D135ima

It is TTartisan, not Sigma. These guys make simple primes without electronic connection to the camera. This lens is a huge step for them. And I am very happy for them.

There are some concerns about 16 2.8. Something is wrong, something doesn't fit.

I want this WB thing in my R6. Setting WB on field by photo from galery is quite strange, especially for video. This is some piece of legacy from early "before live view" DSLR era.
And it seems to...

Unique lens. These pictures have some old-fashioned character, but the truth is that even 35 1.4 were very rare. I'ts like this laowa refers to some non-existent classical lens. Very exited about...

Canon RF lenses now so expensive !
Ок, i get it - this is not just some 16-35 4. This is 14-35 4, it small and lightweight, with great magnification, and with awesome stabilization if you use it on...

I love my EF 24-105 4-5.6 stm for video on R6. You can expect different things from title "STM" on the lens, but on 24-105 4-5.6 it's definitely the "good" variation of this mechanism. Very fast ...

Is this Cosina make these camera ? I think some digital Ikon or Bessa would be a more organic and logical way for them.To be honest, a conspiracy theory arises in my head that Cosina have some kind...

There is pentax 800 4 for 67 system. If I'm not mistaken there was a manual cocking diaphragm.

Sooo what kind of LUT should be used for this c-log 3 in R6 ? I downloaded that folder from the official site, but there is just a bunch of stuff there, without any explanation.

Oly is one stop brighter in equivalency terms, and it philosophy is different. It's like "how good, expensive and professional we can make lens from middleweight class ?". Canon 600/11 is more like...

This lens is not impressive in terms of "telescopic power". It has only 55mm aperture on 600mm, but it makes some sense if you desire this ultrazoom-like long end on you mirrorless body. 55mm on...

My biggest problem with Canon is fact that their lens line is highly polarized. Sometimes from cheapest of L lenses and from greatest non L lenses something like the middle line of lenses looms...

I think EF 16-35 f/4 is still most well balanced canon ultrawide zoom. It doesn't brakes any sharpness records, but it decent and has understandable vignetting and other distortions.

77mm on 14mm with f/4 - i feel some of 15-35 2.8 level of vignetting, or maybe even worse.

I like that Panasonic decided to make line of balanced 1.8 lenses. Nikon invented this formula on DSLRs and i like it. It seems like only my lovely Canon haven't supported this idea yet. They have...

Because it's design much closer to Nikon Z 50 1.8 or sony zeiss 55 1.8 than to traditional design fifties like canon 50 1.8 stm. It's like two different lens classes, even with fact that focal...

TheRealYeats Even for a $500 this is just soft lens. It reminds me 15 f/4 and 21 3.2 - when these lenses appeared, they were looks not bad, because no one really tried to make good lenses for...

Small, cute, but very far from squeezing all the juices from the aps-c sensor.

This is at least half of the price for a typical Leica lens of this class. Almost fair price for Japanese brand lens. And it's not a rebranding of Panasonic pro lens. Something is wrong here.

40mm is pretty new lens, and it feels like 40mm and 28 profess a different concept than 35. Sigma was made this 40 mm not only to fill this small gap in focal length, but also to make a super sharp...