D135ima

Close focus ability is not free for lens design. Even 1:2.

Great lens for me. Portraits and subject photography on one lens. Bargain ! But I will become very happy, when Canon begins to make sealing in the non L lenses.

10 cents per single and also for subscribe. This is something new. I really don't understand whats going on. This is not 30%. Its something else.

OrpheusXx
Sorry, its not great news to me, and sometimes it just hard to choose words on english (Especially when you studied it mainly on pirated video games on ps1). I mean there is a large...

Одиночкам и так сложно пробиваться в конкуренции через конвеерные студии, а тут такое.

Nikon have great 300 4 with similar price and even more compact. Or 80-400, or 200-500 5.6. Lens in article is 107 mm aperture monster, just another class.

Crazy Nikon ultrazooms is favorite devices of flatearthers. Their favorite pastime is to look at the horizon at the long end of the zoom and say that those objects that they can observe, would be...

Despite advances in technology and different sensor, I caught nostalgic memories by looking at jpegs from the gallery. Really this pictures looks more like good old "compact camera photos", than...

$4000 cheaper than original S2. Dumping made by pentax and then fuji had some effect even on the Leica.
By the way, this is the only fully digital DSLR MF system without any film background. I...

I like back wheel, but overal it is definitely not 5d/7d control logic camera. It seems that canon wants us to get used to operating with a touch screen.
Of course 5d/7d one-hand control...

Such a lens on m4/3 would be presented as an ultimate professional solution))). And it would be worth slightly under $1000. To be honest, Olympus would have make it in a solid metal case with...

I use my 24-105 3.5-5.6 stm like studio/landscape f8-f11 lens and it works fine for this cases. This lens is also can be great (not fact ofcourse). And mft distance is very helpful for studio...

IBIS in canon is realy gift. You know what that mean ? You can put on camera 70-200 2.8 non IS or even "Magic Drain pipe" and get in general, the actual lens, exept weather sealing. Also 200 2.8...

100-500 4.5-7.1 - is not really right answer to all this trendy 200-500 5.6 and 200-600 6.3 lenses. The point of this lenses, that they can give some piece of BIG telephoto world for not so big...

There is a feeling that the one digit department lives its own life and has no connection with other Nikon engineers. Okay - maybe this camera doesn't have on-sensor PDAF because they afraid some...

So basicly they have 3 almoust identical bodies now, which differ mainly by software features.

I don't expect wonders. There is no need many wonders to make slightly better lens than RF 24-240 :)

What problems you have with AF in these cameras ?

@Niko Todd and what speed can be reach with older lenses with mechanical aperture ?

It should be better than canon 24-240 if nikon still have some passion to compete. They had time, they could look and say "canon screwed up, but we will do better".