Claes

It starts with "I do not want to insult you, but..." Case closed.

As already stated, it has the same perspective as the human eye. I had a 50 on FF, and it was ok, but it did not get me excited. Got some fine pics of it. I will not buy an 50 equiv lens for fuji, ...

It was just a snap, used to illustrate a point, with a question attached. No offence taken, but you seemed to try though, that is what I replied to, seemed unnecessary.

I tried to be sensitive about it, I fully understand it must be your least favourite part of the whole experience.

In all reviews, and review pics and samples of lenses, they all produce the best bokeh, to my eyes, wide open, right? So I am not sure what to make of this. The underexposure setting was a ...

Also your "When it comes to the image you posted, I don't want to insult you but it's not a very good image and a big part of that can be attributed to user error." That I perceive as harsh, you ...

As I wrote, I was just out testing the camera. No effort was put into it. You do not insult me, as I did not even try. Even if I tried, you are allowed to have an opinion.

Hi, thanks, it looks better for sure, but still not completely there for me. You care to share how? I thought about there being a way to "soften" up, in software.

Well, for a while, it was mess. I worked with a guy in Dublin, who came from a part of the Republic, where you do not pronounce the "T" in many of the "TH" sounds, just the "H". So, thirty three ...

I guess a tilting LCD would make it thicker, but I also want one. About heavier lenses, well, that is another camera, I knew what I bought :) Lovely small camera. The gestures on the lcd do not ...

Your input is valued to me, no bad feelings from me. If I can learn to use my english better, I am all ears. Ok, so the word bad did it. I know it is bad when used on its own, like that is bad ...

Fujicrons, asfaik, are the f2, 23, 35 and 50? Wordplay on an other lens family, I think. It is used here extensively on the forum, I did not even reflect on whether I should use it or not? There ...

There is nothing wrong with the lens, a quirk of it, just move on for me. Not a problem at all. I it is a lovely lens, but I will be aware of its quirk.

For my understanding, how was my reply harsh? I am not a native english speaking person. I did not intend to be harsh. Short, succinct and my opinion, is that harsh when the matter is totally ...

And you guys, what are you on about. This is not a competition. This is what YOU like. There is not one correct answer. If you find the image good, it is good. Really simple. What do YOU think? ...

Well, no need for another thread, was no need for examples from the 50-140 here. But someone posted it saying it has good bokeh, not to me, for the reasons stated. Simple as that. What is ...

Sorry, even in your images here, the bokeh is bad to me. It "duplicates" lines and stuff, do not render it out of focus gently. It can also look angry from time to time.

Well, I mean in the sense of making the camera over achive like smartphones do. With that tiny tiny lens, and tiny sensor, they produce much more than I would have ever thought possible. The sony ...

The software capabilities by phones is well known. But why do not compact cameras get the same level of software sophistication? At least one company both make smartphones and a really good ...

Yeah, lovely little lens it is, fast as, you know what. :)