Louis_Dobson

Louis_Dobson

Lives in Portugal Faro, Portugal
Works as a Computer Consultant
Has a website at www.flickr.com/photos/acam
Joined on Nov 22, 2005

Comments

Total: 113, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

It's very nice, but I'm not sure I understand the point. The resolution is no higher than the hi-res FF cameras, which also have more latitude then you will ever need at low ISO, and I can't see this camera as a high ISO sports camera.

So what can it do that a hi res FF can't?

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 10:53 UTC as 144th comment | 9 replies

Yes, it's the E-M1 II

Looks like a 20mp E-M1 with better DR and C-AF. See what else they have... Hoping for hand held sensor shift.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 16:59 UTC as 152nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Louis_Dobson: I'm not being a fanboy here, I just wondered why Olympus is so rarely mentioned here, since it seems to be the obvious competitor.

As for the camera, without trying it I have no view and without lenses no interest. I'm sure it's a sensible choice if you already have a load of Canon lenses and wish to go mirrorless.

The point is you can go mirrorless at your own pace. Not have to sell every piece of kit you own, at huge effort and a thumping loss, and go out and buy the same functionality in a new brand.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 22:12 UTC
In reply to:

Louis_Dobson: I'm not being a fanboy here, I just wondered why Olympus is so rarely mentioned here, since it seems to be the obvious competitor.

As for the camera, without trying it I have no view and without lenses no interest. I'm sure it's a sensible choice if you already have a load of Canon lenses and wish to go mirrorless.

Sorry Richard, we crossed.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 19:09 UTC
In reply to:

Louis_Dobson: I'm not being a fanboy here, I just wondered why Olympus is so rarely mentioned here, since it seems to be the obvious competitor.

As for the camera, without trying it I have no view and without lenses no interest. I'm sure it's a sensible choice if you already have a load of Canon lenses and wish to go mirrorless.

Panasonic is also MFT.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 19:08 UTC

I'm not being a fanboy here, I just wondered why Olympus is so rarely mentioned here, since it seems to be the obvious competitor.

As for the camera, without trying it I have no view and without lenses no interest. I'm sure it's a sensible choice if you already have a load of Canon lenses and wish to go mirrorless.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 18:27 UTC as 73rd comment | 8 replies
On article History Repeating: Olympus PEN-F Review (1070 comments in total)
In reply to:

Whitesands: I would really like for Olympus to come out with an APSC......Anyone else?

Can't imagine why. It's the least interesting sensor size in my book.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 22:07 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)

What a super camera! Shame they couldn't have managed it a year ago, it would have been a killer. Who wants a not very sporting dSLR now? If I wanted FF I'd pick an A7, sadly.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 17:26 UTC as 481st comment | 2 replies
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

bereninga: How come no one complains that this doesn't have 4K yet everyone gets on Canon's case about it? Anyway, glad to see another FF option out there. This is one of the top qualifiers for an economic FF body. However, I'm not familiar w/ the lens options.

Only a minority of people want video, and they are well catered for by various people, including Canon. Canon are getting stick because having tempted video people in, they are not keeping up. Pentax have never offered much in the video. I'm fine with that, I have no use for it normally, but SOME video is handy to have just in case.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 17:23 UTC
On article History Repeating: Olympus PEN-F Review (1070 comments in total)
In reply to:

Louis_Dobson: Anyone able to tell me if ISO can be assigned to a dial? Aperture plus exp comp plus ISO on dials would be my perfect camera.

Manual is not clear.

Thanks, I have many Olympus camera including an E-M1. Since the E-M1 has only two dials I accept I have to press the video button to get ISO (as I have mine set up, you can also flip the 2X2 switch but then you get useless WB on one dial, which for a raw shooter is just a waste of a dial).

However since the Pen-F has three dials it ought to be possible to have Aperture, Exposure Comp AND ISO all available at the same time.

It's hard to believe Oly could be stupid enough to ignore this chance, and have both dials providing just aperture, but it looks like they are.

In which case this camera is not of interest.

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2016 at 11:07 UTC
On article History Repeating: Olympus PEN-F Review (1070 comments in total)

Anyone able to tell me if ISO can be assigned to a dial? Aperture plus exp comp plus ISO on dials would be my perfect camera.

