sebiruns

Probably the best m43 lens I owned while I was using the system. Very nice rendering, very good built quality and the price is not too high at all. Everybody knows the price goes up exponentially...

I mostly use my Fuji to photograph my kids. But we will be vacationing in the mountains later this month. So Once I am back I will make sure to share some photos. Currently I am looking at photo ...

https://tedclutterphotography.smugmug.com/Idaho/ Pretty impressive. It is the photographer, not the gear.

I shot with both m43 and Fuji as well and I believe that the so called landscape photography "problem" is way overstated. As for your examples. Here are some photos of landscapes by a street ...

80mm is supposed to come out in 2017. That seems a reasonable time to wait. The question remains how much it will cost. A lot I fear.

You're welcome. Still using the Ona Bowery after almost three years. I won't get another until it falls apart. With its built that will most likely be far into the future.

No. ILC and a pancake are not jeans pocketable. This coild be as part of the lens can retract inside the body. Weathersealing wouldn't be possible though. Once a lens retracts and is supposed to ...

I fear you are correct.

True. Maybe a f1.0 or f1.2 (not equivalent) is rather possible. The price and weight could also go too high, if f0.x was the target.

fixed focal length 1-inch sensor camera. I would really enjoy a 35mm equivalent f1.4 or f1.8 version of the rx100. Possibly even thinner than current models so it would be truly pocketable. Could ...

Beautiful shot. But that isn't really a low light photo when you can shoot 1/80 at ISO 125. The OP was talking about higher ISOs and obviously the 1-inch sensor cannot keep up with an aps-c sized ...

Maybe show a couple of photos. I sold my X-T1 to get the X-T20 and I did not notice any of your observations. It is acctually sharper and nothing flickers. I would be suspicious.

To be honest, I cannot help you here. If you love to shoot zooms go for the 18-55 unless you really want that wider field of view. I went with the 18-55 which is brighter and which can mean faster ...

Thanks for the lengthy statement. Now I know the language problem was on my side. Or I just misread you. We are actually on the same page here. I agree with what you said. Well, except for that ...

To focus? It depends. In S-AF there isn't much of a difference. In C-Af the Fuji is much quicker following your subject. So for active kids I'd go with the Fuji. Contrast detact based af systems ...

Maybe it is a language problem. We are both not native speakers I presume. I really don't get the reasoning behind your principle.

Hi Maria, I tested the tracking and electronic shutter in bright sunlight today and must say both work really well and are perfectly usable when shooting wide open in bright lit areas. Here are a ...

In poor lighting the f1.4 version actually focuses faster. Only in good light the advantage of the f2 motor will really show.

Not sure that is comparable. I am an atheist with a master in math and a mba but your principle makes no sense to me. As someone else said: Sigma may just be testing the waters. If the adapted ...

Thanks for all the posts and thanks to the OP. I seriously think whoever complains about this lens has never used it and therefor cannot appreciate its immense value proposition.