-
I have the 50mm 1.8G on the FTZ adapter and it's fine, perhaps even very good. But I've been getting more and more into primes, and since the 50 1.8 S is so well reviewed, I'll probably try to get ...
-
I had the 16-50mm for going small and light on my Z6, but I didn't love the megapixels I was losing. I've since moved to the 24-50 and it's nearly as small of a package but the advantage is I'm ...
-
Another remaining question is metal vs plastic mounts. I’ll buy them either way, but I’m hoping for metal.
-
It was within the poll he posted at his zsystemuser site. See https://www.zsystemuser.com/nikon-z-system-news-and/what-lenses-do-your-really.html and click the link to vote on the roadmap Nikkors. ...
-
From the silhouettes on the roadmap, it looks like they'll be about the size of the 24-50 when it's collapsed, which is small enough for me. And someone (maybe Thom Hogan) recently speculated that ...
-
The 28 and 40mm compacts are next. I will own both of them.
-
If you land on an 85mm prime, I wouldn't overlook the new Viltrox 85mm f/1.8. I've been impressed with mine so far. Granted, I shoot that focal length only occasionally, and if I were focused on ...
-
Wow, this is an incredible result. Very nicely done.
-
I’ve been using the 24-50 on the Z6 and have been pretty pleased with the lens, for what it is. For me, the small size and light weight are big pluses, making my camera a nice grab and go option ...
-
Oh, and even though I decided the DX lenses weren't for me, I did find this pro's opinion to be an interesting and well reasoned take on the matter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPGynC1FoJ0 Mono ...
-
I had the 16-50 for an occasional compact option and I did love how small and light it was, but I didn't love losing the pixels. It's entirely usable and doable, but I think the lens would be much ...
-
I've always leaned toward 35, 50, 85, but I'm realizing that on F-mount I had a 50 simply because it was inexpensive and small. So now I'm mostly a 35 and 85 shooter, but I'm considering moving to ...
-
Which is interesting, because when I was on F mount the Nikon F/1.8 primes were pretty small and light, and relatively inexpensive, whereas the Sigma primes were huge, heavy and pricier. Granted, ...
-
Oh, and they're starting to show up on eBay for in the low $300s (vs the $399 retail price) if that helps.
-
It's a pretty nice little lens. I have the 24-70mm f/4 and love it, but I wanted a smaller and lighter alternative for hiking and for just walking around downtown less conspicuously. I did first ...
-
I think the 28 and 40mm lenses will be the next releases, and I envision I'll get them both. For me, the interim solution has been the 24-50, which I've actually been pretty pleased with. It ...
-
I think the compact primes will be next, followed by the 24-105. I also believe we may see the announcement of a 70-300 priced and aimed at a wider audience than the existing 70-200 f/2.8.
-
I have a lot of respect for that site and their reviews, and that certainly had an influence in my purchase. And beyond the reviews, they have such a broad range of info and tutorials about all ...
-
I love mine. I was initially put off by how big it appeared to be, but once in hand it's a smaller than I imagined, plus it's not terribly heavy. More importantly, it's just a nice and sharp lens ...
-
The native 85mm 1.8 S is a no brainer. If you want to save $400, then consider the new Viltrox 85mm 1.8. I ordered the Viltrox because I don't use an 85mm very often and the reviews for the Sony ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
969 |
Threads started |
24 |
Last post |
3 hours ago |
Photos uploaded |
2 |
Last upload |
Nov 8, 2019 |
|