Manual is not clear.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 20:34 UTC as 151st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Pandimonium: Somebody hold it in front of an A7, I bet it has a Full frame 35mm image circle :p

Er, no, the enormous image circle means they get the best out of the lens. But I bet it DOESN'T cover FF, they're not that soft.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 16:16 UTC
In reply to:

mosc: Pentax 150-450 4.5-5.6 - $1,758.29
Pentax K3 - $729
Equvalent 225-675mm f6.75-f8.4
Maximum physical aperture: 80mm
TOTAL: $2,487.29

Olympus 300 f4
already owned M43 camera
Equivalent 600mm f8
Maximum physical aperture: 75mm
TOTAL: $2,499.99

Why exactly would a human prefer the second choice for their $2,500?

While I accept the principle, the answer is that one may have an M43 system already and not want two systems, and that it is a really sharp lens.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 16:14 UTC
In reply to:

steelhead3: `1/3 the weight....give me a break unless you are comparing it to a 300 2.8.

Yes, but the total light gathering won't.

You can look at this lens as a 300 f4 (which it is) or a 600 f8 equivalent. Either is fine. What is definitely is not is a 600 f4 equivalent.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 16:12 UTC
On article What's missing? Ming Thein on the state of mirrorless (744 comments in total)
In reply to:

fivetonsflax: All I want is OM-D firmware that lets me shoot without shooting data overlaid on the image area. Relatively trivial and it would make such a difference.

And easily available. RTFM. To save you the trouble, press "info" until you have what you want. :-)

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2015 at 15:25 UTC
On article Nikon video hints at long-desired 'digital FM' (551 comments in total)

I'll be interested in this. I love my E-M5, I loved my D3, and I love digital photography, which allows me to produce far better work than I ever could in the 70s, 80s, and 90s.

On the other hand, I hate modern controls. And I have no use at all for video.

Aperture ring and shutter speed dial please.

I'd buy the Fuji X-Pro, but they don't have the lenses I need, so on we struggle with this pesky control layout, for which I blame Canon's early AF cameras.

I've still got a big bag of lenses from my D3 days...

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2013 at 12:30 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

straylightrun: Big surprise. Next is Micro Four Thirds and eventually APS-C before FF becomes the standard in a few years.

Not exactly.

The Nikon 1 and the Pentax Q have sensors small enough to severely compromise image quality.

APS-C is very bulky itself.

There are two sweet spots: if you care about system size, then MFT makes for much smaller lenses than FF and works just as well so long as you don't need high ISO.

If you don't care about system size, FF works very well.

I think the two major format survivors will be MFT and FF, although I thing the Fuji may well survive.

APS-C will become very much a budget alternative for those who can't afford FF.

I went from FF to MFT myself. As a landscape shooter I never go above base ISO, and lugging FF kit about was ruining my hobby. I've never been tempted by APS-C.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 07:00 UTC
On article CP+ 2013: Interview with Olympus' Toshi Terada (242 comments in total)
In reply to:

MatijaK: I did not buy my E-3 because it was compact - I bought it because it was just the right size and had many useful buttons available without being able to press any of them by accident.

Then I added a grip and realized I was sorely mistaken, because only with the grip is the E-3 the right size.

I don't want a compact DSLR. I want a big E-7 that can use my existing grip (or has one built-in), I want it to be heavy, sturdy, reliable and a confidence-inspiring workhorse that I can beat a wild bear with if it attacks me. I can buy an E-720 or an E-M5 if I want more compact.

I've been happily and patiently hanging onto 4/3 and my many lenses, and the only thing that can push me away is a small camera body. If they screw up by making the E-7 small, I'll have to switch systems, despite considering a 3:2 aspect ratio with a 1.5x crop factor to be the spawn of Satan (135 "full frame" being Satan itself).

The attraction of four thirds is that the lens can be better quality and smaller than those for larger sensors. I switched from FT to FF and then to MFT. I miss the FT lenses, they were the best I have ever used.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2013 at 10:05 UTC
On article Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Preview (215 comments in total)

Preview? This has been out months now, where's the full review?

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2012 at 10:16 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply

I want an E-PM2. I suspect I will use it more than the OM-D...

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 10:53 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
Total: 113, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »