Infared

Infared

Lives in United States United States
Works as a Carpenter
Joined on Oct 13, 2009

Comments

Total: 526, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

So...it’s a "stills" camera. Problem solved!
Fine with me! πŸ‘πŸΌπŸ˜›

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2020 at 08:16 UTC as 100th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

aaronbass813: Did anyone believe those were smartphone photos to begin with?

The general public. YES!

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2019 at 15:08 UTC

Hauwei should be banned from US and European markets with there communications equipment. No exceptions. They are NOT to be trusted. The Chinese and their government "can" casually lie about any and everything, including infiltrating the US infrastructure.
It is not all companies...but the Chinese Government is NOT to be trusted.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2019 at 15:07 UTC as 48th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

lehill: Photo #2 - "Bringing the TC into the optical path..."

How do these lenses with built-in TCs implement this? Do they actually slide/swing additional lens(es) into position?

Olympus needs to cut this lens in half so we can see how it's done.

yes...I believe that is what happens....Canon has at least one of these, too....

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2019 at 16:34 UTC

All the anger and nonsense below aside....I would LOVE to slap that lens on my EM1 II, and have a go at it! I would be tickled with the image quality and the files I bet!!!!!

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2019 at 16:33 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

jwilliams: Why do people who obviously do not understand the basics of photography attack the author of the article? Are you offended by the facts about your m43 equipment?

I see the author is/was a scientist. As such he deals in facts and I am sure has the technical knowledge to tell people how lenses relate in different formats or as it is commonly called 'equivalence'.

I'm an engineer by trade and also shoot m43 along with other camera formats. I understand the technical aspects of equivalence. It really is simple stuff. Second grade math is all that is needed to understand it. You do have to concentrate on facts and not incorrect beliefs. Science not religion.

I have zero problem with stating solid facts about how my m43 gear relates to other formats. Apparently some just have such a poor technical knowledge that they cannot understand the facts that have been explained so clearly by more than one article one this site. That, or they treat camera formats like religion.

Religion is tainted facts. Take the Catholic religion for instance.... You do not want that debate, do you?
You got jwillams point. I think that he makes a good one.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2019 at 16:32 UTC

Olympus would have done better to put the port back for the VF insread of making it blue. I did buy a blue shirt this week, though.

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2018 at 14:29 UTC as 46th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

mosc: If there was any reason to buy an 85mm f1.2 Canon, it's also about to die.

I have one and love it..even on a modern FF 5DIV. Super lens...just slow to focus.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2018 at 19:22 UTC

WHOA!!!! That is a MONSTER!!!!! Holy C-word!!!!!!!
LOL!

Link | Posted on May 25, 2018 at 19:21 UTC as 34th comment | 19 replies
In reply to:

Zdman: I really thought DPreview had turned a new leaf a month or so ago. I was inspired to read there was someone new at the helm and was looking forward to some balanced informative articles again. This is the third click bait article in less that a week with skewed playing field with much of the background detail obscured or misrepresented. One can only think the intention of this article is to start a flame war. Dpreview is proving to be quite the troll.

...but here you are, reading and complaining, AGAIN....
😬

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2018 at 11:12 UTC
In reply to:

John S.: Tried out this lens in a local shop, seems nice, sharp and nice bokeh but it is HUGE!!!!! Would never buy it with so many other similar focal lengths that are half the size and weight! Not sure what Sigma was thinking with this one, it must have been designed for APS C or Full Frame with M4/3 being an afterthought!

Yes...it was designed for APS-C.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2018 at 14:16 UTC

Olympus body owner here. For its massive size and performance the Sigma makes no sense "to me" even at this price point. I am keeping my wonderfully petite 15mm P/L and Oly 17mm f/1.8 for my smaller bodies. I just steppped up and bought the 17mm Pro for My E-M1 for the fast focus, excellent weather sealing, fast f/1.2 aperture, snap manual focus ring and superior IQ (Maybe stacking capabilities, too?). If I am going to have a 17mm prime that large in this format...I want it all. It is worth the cost. "To me."
(Did I forget "The feather Bokeh" LOL!). 😬

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2018 at 14:16 UTC as 9th comment

Why would a Leica -user want a budget lens? That is hysterical!!!!

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2018 at 12:23 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies

Olympus 17mm f/1.2 PRO all the way baby........

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2018 at 18:59 UTC as 19th comment

Cool...Grandma is rocking my Blad!!!!!!!!!!!
AWESOME!!!!
I am sick in bed...wonder if I could talk Granny into serving me one of those finished trays of X-1D's with a cup of tea..... :-)
"Oh...yes...I would like one with a lens attached...oh thank you...."

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2018 at 19:12 UTC as 41st comment | 1 reply
On article Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens (387 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Thanks you did't omit the cat picture! Beautiful!!!
PS. My cats are always complaining about sharpnes and bokeh! Really!

What a GREAT name for my new kitty. Bokeh. Thanks. AWESOME!!!!!!
Here...little Bokeh.....here kitty kitty............
He is fuzzy and soft...so he is like walking bokeh.
:-)

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2018 at 19:06 UTC
On article Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens (387 comments in total)
In reply to:

A Girard: I have some lenses that produce lovely bokeh but I think some people lay it on a little thick, sometimes removing the context of the subject matter. Sometimes I see so much bokeh it in itself is distracting.

You are clearly in deep denial. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2018 at 18:41 UTC
On article Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens (387 comments in total)

I should own a 135mm f/1.8 lens with the name Sigma ART on the side for my 5DIV....oh...wait....I DO!!!!
:-)

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2018 at 18:40 UTC as 128th comment
On article Have your say: Best prime lens of 2017 (60 comments in total)
In reply to:

raztec: It's absurd to force people to vote before they can see the results.
What if one hasn't used any of these lenses, but wants to see what people think of them AFTER they've used them?

You were FORCED.!?! LOL! πŸ€œπŸ»β›πŸ”¨πŸ”ͺπŸ—‘πŸ”«βš”οΈπŸ’£

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2017 at 03:33 UTC
On article Have your say: Best prime lens of 2017 (60 comments in total)
In reply to:

J A C S: The average voter would own one or zero of those lenses. It would be fun to watch.

Well...I own 2 of them...and will have three as soon as one ships in the beginning of January. Exciting times to be a photographer! πŸ˜¬πŸŽΆπŸ’©

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2017 at 03:31 UTC
Total: 526, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »