markusw

So, maybe the 23 1.4 would be a good „in-between“ prime for you? Can serve as a one-cam-one-lens kit as well.

Good choice, love the 35 even for cityscapes! However, I would draft my entire lens kit first, to avoid overlaps at the end. If you want to go for a 50/56 as well, I would probably avoid the 35, ...

Well done!

If the 55 is used on the IQ250, there is no exact match (40mm) > take the 35mm.

Ok... I did my maths... IQ250 translates to 22/40/71mm - its a crop MF sensor :) XF is 18/32/58mm

It depends on the sensor size. The IQ250 has 44 x 33 mm, the 100MP XF 53.7×40.4mm. Do you know which camera model he is using?

Approximately... the Schneider-Kreuznach 55mm has a picture angle of 64°, the Sony Zeiss Distagon 35 f1.4 (FF) has 63°.

No idea if I am doing right, but I use two SD cards in the Xpro2 - one for RAW, one for JPG.

...means 18/35/55, approx.

Face/Eye makes no sense with AF-S in my understanding (does it work at all?!). In all other cases, I use back button focusing, so I don‘t care at all :)

OK, you got me :) For my corporate blogging work, I shoot small JPGs, actually. Enough for posting on LinkedIn! However, on travel, I edit the RAW files on the iPad Pro. But this workflow is not ...

...the 18 f2. Small money, small size, also f2. The FoV will help indoor a lot! On the long side, 35 is fine for me as long as you do not do head portraits.

I am too lazy or too engaged in the field to get perfect JPGs. If they are, I do not need to edit them at all :) However, shooting RAW gives me the option to focus myself on composition instead of ...

Why not? It's sharp and has WR. You may check this review, they have a couple of landscape shots included: https://www.thephoblographer.com/2018/03/20/review-fujifilm-80mm-f2-8-r-lm-ois-wr-macro/

Hm, I bought a camera for its 14 bit color depth, and then go with the JPGs only? Not for me :) My workflow in LR: I apply the approbiate camera profile first (most times the Astia simulation), and ...

I have my X-Pro2 on many business trips with me as well, but usually with just one single prime (14 or 18mm).

Sounds like a plan :) Go for it!

From your list, I would get the 60mm for portraits and as a nice short tele. However, if you consider other options as well, you may take something wider into account. My choice would be the 18mm ...

If you are looking for a more compact kit than the A7/L, I would go with the 18 (which is better than its reputation) and the other f2‘s, e.g. 35mm f2.

But gear has no value by itself, it has to support photography! I enjoy discussions how my pictures can be improved with this lens or that technique. But too often we forget why we are discussing...