each other and avoid sarcasm and digs. Please? It's for the sake of a more professional DPReview forum.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2017 at 22:09 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

vesa1tahti: D500 vs D7500: D500 does not have an integrated flash. IQ is on the same level. So, the D7500 is the better choice.

D500 no built-in flash?! Argh!

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2017 at 22:51 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

surlezi: No EVF, come on Nikon, this is 2017 !

Dear phazelag and blackcoffee17,

Correct and well put

Pat

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2017 at 22:43 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

phazelag: Its amazing when I see new DSLRs I don't even click on them anymore at all. I haven't for years now. I remember when I was so excited to see a new one and now I just smirk when I see them released. I try not to be jaded, I just can't play that game anymore.

Check.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2017 at 22:30 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: Had to double check my calendar, thought it was a throw back Thursday special here!!!

ttran has a point -- this seems to be another marcher in the iteration parade. Still, it looks like a nice instrument.

If you disagree with an opinion, address it with facts and reasoning, not with sandbagging.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2017 at 22:11 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

surlezi: No EVF, come on Nikon, this is 2017 !

Sales performance doesn't necessarily imply quality.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2017 at 22:08 UTC
In reply to:

ewelch: This is hardly an original idea with Microsoft. And considering how Windows 10 (including the server versions) has ramped up their spying on people to sell their data to others makes me wary of supporting anything they do. On top of that, the vast majority of Microsoft hardware products are not innovative, or even make it to market.

It is theoretically a great idea. But Microsoft won't be making them, Sony is most likely the manufacturer who could do it.

all governments are fundamentally evil, and anti human, anti privacy, and almost all lean toward fascism

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2017 at 07:48 UTC
On article Fujifilm GF 32-64mm F4 R LM WR sample gallery (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pat Cullinan Jr: Image 25 -- big blurry fence-top. We can do better than that.

Please don't shoot so much contre jour.

Laugh with blurry foregrounds and blurry foregrounds will laugh with you. :)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 00:35 UTC
On article Fujifilm GF 32-64mm F4 R LM WR sample gallery (140 comments in total)

Image no. 6 -- lower left -hand corner nice and sharp, lower right-hand corner not as sharp. Still, an impressive image quality. Or not?

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 11:19 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
On article Fujifilm GF 32-64mm F4 R LM WR sample gallery (140 comments in total)

Dan, would you care to venture any opinions or observations about this lens?

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 11:08 UTC as 14th comment
On article Fujifilm GF 32-64mm F4 R LM WR sample gallery (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

virtualreality: Still no f/2.8 zoom lens?

That was a joke. I'm not saying it was funny.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 11:05 UTC

The second example looks too good to be true.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2017 at 07:37 UTC as 31st comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Mr Kobayashi: I'm not saying this technology isn't impressive...

I'm just saying, if your into photography for artistic purposes and you're deleting everything that get's in the way and replacing with fake images...

Take up painting. You'll be in control. Might I suggest photorealism?

Yah, it's the fake thing that bothers me.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2017 at 07:36 UTC
In reply to:

davev8: it probably can get rid of water marks then

>get rid of water marks

I got grease stains.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2017 at 07:35 UTC
Total: 1092, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »