AkashRana

One of my friends had a similar experience from 70400G1 to G2. There wasn't a difference in sharpness between two but the focusing speeds alone made him make the switch, which if you play around a ...

I have 70-400G1 and a close friend shoots 50-500 on Canon, so had a chance to compare them side by side with A68 and Canon 80D bodies. 50-500 is a very good lens on its own though 70-400 is ...

As I see it there shouldn't be difference in the noise between APS-C mode and full frame mode as effective pixel pitch is same and as long as the other parameters like ISO, f-stop and shutter ...

I would say the cheapest option to keep on using your current gear would be A68. As you have seemed to be content with A700 all theses years, A68 would do everything A700 does and more. A99ii is ...

Camera will just focus on the area with best contrast, or on the nearest object. Without pressing the Eye-AF button, the priority just changes to Face-AF if its turned on, which otherwise will ...

In my experience, press the dedicated button to focus on eye and if the camera is in AF-C then while the button is pressed it will keep on tracking the eye. But all of this requires one to press ...

You will need to fine tune AF on A99ii body just like any DSLR as the main AF sensor sits separately. This dedicated AF sensor works in conjunction with on-sensor AF points. As for Eye-AF, it works ...

I am in a self implicated dilemma and might be suffering with case of GAS here. Its just that say I came across this used A99ii in great condition for about $800 as there are not many takers of ...

Not sure which gen Sigma 50-500 you have, but if its the latest one with image stabilization, its should do a good job at f8, if AF micro adjustments are done. Sony 70-400 is an excellent lens and ...

So I have come across a used A99ii for a very good price. Its very clean and looks like been used carefully. The body has been primarily used for shooting videos as the shutter count on it is just ...

I have had the same dilemma when it came to buying A99ii a few months back. I did have A99 as an option as it definitely offered better low light performance when compared to A68, but did loose on ...

I would like to 2nd that. Its a brilliant lens and works fast. One of the best APS-C lens hands down. And it works well for videos as well.

I would say make this decision on basis of how invested are you on A-mount. A77ii is definitely a major improvement over mark1 which everyone has listed in ample detail. But if you don't have ...

I would say looking at the read noise chart reveals ISO behavior better for 61MP sensor. Dual gain is applied to A7Riv at 2/3rd stops of ISO earlier than A99ii. It looks like half a stop noise is ...

At lower ISOs A7Riv will definitely outperform A99ii in terms of details that 61MP sensor produces.  But as you start pushing ISO up A7Riv is about half a stop behind A99ii sensor in terms of ...

Thanks. This gives an idea on what to expect.

I have a question in terms of how degraded the image is with 300mm and 2x tete-converter. Say a scaled up 70-400 to 600mm vs 300+2x vs 300+1.4x scaled up to 600mm, how would you rate the 3? Minolta ...

So far what I have learned about Tamron 150-600 is that its good when one can fill the frame, but if intentions are to crop at 600mm this lens lacks resolution for it. How would you rate your ...

Another update, just now got the Sony 24-70 ZA and loving it the short time I have had so far with it. It resolves extraordinary details and hands down one of the best from Sony. Once again thanks ...

I would say they Sony shows some love to APS-C and gives us A77iii first. A99ii has got plenty good to it, so A99iii could wait a little more