David Naylor

God I wish they would fix this...

Interesting that DPReview calls these lenses tiny when their size (in combination with lack of a bright aperture) is exactly what makes them completely uninteresting to me.

Huh. This doesn't sound right. (Literally.) I hope Sony are able to fix it with a firmware update.

Now that the a7 iii and a7r iii have had firmware 3.0  for a while, I'm curious to hear how people have chosen to set up their eye AF. Do you have it always on (when shooting portraits) or do you ...

I have the Sigma 35/1.4 and I'm definitely switching for the smaller size. The loss of speed is negligible in comparison to the reduction in size and weight. Image quality is supposedly superb so ...

I'm about to start using negative lab pro to convert our old colour negatives. It has great reviews on YouTube.

Considering how Sony's cameras are making everyone else look like yesterday's news right now, everyone must be biased towards Sony.

Just wait until the A6100 and A6600 are released =)

Which would I choose? Neither. The Canon Cripple Hammer reigns supreme.

Exciting times! Can't wait to see what they put into it.

I thought the bokeh in these photos looked absolutely brilliant.

This collection of photos alone has me convinced to sell my sigma 35 art and buy this lens instead.

Sony eye AF <3

Oh yeah this is the real thing. Want to trade my fat sigma 35/1.4 for this.

Another vote for a 35 or 40mm f/1.8. I would probably sell my sigma 35/1.4. The 55/1.8 and the 85/1.8 have got me hooked on light, small, high quality primes.

What does focus settings actually do when not in MF?

Looks very promising! Definitely considering getting this one. Although it would sit between my 35/1.4 and my 55/1.8 which is quite a tight space. But we can't have too many lenses right?