cameron2

Lives in United States Boston, United States
Joined on Dec 26, 2009

Comments

Total: 125, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Sergey Borachev: This is exciting as well as inspiring. With all the news of gloom and doom, and of companies slowing down in releases of new models and stagnant updates or new features, Sony continues its push ahead of others. The lines like RX100, A7, A9 and RX10... And Sony's efforts should be applauded. 👏👏👏

None of those "upgrades" like D7500, E-M10 III, ... Sure, you have to pay like 150% than expected prices, but isn't it better than paying around the same money again for what's essential a slightly upgraded model?

Not everyone sits around waiting for the next "dot release" of whatever camera that they happen to be shooting. Most people buy a camera, use it (or not) for five to seven years, then buy another.

People who frequent this site tend to buy a camera, use it for a month, buy another camera, and so on ...

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 04:31 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Review (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

MrALLCAPS: Fujifilm XT20 is the better buy.

"Fujifilm XT20 is the better buy."

And there you have it, folks. No explanation given. No reason required.

Truth is, the 3-lens Hassy kit is a better buy.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2017 at 18:19 UTC
In reply to:

panchorancho: Sony dynamic range doesn't even hold a candle to the true power of Nikon! I can't wait for the Sony fanboys to start coming in here declaring it's a Sony sensor, despite Sony being incapable of matching Nikon DR using the same chip! Nikon for life!

Yay! My team is better than yours!

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2017 at 18:06 UTC
In reply to:

MaxiMax: "...love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.”
It doesn't look like that. Not even in this forum.

Unfortunately, a good portion of it looks like a Fox News comment thread ...

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2017 at 00:19 UTC

They make some wonderful lenses. I have some of their manual focus f0.95 m43 lenses, and love them (flaws and all). This one does look huge, but that seems to be par for their lenses.

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2017 at 00:01 UTC as 42nd comment
On article Panasonic Leica DG 15mm F1.7 shooting experience (405 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gimli son of Gloin: Is there a reason to get to consider this combo instead of a ZS100, RX100 or some other pocketable camera?

The mFT cameras became too big and the price tag too high to justify a purchase. On top of that the IQ different between the small sensors are almost indistinguishable and you get more flexibility of the zoom range.

Pricing a mFT lens the same league as a FF lens without their benefits is crazy talk.

Unless you plan to be swapping lenses, or you need some specific capability of a particular system camera, then no, there's no compelling reason.

Compact cameras do quite nicely, and tend to be dramatically more compact than a system camera plus a lens.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2017 at 12:54 UTC
In reply to:

Sannaborjeson: Can't see any confirmation for 32GB on MacBook Pro :-(

The current CPUs support 32GB of DRAM, but only up to 16GB of LPDRAM. To go higher than 16GB increases voltage and power draw, so Apple decided to not support higher amounts of RAM.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 04:00 UTC
In reply to:

erichK: Mega- corp Apple is a disgusting company. Its suppliers (FoxPro) have to put up suicide nets outside their factories. They have every yuppy gimmick but any kind of daycare at their huge megabuck office. They treat their users like illiterate, childish idiots - and do everything they can to turn them into And their products are all about toxic waste and designed obsolescence: Neural Net, the local repair centre just informed me the Apple refuses to supply parts for computers more than three years old ...or even keep them on the part info on their database.

The Chinese company is Foxconn, not "FoxPro" as you claimed, (which is the name of an old database program!)

Chinese companies pay family members if an employee dies. The payment used to be the equivalent of 5 years salary or more, so some employees began to kill themselves to help their families get a large sum of money. The nets were designed to stop this behavior. (The payments have also been reduced, which is far more effective than the nets.)

The manufacturing jobs are hard, but they are considered very good jobs in China.

At any rate, your claims illustrate a staggering amalgamation of ignorance and neuroticism.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 03:51 UTC
On article Sigma SD Quattro H Review (639 comments in total)
In reply to:

cameron2: "The obvious appeal of using an existing mount is that the lenses already exist for it. Sigma produces SA mount versions of 39 of its lenses, which plausibly means the Quattro H has more native lenses available than any other mirrorless camera."

This does not seem to be factually correct, by a long shot. Perhaps there is a qualifier missing?

I meant compared to a mount like m43, with over 50 native (mount + electronic, auto-focus) lenses, and even more if you could the manual focus / native-mount lenses. http://www.four-thirds.org/en/microft/lense.html

Not to take anything away from this camera, as it looks to be a wonderful step forward for the Sigma SA system.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 16:15 UTC
On article Sigma SD Quattro H Review (639 comments in total)

"The obvious appeal of using an existing mount is that the lenses already exist for it. Sigma produces SA mount versions of 39 of its lenses, which plausibly means the Quattro H has more native lenses available than any other mirrorless camera."

This does not seem to be factually correct, by a long shot. Perhaps there is a qualifier missing?

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 16:02 UTC as 155th comment | 3 replies
On article 2017 Roundup: Interchangeable Lens Cameras $500-900 (553 comments in total)
In reply to:

grasscatcher: G85 for me....whichever group it goes in.

Best features in this group.
Best value in the next group up.

Yup, I was surprised that the G85 wasn't even in the list here ... it is a dramatically better package than the Pany cameras that they looked at. I guess there are simply too many to include!

I do like the Fuji selection as the runner-up, though ...

Link | Posted on May 6, 2017 at 02:53 UTC
In reply to:

random78: Olympus often seems to get more limelight in the history of Micro-Four Thirds and mirrorless. However I think the real breakthrough product was the Panasonic G1. Obviously it was the first mirrorless camera, but also it had three important features which ensured that mirrorless will be taken as a serious camera system rather than a glorified P&S. First it offered an EVF experience which was a credible alternative to OVF. The EVFs before G1 were extremely poor whereas G1 had an amazing EVF for that time. Second it had a pretty fast AF in single shot. Third it had a full set of controls expected by DSLR users. The E-P1 from Olympus didn't have any of these features. I am pretty sure that if it was the first mirrorless instead of G1, it would have been dismissed by most reviewers as a 'P&S' camera with a large sensor which did not have what it takes to meet the needs of a 'serious' photographer. G1 ensured that people viewed mirrorless as mini-DSLR, rather than big P&S.

I had a G1. What an amazing camera for its time.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2017 at 04:16 UTC
In reply to:

paulfulper: Four thirds , and micro four thirds ,. What's the difference ? In MM please

Same size sensor. (Often the same sensor was used in some m43 cameras and some 4/3 cameras.)

The big difference is in the lack of a mirror. The 4/3 system was a DSLR, like your typical Canon or Nikon (but the 4/3 sensor was smaller than either APS-C or 35mm.)

Without the mirror, the lenses could be mounted much closer to the sensor. I think they call this the flange distance, or something like that. Smaller bodies. Smaller lenses. (To compensate, they upped the prices.)

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2017 at 04:16 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 real world samples (66 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michiel953: What does this device cost? The image quality is way below par. Despicable.

> What does this device cost?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=panasonic+gx850+cost
(Or just look at the Amazon ad on this page that shows $547.99.)

> The image quality is way below par.
Strange. I looked at the images, and they looked like what one would expect from a modern digital camera with consumer grade glass and a 225mm^2 sensor in a compact consumer-oriented body. Do you have any specific issues that you would like to highlight that show that the image quality is out of the expected range considering, um, say physics?

> Despicable.
Yeah. Good, rational point.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 13:06 UTC
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with new Voigtländer E-mount primes (117 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gregm61: The 35mm f1.4 in M mount is not all that particularly great.

The 35 1.2 in M mount was really good (one of my favorites for that FOV), but it was much larger & heavier than the 1.4. Even though they were a narrower FOV, I preferred both the Voigtlander and the Leica 40mm f1.4 lenses ... (and the Leica 40mm was even affordable.)

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 14:09 UTC
In reply to:

ttran88: Do you have to pay for the update?

That's not a "firmware update"; it's a $99 optional feature on the GH4 and on the GH5. The $99 gets you some sort of code that you input into the camera to enable the feature. Yeah, it's still a dumb idea.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2017 at 23:56 UTC
In reply to:

villagranvicent: The Bugatti Chyron of cameras. Haters enjoy your Corollas.

Camaros*

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2017 at 04:07 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1647 comments in total)
In reply to:

Asarhaddon: it will sell because name is canon
Because there is a klan that thinks canon will do the best
A6300,6500, xt2, Em1 ii better than M5
But name is Canon
No matter what you say to them, their ideas do not change :)

GaryJP - are you suggesting that a shot in RAW from any modern camera with a grey card and a color checker in the scene cannot be processed to the style that you associate with "Canon or Nikon's colour science"? I'm just trying to figure out what magic you are imagining exists ...

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2016 at 13:25 UTC
In reply to:

vadims: Very interesting, DPR... The plot thickens, as they say.

I posted a message here essentially questioning your decision to publish this photo. Long story short: as of the time of this writing, it has 11 "likes". When I click "Most popular (15)", I see posts with 7/8/9 "likes" at the bottom of the list, but not mine. And no, that's not because of numbers of "likes" to replies.

That's a nice touch! A glowing example of "just reporting"/"journalist integrity"/objectivity/etc. right there...

Did my post receive a "black spot"? That would be an honor!

What happens next? You just remove this post?

Link to the original post, just in case:
https://www.dpreview.com/opinion/8871874056/this-image-is-why-the-world-needs-professional-photographers?comment=2720774475

Honestly, I just think that the DPR site is flakey, and nowhere near "real time" on some of its features. It's hard to tell how some of it works (if it even does ...)

p.s. I don't care if you're Russian or from Russia or in Russia. I've got lots of friends from Russia, and lots of friends in Russia. We're all just slightly different looking monkeys with a fascination for wrapping ourselves in fabric ...

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2016 at 16:02 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1647 comments in total)
In reply to:

Asarhaddon: it will sell because name is canon
Because there is a klan that thinks canon will do the best
A6300,6500, xt2, Em1 ii better than M5
But name is Canon
No matter what you say to them, their ideas do not change :)

Canon is a good company and they make good cameras. The m5 sounds like a good camera. However, with the capabilities that it includes, one would have expected this to be the camera that they released two years ago (instead of the m3), and even then it would have been late to market compared to other companies' offerings. So is it a good camera? Yes. Is it good compared to its contemporary peers? No, one cannot seriously argue this.

However, if I still had Canon glass, I would seriously consider this camera as a second body. This is the first "m" that appears to be able to make decent use of the existing lenses. Its usability sounds significantly improved, and it sounds like very few compromises were made vis-a-vis the Canon DSLR bodies that it reuses parts from.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2016 at 14:32 UTC
Total: 125, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »