FocusPuller

Lives in United States Los Angeles, CA, United States
Works as a Assistant cameraman
Joined on Sep 29, 2006

Comments

Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

FocusPuller: Why bother with the glasses? Just implant the camera in your forehead. Pop out to recharge. So cool.

And for selfies, just hold up a mirror. Brilliant.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2018 at 16:29 UTC
In reply to:

tabloid: I think that from now on im going to stay indoors....Nmmm now where did I put that burka. By by privacy, and this is just the begining of it all. Could anybody out there possibly invent a camera jammer.( like a radar jammer).

Privacy? THAT train left the station with your first Google search, Amazon purchase, and Facebook 'friend."

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2018 at 16:24 UTC

Why bother with the glasses? Just implant the camera in your forehead. Pop out to recharge. So cool.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2018 at 16:17 UTC as 32nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

FocusPuller: Can people be this credulous? Seriously.

If the object of posting this "article" was to expose gullible commenters to ridicule, Mission Accomplished. Thanks, moderators. Are all the articles here also fake?

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2018 at 18:33 UTC

Can people be this credulous? Seriously.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2018 at 18:10 UTC as 25th comment | 1 reply

ARRI making a pitch for the next six Transformer movies.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2018 at 17:18 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

FocusPuller: What's the big deal? The US elected an internet hoax President. Welcome to the future.

No, cosanusophile, you didn't hurt my feelings at all. Just the knowledge your side is presented by arrogant dimwits is actually uplifting and wildly entertaining, which is why your idiotic birtherist post roused me to make a rare reply.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2018 at 21:18 UTC
In reply to:

FocusPuller: What's the big deal? The US elected an internet hoax President. Welcome to the future.

trungtran: Premiums were rising faster BEFORE Obamacare, under Bush, if facts mean anything to you.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2018 at 18:28 UTC
In reply to:

FocusPuller: What's the big deal? The US elected an internet hoax President. Welcome to the future.

cosinaphile: As you, in all likelihood, are a rogue russian bot throwing shade in all directions. Vlady's puppet not working out? Better luck next time. Maybe the Klan is more your style?

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2018 at 18:19 UTC
In reply to:

matt1941: well, it doesn't look like a real bomb ... not even a fake one.

So you are an expert on improvised explosive devices. Interesting. Very interesting.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2018 at 17:17 UTC

What's the big deal? The US elected an internet hoax President. Welcome to the future.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2018 at 17:06 UTC as 50th comment | 33 replies
In reply to:

CallumG: And are AI's resistant to stereotypes? What about changing expectations and new and upcoming trends? What about artistic perspective? Art is completely subjective, so I'll trust what actual people say rather than an AI. It sounds like in the future, people are going to be the tools for cameras. I tell the camera what to do, not the other way around!

NO, because what "actual people" will like will be influenced by what GOOGLE liked, and on and on until every photo looks exactly the same.

Link | Posted on Dec 26, 2017 at 19:11 UTC

NO. Just no.

Is a Google NIMA camera next? Won't take the shot unless Google likes it? Enough of this already. Or let's just skip forward a bit and let Google decide what fetuses should be born.

Link | Posted on Dec 26, 2017 at 19:06 UTC as 49th comment
In reply to:

Scottelly: Someone should be fired for that name. A name like that makes me wonder how creative the programmers can possibly be. I think I'll stay away from this crapware until they can come up with a decent name for it. At least then they'll give me a little reassurance that their software might be good too. Did they also use a .cc domain name or something stupid like that?

So you thought "Macphun" was so cool? Got it.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 04:42 UTC

What's next - iPhones refusing to take "bad" shots? What happened to "Think Different"?

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2017 at 16:49 UTC as 4th comment

Can't wait for the ISIS pilots posting their work. Then the patriot pilots will start arming their drones and we can have videos of drone battles everywhere, which we can "like" on Facebook and the Orange Hairball can cheerlead on Twitter.

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2017 at 15:52 UTC as 139th comment
In reply to:

maxnimo: My personal take on this: I absolutely can't stand those extra-wide-angle movies. They just annoy the hell out of me, and only diminish the view of a typical scene. To be fair, however, the only case where such wide angle might be appropriate is something like a documentary on landscapes.

Please stick with the standard HD aspect ratio and don't try to be cute and hip.

YEAH! And what's with sound? Just noise to me. And don't get me started on color - what a distraction. Annoying. My personal take is all scenes should be silent and monochrome. Forget following hip and cute trends.

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2017 at 16:59 UTC
In reply to:

Average User: Wish DPR commenters would avoid political sniping. There are readers here of every view...it's a place where we come to learn and share experiences about photography and equipment... what is funny to folks of one political persuasion, may not be, to the other.

Then again, "reality" is a fit subject for photographers, especially, of "every view."

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 18:45 UTC
In reply to:

johnpendleton: ... and even THIS shows more turnout than the most recent ceremony.

DARN YOU! First thing I thought of and your post was the first one up.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 18:41 UTC

Snarking about photojournalism and second-guessing a real photographer in an incredibly stressful situation on a PHOTOGRAPHY website? I guess many commenters here are more comfortable with fake news than appreciating what will most definitely be a Pulitzer contender.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2016 at 17:49 UTC as 42nd comment | 1 reply
Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »