KlaasK

Mid June, I will be at the Greek island Rhodes for a week, and will have some time to do some bird photography. Any suggestions where I could/should go?

To answer some questions raised: For birding I now mostly use the RF800. Handheld or monopod. The quality of the images is  good - at least satisfactory for me. However, there are two issues: Birds ...

One small advantage of the  RF 100-400: The extender would also fit on the RF800!

Actualy, I did also test the EF100-400 with the converter. But lens + converter + EF/RF rong make the lens quite heavy. Not only that. Also the balance in combination with the light body is not ...

This has probably been discussed before, but maybe there are new insights?? Owning an R5, I decided to replace my EF100-400 IS II, and indeed succeeded to sell it for a good price. So it is ...

I posted this question in another forum - perhaps the wrong one. So, another try: I have a CANON R and a selphy printer (CP910). I know how to print single pictures directly from camera. My ...

I have a CANON R and a selphy printer (CP910). I know how to print single pictures directly from camera. My question is: Can I also select multiple pictures in my camera, and then print them all ...

I have a CANON R and a selphy printer (CP910).  I know how to print single pictures directly from camera. My question is: Can I also select multiple pictures in my camera, and then print them all ...

Back home

As always very impressive pictures. Looking forward to your posts! At the same time the post raised a question. What is, do you have, any experience with the RF 100-500? I am struggling with the ...

Thanks for all the comments. Maybe the most time consuming was finding the right pages on internet for this calculations. Including the "angle of view" for the canon lenses, and a triangle ...

Today I made some calculations, but am not sure how to interpret them, and/or how to use them. I own a Canon RF800 mm and a EF100-400 mm, both used with my R5 body. The R5 sensor has 8192 pixels ...

This may be true, but quality and resolution are not the same thing, are they? I confess that I do shoot RAW, but I can only dream of making the same quality of pictures as birdshooter7

Thanks for the comments. The monopod was certainly a surprise solution!

I mostly do outdoor shooting. Wildlife, birding and landscapes. I have the RF800 and the EF100-400 _II+TC1.4 (also the RF24-105 and RF35). However, in comparison to the RF800 and my other lenses, ...

For one thing, The EF lens is quite heavy, and I notice that I am using it less and less recently (in favour of my RF800). And again, I was really curious if there would be a noticable difference ...

Hi R2D2, Thanks for your comment. But as said, I understand that the RF 100-500 mm is the better lens.. Ans for sure I can afford it. But then I could also afford the RF100-400 plus the RF100 ...

Having read several threads about the 100-400/500 mm options for the canon R5 I wanted to raise a totally different question. I have difficulties choosing between the three options (RF 100-400, RF ...

Scrolling through this thread as a real novice, one thing came to mind. I see a lot of replies discussing the loss of pixels. However, I would be more "concerned" with the loss of mm. To me it ...

Well..... Some of the older people may remember the quote of the comedian Victor Borge. He once said that  Pharmaceutical companies are so good that they invented a cure for which there was not ...