Beckler8

Lives in Canada NB, Canada
Joined on Sep 9, 2010

Comments

Total: 176, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

If the allegations are true, what are the chances the fact they're all religious nutcases had nothing to do with it? If you believe sci-fi type absurdities are real, then rationalizing some good 'ol fashioned discrimination is the least of your cognitive difficulties. This isn't to single out their religion rather all of them.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2017 at 22:35 UTC as 72nd comment

I think the main thing to keep in mind is that in all art, there are no "greats" or "talent". Only whether the consumer of the art likes it. That's all there is - and conveniently, all that matters. In the practical world course, some art is liked by more people than others, so can generate more cash flow.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2017 at 19:19 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply

In addition to "Beach" and "Snow" the new sony a6900 should have "Jupiter".

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2017 at 18:43 UTC as 18th comment
On article Nikon announces prices for 100th Anniversary products (114 comments in total)

What would've been really interesting is if that mini Nikon F was a working digital camera. It would be easy - just use the existing internals from one of their compacts and put it in that body, in effect.

For the DSLRs I really like the 2-tone look! Also it may be a fitting tribute - the final pro DSLRs they produce before the big switch to mirrorless. (Yep, I went there. :D)

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2017 at 19:11 UTC as 52nd comment | 1 reply
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2732 comments in total)

I think for many (most?) DPR readers a $5k camera is unfortunately little more than a curiosity; so an upcoming a6 or a7 series model is the most awaited.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2017 at 19:51 UTC as 223rd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Beckler8: There's huge irony here. DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY is the one area where you would want 8K. You can finally view your images in their entirety at full resolution from your camera (unless yours has >33 Megapixels of course). 8 MP from 4K is pretty low. Yes, depending on your combination of eyesight, viewing distance and display size you wouldn't see the difference, but that's just one scenario and fairly irrelevant. So yes, you need an 8K display.

You need it for the reason I explained. If instead you're being funny by trying to be technically correct, sure. Except nobody needs anything ever covered on this site; the word is used loosely.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2017 at 13:43 UTC

There's huge irony here. DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY is the one area where you would want 8K. You can finally view your images in their entirety at full resolution from your camera (unless yours has >33 Megapixels of course). 8 MP from 4K is pretty low. Yes, depending on your combination of eyesight, viewing distance and display size you wouldn't see the difference, but that's just one scenario and fairly irrelevant. So yes, you need an 8K display.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2017 at 03:02 UTC as 28th comment | 3 replies
On article Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM sample gallery (96 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bambi24: "$2200"...are there diamonds inside the lens?

Ahaha there may well be. Sony is stupid enuf to do that. They purposely build cameras to have bad usability (for example a6000 line) so who knows what else they're doing. :D

Link | Posted on May 17, 2017 at 19:39 UTC
On article Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM sample gallery (96 comments in total)

Apart from the lens performance, some good photography here...

Link | Posted on May 17, 2017 at 19:22 UTC as 15th comment
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2732 comments in total)
In reply to:

wb2trf: Typical photographer irrationality in this report. Does it ever occur to dpr that reports of well known prejudices do not add to any reader's knowledge. It is well known that photographers are reluctant to change brands and put a lot of stock in it. There is no information conveyed when such unscientific biases are put on display, unless one is interested in why markets change slowly, but that's not the point here. Take this one, "Also, Sony's made claims that the a9 is weather resistant, but after handling the camera and flipping out the port doors, battery door and memory card doors, I just don't have the same faith that it would survive a downpour that a D5, 1D X II or E-M1 II could shrug off. ... it's something to keep in mind." This means, "without reference to any testing of any of these brands, keep my untested anxiety in mind". We should keep your untested faith in our minds for what reason exactly? And, does MMR vaccine cause autism?

@osv Was a metaphor of course.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 19:34 UTC
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2732 comments in total)
In reply to:

wb2trf: Typical photographer irrationality in this report. Does it ever occur to dpr that reports of well known prejudices do not add to any reader's knowledge. It is well known that photographers are reluctant to change brands and put a lot of stock in it. There is no information conveyed when such unscientific biases are put on display, unless one is interested in why markets change slowly, but that's not the point here. Take this one, "Also, Sony's made claims that the a9 is weather resistant, but after handling the camera and flipping out the port doors, battery door and memory card doors, I just don't have the same faith that it would survive a downpour that a D5, 1D X II or E-M1 II could shrug off. ... it's something to keep in mind." This means, "without reference to any testing of any of these brands, keep my untested anxiety in mind". We should keep your untested faith in our minds for what reason exactly? And, does MMR vaccine cause autism?

Correct of course, but there isn't much alternative. It's not like it takes any certification or credentials (or anything else for that matter) to be a camera tester. Just start a blog and start writing, and start making stuff up; people will take you seriously I guess. Look at these so-called camera expert youtube stars with early access to new cameras. Who are they exactly, again? Yeah nobodies but the companies just want word to spread I guess.

OTOH reading opinions is still useful. There's never going to be some mutlibillion dollar international research lab dedicated to scientifically testing and publishing papers on the latest sony alpha cameras. :D DPReview is all there's ever gonna be...

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 13:46 UTC
In reply to:

MrBrightSide: I'm betting street price will be in the $4,000 range.

GCharma, yes that one. Also Sony has the 18-200 for US$1200. Why the hell aren't there way more to choose from. Who do these companies think is using all their mainstream models for video? It's just people taking home videos as they would with camcorders a few years ago. In which case you need power zoom, and there should be a zoom control on the camera body. 10 years from now this will happen as some amazing innovation.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 15:22 UTC
In reply to:

MrBrightSide: I'm betting street price will be in the $4,000 range.

It's probly safe to say it won't be anywhere near "aspiring" filmmaker price. It makes no sense that there are basically no hobbyist-price power zoom lenses for video, slr OR mirrorless, by anyone. Just one or two released like 5 years ago, that's it.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 14:51 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1908 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reactive: The spec sheet makes this look like the best performing and feature rich camera ever made. But being a Sony product, I know from bitter experience that it must include a significant flaw, or at least some badly chosen design compromises, that will irritate every single day. So apart from the pro-spec price, where's the Achilles heel on this one?

I actually know what Reactive is talking about. EVERY single Sony product I have has one or more really stupid design problems, or even hardware problems like features on a TV that literally don't work. Yet I keep buying the stuff. :D It's also true that I don't have any of their top products yet like a7 or RX. I'm assuming those are different. Sony has always made cheap garbage things as well as market-leading stuff at the top. One might call that interesting, I suppose.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 13:27 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1908 comments in total)
In reply to:

spaghettii: Well well look what we got here! A typical overpriced Sony revolutionary announcement that never delivered to its hype. I still remember those first mirroless announcements from them and they released millions of body ever since....

Let us know when you figure out what the hell you're going on about.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 13:20 UTC

I very much like where they're going with the body design compared to a7. It's looking decidedly more DSLR-like, which of course is a good thing. (However it's not innovative and obviously should've been done from the the start. DSLRs have had the same design for 30 yrs. for good reason - which is that human hands have had the same design for the last 30 million yrs - I know, humans haven't been around that long but this isn't a biology site so I can make stuff up.)

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 18:17 UTC as 149th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

pjl321: It's still a phone sized sensor so the image quality will only be that of a phone (or lower as a phone uses a prime lens). Yes, you do get 30x zoom which has benefits but it's at the cost of low light and wide angled bokeh. A decent phone today offers F1.7, this camera at it's widest is F3.3 and going all the way to F6.4 at the telephoto end. Anyone who cares about IQ would only be able to use this under the brightest of conditions as the ISO won't be great from such a small sensor.

I'm not trying to knock this camera, i'm sure Panasonic has made a class-leading product here but i am just not sure we need this class anymore. For a camera to sell it needs to set itself apart from a phone. A 1 inch sensor is a minimum now, even if that is at the cost of zoom range. A customer has to *choose* to buy this camera and then *choose* to carry it with them over their phone which they will always buy and always have with them. You have to give customers a real reason to spend their money.

So 4K video is mainstream on smartphones? Don't think so. There are several other advantages too, not the least of which is the non-smartphone form factor. Focusing on sensor size alone is nonsensical.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 15:00 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 Review (1180 comments in total)

I would have liked to see more tests of rolling shutter distortion. It's so ridiculous on the a6500, it's one thing that could drive someone from that to GH5.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2017 at 16:40 UTC as 31st comment

I'm glad they got that Finnish word error fixed - Finnish linguists were outraged.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2017 at 23:58 UTC as 16th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Beckler8: Enough of the high-resolution richly full-bearded men - apparently that's the only subject which can be photographed with the GH5. Some people prefer not to hurl their breakfast onto their computer monitor. :D

Sure, so I don't exactly enjoy examining men's facial hair (or any other feature) at high magnification (e.g. the Loupe tool) but *I'm* the one with the problem...ok then. :D I'm going to say 90% of men will agree with me (i.e. 80% of your readers.) There's a reason 100% of internet traffic (I may be exaggerating) is adult content aimed at men - we like looking at women. Not men. Ever. I've never looked at a bearded one directly.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 19:53 UTC
Total: 176, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »