woodyggg

From a concert at the local fairground this week...

you make a good and valid point - for me, I could then take that same advice and apply it to everywhere I go that I want to shoot. for me, the joy is also in the capture.

I come over... but that's because I left Canon for Sony mirrorless years ago and am curious as to where things are at with Canon. Glad to see I made the right decision (for me). My original...

that's why he's here asking. no need to be mean about it. that's how people learn... we're not born with such knowledge.

I've had both.... they're both very nice.

In other words, you can't come up with a good reason either...  :)

Does it actually change the width of the picture, or only the height (or both)? I ask that because if it's the same, couldn't you just crop to 16:9 in post? Thanks!

Was curious if people ever use the 16:9 setting and why.  Thanks!

ha! I sometimes open the battery compartment to get the memory card as well!

Sony all day long.

winner!

answering questions that weren't asked.

confirmation bias.

never said it wasn't a benefit... but i'm sure as heck not going to worry about the jpeg skin color from my a7rii. I'm not shooting with this type of equipment to worry about how the camera ...

damn... maybe someone should invent something to protects said glass?!?!?!

don't know. my glass is e-mount so it doesn't impact me either way.

regarding compression... you'll find people that don't agree with that statement (there was a recent discussion). I for one would never shoot compressed - why in the world would I spend this kind ...

so you're going to spend that kind of cash on that  kind of equipment and not use raw????   ugh...

?? This is an e mount forum... that's an a mount, right?

dynamic range. *drops mic*