Mirrorless _ user

Joined on Jul 30, 2013

Comments

Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12

1- What happen with Nikon D600 / D610 ??? The first cheap Full Frame DSLR ????? OMG !!
2- Sony A6000 was a revolution too !!!! Champion of sales because is that good for so little !!!
3- A7 III a full frame camera that have so much for their ask price, another lost Champion !!!

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2019 at 22:27 UTC as 55th comment
On article Sony Europe introduces a68 SLT with 79-point AF module (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

Donnie G: How many Sony fans really want an inexpensive legacy Sony/Minolta A-mount camera body complete with Sony sensor, EVF, articulated rear screen, and non-reflex (non-moving) mirror assembly? Or to put it another way, how many Sony fans are actually going to buy this new Sony a68 SLT camera, or any Sony SLT camera for that matter? Sony has listened to your cries for an affordable A-mount body which you claim will go a long way toward keeping the A-mount system alive. Well, now it's your turn to show how committed you really are to the A-mount by putting your money where your mouthes are, because without strong SLT sales the A-mount is a dead duck. It's time for you to put up or shut up. :))

OK, BUT I feel that is more important AutoFocus Microadjustment that...... a Top LCD display.... Is more important a SHARP, In Focus Photo (otherwise the photo isn't useful at all) that the possibility of read information in the top of the camera..... It is quite understandable. Without AF Micro Adjustment the camera is not "Complete", even touches the futility more times than one can believe. Think, it is truly a camera for enthusiasts who buy quick lenses

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2015 at 22:52 UTC
On article Sony Europe introduces a68 SLT with 79-point AF module (304 comments in total)

Anyone know if the A68 have AF microadjustment ? In the mirrorles cameras era, that is a must. Because the mirrorless are very accurate in the AF department, I feel that there aren't room for DSLR / DSLT that haven't AF microadjustment. And a sharp photo is because an accurate AF, otherwise the camera isn't usefull. Is VERY IMPORTANT AF microadjustment.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2015 at 22:15 UTC as 15th comment
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)
In reply to:

dw2001: love these focus tracking test where you shoot at like F22 and absolutely everything in the frame is in focus...that really gives you an idea of how the focus tracking performs....

YES dw2001, all we think that YOU are REALLY "inteligent"........................... :) :) :))))

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2013 at 20:16 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)

By far this is the best m43 camera for shots. Solved the great problem of continuous AF. OK its CAF it is not 10 point, BUT it sure is 8.5 or 9 . Good for the 1º m43 camera with a usable CAF. Keep going Oly !!

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2013 at 19:39 UTC as 286th comment | 1 reply
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)
In reply to:

dw2001: love these focus tracking test where you shoot at like F22 and absolutely everything in the frame is in focus...that really gives you an idea of how the focus tracking performs....

jajaj ... dw2001 we did not know that you were so so so so so "intelligent" jajajajajajajajjajajaj aaaaaaaaa ajajajjajajajaj !!!

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2013 at 19:32 UTC
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (626 comments in total)
In reply to:

Alexis D: This is the camera for those who just want to look the part. They want to buy a DSLR looking camera cheap. It will no doubt sell well, if the buying trend in US is any guide. They will just look at the price, OK, $400 with a zoom lens, and also look at the 20MP and they buy.

If Canon is the one making this camera, it will sell even faster. Such is the mentality of the average camera buyers. Sad but true. So, Sony said, if this is what you want, this is what we will give you.

Well, if you tell the true, good, tell me the model with a viewfinder. I have a G5 and it have a micro 4/3 sensor. I know that the A3000 will be better in low light and high ISO and will have Better dinamic range, so the G5 is not. It just have a good SINGLE AF. And now is in $ 400, because is an 1 year old camera. In 1 year the A3000 will sell for $ 300 / $ 325, so, neither they are comparable for the same money.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2013 at 22:01 UTC
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (626 comments in total)
In reply to:

Alexis D: This is the camera for those who just want to look the part. They want to buy a DSLR looking camera cheap. It will no doubt sell well, if the buying trend in US is any guide. They will just look at the price, OK, $400 with a zoom lens, and also look at the 20MP and they buy.

If Canon is the one making this camera, it will sell even faster. Such is the mentality of the average camera buyers. Sad but true. So, Sony said, if this is what you want, this is what we will give you.

Is simple. This is an alternative for a consumer that will spend $ 400 in a camera with a viewfinder that take GOOD pictures.
There are other cameras that cost $ 800 or more, that have more features, is OK. The people choice. Don't get angry for that.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2013 at 02:21 UTC
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (626 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirrorless _ user: I DONT UNDERSTAND. What I see is a cheap chance to get a camera that take GOOD pictures. NOT ?
I start taking photographs with a used Panasonic G10, and it was at no point the best camera (distant of that) but I was fun taking my first shots of my baby and learning in the process. Now I have a G5, that is a good camera, but (like all cameras) have low points (SLOW and inaccurate continuos AF, not superb in low light or super high Iso.. just to say some) Again, it's a good camera, but I not paid a fortune for it, just $400 one month ago.
I applaud SONY for give us a chance to get a cheap camera WITH A VIEWFINDER that take VERY GOOD pictures, even better than many other more expensive cameras !!!!!!!!
NOT all the cameras have that it will be expensive !!!!!!
SUPERB !!!!!!!!!

I guess this camera take good pictures, no ?
I ask respectfully, WHO is the ignorant, or by the way THE SHEEP ?

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 21:51 UTC
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (626 comments in total)

I DONT UNDERSTAND. What I see is a cheap chance to get a camera that take GOOD pictures. NOT ?
I start taking photographs with a used Panasonic G10, and it was at no point the best camera (distant of that) but I was fun taking my first shots of my baby and learning in the process. Now I have a G5, that is a good camera, but (like all cameras) have low points (SLOW and inaccurate continuos AF, not superb in low light or super high Iso.. just to say some) Again, it's a good camera, but I not paid a fortune for it, just $400 one month ago.
I applaud SONY for give us a chance to get a cheap camera WITH A VIEWFINDER that take VERY GOOD pictures, even better than many other more expensive cameras !!!!!!!!
NOT all the cameras have that it will be expensive !!!!!!
SUPERB !!!!!!!!!

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 23:47 UTC as 62nd comment | 8 replies
On article Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review (1198 comments in total)

BUG = NOT actualizing the images of all cameras when switching to "Low light"

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2013 at 15:07 UTC as 116th comment | 2 replies
On article Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review (1198 comments in total)

Where is the " GO TO FULL SCREEN MODE " button ?????

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2013 at 15:03 UTC as 117th comment | 2 replies
Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12