malabito

malabito

Lives in Romania Bucharest, Romania
Works as a Healthcare IT Specialist
Joined on Dec 15, 2007
About me:

http://ailukewitsch.wordpress.com/
http://www.ilukewitsch.com/
http://www.flickr.com/malabito
http://500px.com/AlejandroI
http://twitter.com/AIlukewitsch

Comments

Total: 106, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

This is not what I will call portable, for that size just better bring a full frame Sony better image quality and with the zeiss 55mm similar size.

If not why just not bring the Olympus 12mm 2.0 and Panasonic 25mm 1.4, price of the lenses combined will have been around same price and give you a wider reach on a small size :)

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2017 at 06:38 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Deardorff: Long way to go before they even begin to match what Fuji has.

It's funny how people complain and complain about cameras and equipment but have nothing to show in exchange. No galleries, no posts, no links to websites or blogs :)

If you think fujis are better good for you :) indeed buying a leica might be silly and stupid considering the price, but after you use one you will really understand what is all about. and if you are talking about image quality the m240 kills the fujis, at least all fujis xt1 and below, can no tell about v2 since I never use one long enough. I have a Fuji x70 which she really like and found amazing for the size, but the m and q, Ian just so much better in all aspects except size.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2017 at 11:50 UTC
In reply to:

Deardorff: Long way to go before they even begin to match what Fuji has.

Dream on :) I have both, and still Fuji has a long way to match leica :)

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 05:32 UTC
On article DJI reportedly takes majority stake in Hasselblad (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

PhotoUniverse: I am sure some people will not X1D because of this.

Yep I was go to buy 3, one for each family member, but now that they are going to be built in China I will save the money :)

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 08:06 UTC

I also have one of these. It's great to break up the ice when doing street portraits. People love having their pictures given to them right away. Actually I only use it that way, when shooting on the streets and having to approach subjects that are not verybfund of their pictures been taken :)

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2016 at 13:50 UTC as 30th comment
On article TIME releases 100 most influential images of all time (165 comments in total)
In reply to:

alcaher: Poverty, war, tragedy, portraits, selfies etc thats the common denominator in these photos. Showing all those pictures the magazine is going to make alot of money

What's there else to show? Flowers and cats? It's life, it's mostly full of tragedies... get use to it and enjoy the ride:)

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2016 at 06:48 UTC
On article Got Reach? Tamron SP 150-600mm F5-6.3 G2 sample gallery (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: Clever marketing or good timing having the post before this one wildlife photographer of the year....

Don't forget to wear the tin hat :)

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 17:36 UTC
In reply to:

ekaton: Many comments on price. But if this Leica is overpriced, then so is the Sony RX1rII. Except for the sensor the Q is so much more camera than the Sony in any respect.

@S YU I used both and have a Q. Yes the Sony may have better quality if shot in a tripod or at much higher isos, but for the rest the Leica q is much better. Faster, handles much better, focus is much faster, manual focus is miles ahead, camera is much more responsive, battery life, color pallete, etc, etc... yes Sony might have better image quality but a camera is not only the sensor, is a great part of it but not all, and the Leica has quite good image quality and on the rest is way better then the Sony.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2016 at 04:37 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2188 comments in total)

So what was all the fuss with focus tracking? Wasn't it ready for prime time ? :)

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2016 at 16:48 UTC as 174th comment
In reply to:

Najinsky: Absolutely beautiful 'optical' rendering properties, but it looks like it needs a totally different color response profile (aka tone curves) before it can be appreciated in beautiful colour too.

These colors just don't work for me. Looks a lot closer to an old dead skin vacated by a chameleon, than its current one.

Color is supposed to give off an energy. These are lethargic. Wait, stop the press, maybe this is the dark energy everyone is looking for.

Magnar W thanks for the kind words!

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2016 at 23:52 UTC
In reply to:

Najinsky: Absolutely beautiful 'optical' rendering properties, but it looks like it needs a totally different color response profile (aka tone curves) before it can be appreciated in beautiful colour too.

These colors just don't work for me. Looks a lot closer to an old dead skin vacated by a chameleon, than its current one.

Color is supposed to give off an energy. These are lethargic. Wait, stop the press, maybe this is the dark energy everyone is looking for.

That's what got me out of sony, (and the battery power). I never was satisfied completely with the colors, no matter how much I tired :(

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2016 at 19:27 UTC
In reply to:

kobakokh: I used Leica M9 last month during the few days. Extraordinary bad sensor, DR is about 5! Lenses are great, I used Trielmar 16-18-21, also 90mm and 50mm, really great lenses, if people will use them with Sony A7 series cameras, they will be surprised. But Leica must change not color of cameras, but SENSOR!!!!!!

I think flruckas concern is that he couldn't shoot cats with the m9, people love to complain about dynamic range and image quality and having absolutely the best when usually they use half of it :) photography is suppose to be fun unless it's your main source of input, and in that case shooting a Fuji is as silly as shooting a Leica :) and I shoot both.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2016 at 17:18 UTC
In reply to:

kobakokh: I used Leica M9 last month during the few days. Extraordinary bad sensor, DR is about 5! Lenses are great, I used Trielmar 16-18-21, also 90mm and 50mm, really great lenses, if people will use them with Sony A7 series cameras, they will be surprised. But Leica must change not color of cameras, but SENSOR!!!!!!

@FLruckas, by the way, not sure about the xt2, but i can tell you the m240 its way better then the xt1, (dynamic range, iso, colors, etc....).

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2016 at 08:48 UTC
In reply to:

kobakokh: I used Leica M9 last month during the few days. Extraordinary bad sensor, DR is about 5! Lenses are great, I used Trielmar 16-18-21, also 90mm and 50mm, really great lenses, if people will use them with Sony A7 series cameras, they will be surprised. But Leica must change not color of cameras, but SENSOR!!!!!!

@FLruckas cameras are not only about dynamic range or image quality its the sums of its parts, its about compromises. If it was purely image quality, yes the Fuji will be nice, but far from the best, not even close to nikon d810 or a sony a7r2, actually not even close to a nikon d750, which can be found for about the same price of the xt2, so why people still by the fuji? If the nikon has better sensor, in regards to all aspects, better focus capabilities, and better accessories, (as in flash system). Its also about the shooting experience, I shot nikon, sony and fuji, and still prefer the leica over the other systems, its because of the shooting experience. IF i were to select an equipment mainly because of image quality it will be the sony :) But as many i choose with what gives me the best image and shooting satisfaction. And thats why many buy the fuji as well. If you are buying the fuji because image quality then you might be a bit blind :)

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2016 at 08:47 UTC
On a photo in the Sony FE 70-200 F2.8 GM OSS at Roller Derby Playoffs sample gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

panzini: Mostly overexposed and ISO way too high

Mind sharing your optimal settings?

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 18:50 UTC
On article SanDisk 1TB SDXC card prototype unveiled at Photokina (109 comments in total)

I wouldn't trust putting all my images on a 1tb card, but imagine using these as a backup solution when traveling. 2 of these or even 3, minimum space, just copy your images to these babies, and forget about hardrives loosing data because of movable parts or needing to carry huge backup solutions.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 09:24 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

nicolaiecostel: Forgot this thing existed. Any users ?

@mikael I guess dentists and pros as well :) Beatiful images in your site.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 07:52 UTC

Amazing images, probably all done with Fuji equipment :)

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2016 at 18:12 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply

I don't understand the criticism. This is an amazing camera for the price. Buy it with the 35mm 1.8 DX lens and you have a great machine for street and carrying around. 24mp and no Olpf. I had many expensive cameras, and never used most of the items the functionalities they come with. I just want aperture priority, auto iso, and manual functions. If you want more things pay more :)

The question I have is how reliable these cameras are.

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2016 at 10:07 UTC as 76th comment | 10 replies
On article A photographer's guide to Cuba (46 comments in total)

Best advice? Bring money, with the exception of the casas particulares the rest is very expensive and lacking quality....

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2016 at 13:32 UTC as 22nd comment
Total: 106, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »