Smallpox

Nobody knows, least of all DPR... :-(

Love the 4:3 format. But lack of new sensor tech for years leads to underpar performance vs state of art 1" sensors. Not to mention top camera phones...

Sony owned Oly... so why no high-tech M43 sensor like their 1"?

M43 weren't making their own sensors and Sony wasn't either... so doomed to irrelevance.

Huh? Publishers want impactful pictures. They couldn't care less about the focal length.

Please play the last post

Weird that Pany often seems clueless. Why don't their fossilized managers listen to us... haha? It may seem expensive, but the screen and EVF are (nearly) class leading...

Agree with you. This is like carrying a 28mm FF IQ camera in your pocket. Some phones might get close (and certainly provide direct pleasing processed images), but the XF10 is special. Have made ...

Love it! Black on black... only too bad for the reins, maybe?

Can't say you rushed this pre-review

Thx for that! Looks like the Sony is doing a huge amount of correction & processing at its extreme range to obtain a good image. Your little Casio is only halfway in its range (450 + 900mm). Weird ...

Got rid of the LX100 mucho presto. Only average IQ. And AF was often slightly wrong.

Yes, thanks for the work!

Well yeah, with the TZ200, QC is a lottery :-(

Any reason to prefer this to your G1XIII?

You have talent, which counts more than pixels....

Can't understand why only Canon doesn't show full shooting info on its cameras ie aperture and speed....

Am tempted to try the TZ200. On German sites, daylight & low light images are as good or better than the Canon G1XIII

You hit the nail on the head. Not only concerning the TZ100/200, but also the RX100Vi, I found my small sensor travel zooms to be better at the long end (from 300mm to 900mm) and lighter in the ...

Indeed, as an old school photographer I am used to needing and seeing vital shooting info at all times in P, A or S mode, as on my Fuji or Pany. Can't understand why Canon doesn't and nobody ...