Rich Rosen

I am glad to hear that! But any camera company that doesn't have as its goal, to be number one in the industry,  shouldn't be in the industry. Imagine the marketing for a camera company that says ...

The first week that I own a new camera, it is revered, idolized, and played with. I guess that qualifies it as a toy. The second week its experimented with, studied; its manuals are read in more ...

I got a Really Right Stuff MPR113 Lens plate. It goes for $55, which is a little more expensive than the lens foot you have bought. I attached it two years ago to original foot and haven't had an ...

If you are considering the D850, but find the cost a little high; why aren't you considering a D810 over the D750, or Df? Its a good..no very good camera. It doesn't have as many pixels as the ...

Only handled mirrorless at photo shows and in stores. Not enough to really make an informed opinion. I’ve handled an A9, and A7rii. User interface so-so, compared to Nikon. EVF ok, and it not ...

Well; according to all the "pundits" the cameras that the F mounts are attached to, will be gone in ten to fifteen years anyhow. So why create a DSLR with a Z type (emphasis on "type") mount, when ...

Traditionally, it was desirable to have two of the exact same body, with different lenses attached for different perspectives, or to have a backup in case of issues with the first. That way the ...

I miss my D3. Sold it to finance my D810. It will handle low light situations much better than your DX cameras. Its focusing is  faster than the D7000 and is better at tracking an erratic moving ...

Comment on this  thread: Quite a few are saying, not only will they not replace their DSLR's with a Z, but that they're not even going to buy a Z. Granted, its a small unscientific sample, but ...

If I could afford a D4 or 5,  I would. But I did buy a D500 because of its AF and its speed. I am not being disingenuous in my reasons for not jumping on Nikon's first mirrorless entry. It doesn't ...

That's all I'm saying Bob. Thanks

The D810 is pretty responsive. I used it for a year shooting sports. But compared to the D5, the D500, and the D850 (maybe); its yesteryears technology. If the Z is  only as responsive as the ...

Bob, I’m not totally convinced, that CanNikon produced the best mirrorless they could produce. Both have had experience with mirrorless at some level; yet Nikon failed to put a responsive AF ...

You're right of course... except maybe not. Mirrorless will be the future and its potential is very high. But that doesn't mean we should rush out and buy today's mirrorless, and sell all our ...

When I was ready to buy the D800/E, there were reported issues with its focusing which warned me off the purchase. However, when the D810 came out, I was one of the first to order it. There isn't ...

I have.

This only confirms,s my decision not to buy the Z7. Quite frankly, I am disappointed, because I want a "Zed" for its weight and technology. But one of the most important features for me is a ...

Based on this test, which I'm sure has its flaws, this is not a camera for what I do now, which is tracking lacrosse players as they move up the field. In the second sequence of the biker, he is ...

I made my decision today. It has nothing to do with the second card slot. I am very disappointed in the AF system, and its inability to continually focus on a moving subject, and its low light ...

As I get older, I find myself looking at smaller, lighter as very attractive features; especially if the feature set is comparable to the high end DSLRs like the D850, D500. But that only takes ...