Joined on Jun 8, 2012


Total: 65, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 (442 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dimac: too big and too ugly and missing things, deleted from my wish list

Well KZMike, judging by the number of likes locke_fc received, you're wrong.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 13:01 UTC
On article Behind the Shot: Spot the Shark (67 comments in total)

Very nice. Simple yet effective, you managed to create a stunning image with a minimal PP work.

It's so easy to get carried away with over-doing the PP these days.

Well done!

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 08:09 UTC as 27th comment
On article FroKnowsPhoto's Video Guide on sale (142 comments in total)
In reply to:

kimchiflower: I used to watch his videos, but after some of his 1-hour clips, I started to realise he could really do with editing his disposable teen humour chit-chat down.

Besides, who pays for online info these days?

"Besides, who pays for online info these days?"

DigiLloyd is reading this comment and laughing his way to the bank ;-)

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2013 at 20:10 UTC
On article Manfrotto 190 Series Carbon Fiber Tripod Review (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

Prognathous: Isn't the 055CXPRO4 a better buy? It's currently cheaper than the new MT190CXPRO3 ($340 vs $410), it's more stable (maximum load 17.64 lbs / 8.0 kg vs 15.4 lb / 7.0 kg), folds shorter (21.46" / 54.5 cm vs 24" / 61 cm) and opens taller (66.93" / 170 cm vs 63" / 160 cm). All of this for the negligible added weight of (0.15 lb / 100 gram).

Shared disadvantages of both: The column doesn't have a bottom hook to hang a bag for added stability, and features that other brands provide at this price are all extra - No retractable spikes, and no bag or strap.

I'm currently considering the 055CXPRO4 but haven't made up my mind yet. There are too many other tripods that are appealing and provide different tradeoffs. I would very much appreciate comments and suggestions in the thread that I opened here:


I was in the same boat as you, considering MF 055CXPRO4 among others. Settled eventually with an Induro CT214 and couldn't be happier.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2013 at 10:51 UTC
On article Homemade rig captures extreme macro shots of snowflakes (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paul Farace: I understand crystal growth mechanics, but still... to look at these and NOT believe in the hand of a creator!

"...i know why: because we are too proud to accept that there are things that we do not understand. believing is beneath us so to speak..."

Come again?

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2013 at 08:35 UTC
In reply to:

Pat Cullinan Jr: It was staged. Even the New York Times revealed this. Read, if you dare.

"It was staged..."

The article talks about speculation and doubt. You seem to know more than the historians and experts quoted in it.

Good for you, Junior.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2013 at 04:57 UTC

Not bad at all...

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2013 at 05:33 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

(unknown member): The 7r shots look significantly better.

You're seeing things...

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 03:04 UTC
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (621 comments in total)
In reply to:

cgarrard: Nice nails on the girls hand :).

What Barnaby does in privacy of his home is no one's concern.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 05:05 UTC
On article Sample gallery: Nokia Lumia 1020 (58 comments in total)
In reply to:

xlynx9: Anyone know what city these are taken in?

You're funny guy...

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 01:54 UTC
In reply to:

tonywong: Can't wait to see the reviews on this Dell 3007s are really long in the tooth.

They are, because there are new 30" DELL IPS monitor models that superseded 3007, like the 3011 and 3014.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2013 at 23:22 UTC
In reply to:

IrishhAndy: Shocking in its mediocrity. Cameras are getting really boring.

Maybe this will help convey the message that the photography isn't abot the camera...who cares anymore if it's 600, 650 or 700, it doesn't really matter.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 08:59 UTC

Has it been that long already? 9 months?

Canon is turning these low end EOSes into a joke. There will be certainly a good number of 650D owners who would feel a hard done by.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 08:57 UTC as 37th comment | 2 replies
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review (532 comments in total)
In reply to:

SiliconVoid: In recent years I have defended DPReview dozens of times across the internet regarding their integrity and analysis, specifically regarding their ability to assess a product on its own merits and across its designed capability range - instead of penalizing a product for what it lacks in a comparison. THEN I read this review.

If you add the D600 to the scoring module on page-25 you can see what is supposedly areas that would allow it to score differently (higher in this case) and it is interesting that the areas showing better performance are simply not substantiated in the pages of the 6D review. Not to mention areas of heated debate and comparison (the 6D's inferior 11-point AF system and Canon's tired old 63 metering zones) where even though DPR hops on the bandwagon to proclaim Canon's failings of the 6D their own testing shows that the 'lowly' 11-point AF and 'zone' metering system out perform the D600.

What the hell is that, does DPR write the reviews before or after testing??? should get out more.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2013 at 07:40 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review (532 comments in total)
In reply to:

Noogy: DPR can continue to lavish praises over the D600 and I don't care. They completely ignored the quality control issues in the process, yet felt it was ok to give it a gold rating. Come on guys! But then again that's the reason I proceeded to buy the 6D way before this review came out, because DPR ceases to be the benchmark on camera reviews that it used to be.

Noggy...buyer's remorse can be a real b$tch sometimes.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 17:26 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review (532 comments in total)
In reply to:

tedwill48167: The lack of a built in flash is a show stopper for me. As a consumer focused camera it's a very strange design decision not to include it. obviously never heard of a fill-flash, which many of us use.
What an unintelligent generalization.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 06:12 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review (532 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Does the D600 really have more "features" than the 6D? I thought the wifi deal was really cool.

thx1138...where is this "real world feedback" you're referring to?
Do tell.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 06:04 UTC

Ahh the grain...the hi-contrast and it!

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2013 at 20:25 UTC as 77th comment
In reply to:

Nigel Ward 2: Camera World are already taking orders on the new 18-35mm lens for £669 !
That's SIX HUNDRED AND SEVENTY POUNDS for an f/4.5 at 35mm lens!

The world has gone mad.

The problem is that with recent advancement in digi cams the f/4 is becoming now the "new" f/2.8. So expect many more lens products built around the ~ f/4 aperture and costing a pretty penny.

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2013 at 18:05 UTC
Total: 65, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »