TheDman

Adobe doesn't make Windows. How is it greed to force people to buy a product that you don't make?

Yep, right on cue. Switching is looking better all the time, it was looking better all the time in 2014, and it will still be looking better all the time in 2021 when you're still bitterly fuming...

Yes, cutting your customer base is the height of greed.

So Adobe's grand 25-year plan was to set up a global software empire as a means of stealing my cat photos? I think you're on to something here...

Exactly! I don't comment on every DxO article that I'm thrilled not to be using C1. Why? Because I'm not jealous of it.

'Setting it up'? It's been that way for 20 years.

Yeah, cutting some of your subscribers really smacks of greed. Great logic.

How would this increase Adobe's profits at all? It could only lessen it.

It's time for all the Chicken Littles who said they were leaving Adobe in 2014 to once again say they're leaving Adobe! But not before they simultaneously complain that Photoshop is too bloated...

We should go shoot all those places that have never been photographed.

"behavior that ranged from assault to [b]unwanted advances[/b]"

The article specifically mentions "behavior that ranged from assault to unwanted advances to comments on their appearance or bodies when they were trying to work".

This has to be the most minor update in lens history.

I get this all the time.
"Wait, did you use Photoshop on this?"
"Yep."
"But that's not what we SEE!!", say a bunch of people who shoot black and white photos.

Certainly to this extent.

Yeah, nobody ever altered film photos!

In 20 years photographers will be whining on DPR about how heavy the new 3-gram Zeiss 24mm is.

How did they get to the cloud in the first place?

So you still believe your photos would be lost in the event of a cloud attack, even if you have them stored locally. That makes a ton of sense.

Don't you ever admit you were wrong?