Pat Cullinan Jr

Pat Cullinan Jr

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 21, 2010

Comments

Total: 1124, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

capeminiol: I just finished designing an invisible camera. Wait for it on Kickstarter. What's even better is that it takes invisible pictures.

That was an invisible reply.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:54 UTC
In reply to:

capeminiol: I just finished designing an invisible camera. Wait for it on Kickstarter. What's even better is that it takes invisible pictures.

'

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:53 UTC
In reply to:

dstate1: Did they mean "unpresidented"?

.
Please, no politics.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:52 UTC
In reply to:

KubeKube: If they throw the chick from the video along with the camera - I'll buy two.

Skip the chicken, give be the pastrami.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:49 UTC
In reply to:

mcshan: A camera made for for skinny pretty girls?

Or is it "pretty skinny" pretty girl.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:48 UTC
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: At 0:13 there is a strange looking camera. Or is that the clip on?

.
>Clip on

Clip-on what? Coffee pot? Back-scratcher? Megaphone?

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:47 UTC
In reply to:

jagge: Come on its pretty marketing bait and you all did bite... Now Yashica is just a name now, the talk of a "big comeback" is a joke and Dpreview surely knows but this site is about click bait now... Just go to Cameralabs instead..

¡Vaya, buey!

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:42 UTC
In reply to:

Lightpath48: A camera like I had when young, and a mysterious young girl in black and white like I did for forty-plus years. Enchanting. It revives a long-forgotten mystique, but is there anything behind it in terms of a product I'd buy? Probably not.

I can understand the mystique of cameras that gave happiness in our youth.

And the films -- I had a special feeling when I opened my first box of Kodachrome II.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:39 UTC
In reply to:

Jonas Rask: That camera she’s holding is NOT an old electro 35.
It’s much smaller, and the details are different. She is holding the new camera. I’m sure of it.

To me it looks like a knish.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:33 UTC

This pitch is like someone talking to himself with a megaphone.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:31 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

Tons o Glass 0 Class: In the previous videos, she appears to be holding an Electro 35 GSN at least some of the time. In this newest video (and at the 20s mark in The Silence of Story), the camera's much smaller. What's she holding in these instances? Any Yashica fanatics out there recognize it?

When I want to rest my thumb, I go to bed.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 18:27 UTC
In reply to:

Pat Cullinan Jr: Adobe is a dirty rat.

@Reilly Diefenbach

Shut up, grandpa.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 19:29 UTC
In reply to:

Pat Cullinan Jr: Adobe is a dirty rat.

Argh! My deepest apologies to the rats of this world!

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 19:23 UTC

Adobe is a dirty rat.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 18:51 UTC as 29th comment | 9 replies
On article Tamron SP 24-70mm F2.8 G2 sample gallery (95 comments in total)
In reply to:

Abu Mahendra: Oh jeez,,,review the thing already!

Yeah.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 07:54 UTC
In reply to:

GrahamHO: I will certainly be getting a rear filter holder for my 14mm Canon Sigma. My only experience with rear filters was with the Bolex H16 I used extensively. It had a slot and the filter was in a frame making it very easy to change. Dust from film could be a problem but with normal care not really a big problem. With the Sigma it appears the filter gel will not be mounted in its own frame ( apart from the holder ) Great care will need to be taken cutting and handling the gel. But this is a lens that needs to be used with care and some planning. Hopefully there will be a gel cutting template provided with the holder. The fitting of the rear holder looks simple but for the price of an extra $20 I'll be getting it fitted to retain warranty. Those 3 retaining screws are very small. Presumably longer replacement screws are provided. It's a great lens after a week so far.

.
Bolex H16! ¡Vaya!

I used an H8-Rex with a trio of jewel-like Switar lenses. Kodachrome footage was ultra-snappy. I miss the fun.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 15:28 UTC
In reply to:

aris14: Really good article...

.
Yes!

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 11:47 UTC
In reply to:

Jacques Cornell: Why aren't they providing pricing for all configurations? It's not even clear what the "base" configuration includes.

What is Windows?

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 11:33 UTC
In reply to:

dcMilionis: US$1,700 WHAT !! Ok its exactly the same DSC-RX10 III camera with an upgraded Electronics and same size Articulated LCD but Touch screen (should be bigger), Ok looks great! But was expecting a Effective pixels 28 or 32 mega pixels and faster all round F2 lens at the same focal length but wider and slightly heavier lens, next time in 2019, DSC-RX10 V possibly at $2000. Yes its on my 2017 Christmas List! (I hope)

2.5kg!

That's five and a half pounds!

Gimme gimme gimme.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2017 at 07:23 UTC
In reply to:

Joe Pineapples II: So it's equivalent to a 24 mm f/11 lens on a FF camera? For $1k I would be hoping for something a bit better.

I apologize if I've been the occasion of any affliction of spirit.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2017 at 02:20 UTC
Total: 1124, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »